Abu Hamza extradition

Yes, but we shouldn't have to meekly wait for the ECHR to give us permission to extradite this lot and others like them. We should've withdrawn from the ECHR and sent these toerags packing years ago.

And, like Bernadette, I'll believe it when I see it. Already, the human rights mob are whining about some of these cases. :rolleyes:
 
Wynonie Harris said:
Yes, but we shouldn't have to meekly wait for the ECHR to give us permission to extradite this lot and others like them. We should've withdrawn from the ECHR and sent these toerags packing years ago.

And, like Bernadette, I'll believe it when I see it. Already, the human rights mob are whining about some of these cases. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Well said Wynn
Lets hope they don't hook around, sorry I mean hang
 
Don't think this thread will run too long as I believe that there will be little disagreement over the ruling.
Incidentally I was watching an old newsreel this morning of him preaching outside the mosque and it appears that the "audience" were sitting all over the road with the police just standing there watching. Surely they should have been moving them on due to blocking a public highway, or was the footage out of context? Just a thought.
Anyway, perhaps we should all be at the airport, not to wave him goodbye but to make sure he's on the bloody plane.
 
Just looked it up he's on remand in Belmarsh Prison has been there since 06, should have been released last year but he was detained awaiting extradition
 
Don't think this thread will run too long as I believe that there will be little disagreement over the ruling.

:hidewall:
Ok the guy Hamsa is lowlife scrum, albeit with scatty religious ideology to fall back on to justify his insane rankings. However two of the other dudes, despicable though their actions were in setting up their evil websites should be prosecuted here. A decision to send them for detention and possible ultimate prosecution in America paves the way for similar deportations perhaps. Already we send people who have broken no laws in the UK to languish on remand in prison in the USA who have never even visited the states. What if I were to post something derogatory or contrary to the best interests of the US government using an AOL server? Could I be held to account by the Attorney general for such ideas? I know that it's an extreme instance, but I object to our country being used as a vassal state to the US. It's something to do with sovereignty and self determination I think.:(
 
Six years to late in my opinion, the ranting hate filled scumbag and his like dont belong here period. If they dont like it bog off or dont come here in the first place. At least lizzy said what our lilly livered politicos didnt have the balls to. To much banging on about his human rights he gave those up when he began supporting and promoting terrorism .Good riddance to bad rubbish , and with a bit of luck he will be put somewhere that make his hook go rusty.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
egg&chips said:
Don't think this thread will run too long as I believe that there will be little disagreement over the ruling.

:hidewall:
Ok the guy Hamsa is lowlife scrum, albeit with scatty religious ideology to fall back on to justify his insane rankings. However two of the other dudes, despicable though their actions were in setting up their evil websites should be prosecuted here. A decision to send them for detention and possible ultimate prosecution in America paves the way for similar deportations perhaps. Already we send people who have broken no laws in the UK to languish on remand in prison in the USA who have never even visited the states. What if I were to post something derogatory or contrary to the best interests of the US government using an AOL server? Could I be held to account by the Attorney general for such ideas? I know that it's an extreme instance, but I object to our country being used as a vassal state to the US. It's something to do with sovereignty and self determination I think.:(
Click to expand...

Saves us paying to keep the scum fed and watered :alright: A result i think.
 
egg&chips said:
Don't think this thread will run too long as I believe that there will be little disagreement over the ruling.

:hidewall:
Ok the guy Hamsa is lowlife scrum, albeit with scatty religious ideology to fall back on to justify his insane rankings. However two of the other dudes, despicable though their actions were in setting up their evil websites should be prosecuted here. A decision to send them for detention and possible ultimate prosecution in America paves the way for similar deportations perhaps. Already we send people who have broken no laws in the UK to languish on remand in prison in the USA who have never even visited the states. What if I were to post something derogatory or contrary to the best interests of the US government using an AOL server? Could I be held to account by the Attorney general for such ideas? I know that it's an extreme instance, but I object to our country being used as a vassal state to the US. It's something to do with sovereignty and self determination I think.:(
Click to expand...

I think it has more to do with long-standing extradition treaties ... some of which may need to be updated because of the revolution in technology.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top