Another ineligible player ?

straws1.jpg


Want any more to grab at?
 
I think what with the wooden spoon, straws and april fools day reference that we might just have realised that Milkman... what do you think??? :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Jimbo T :horn8:blower
 
Or is it a spelling mistake and it should read'Another Illegible player' you've got to admit that would make sense with the names of some of your players,cant think off top of my head what it is but that goalie you had on loan's name was a mouthfull:D :D
 
Taken from the Bury messageboard. Not stirring, I said it was a rumour.

"Re: Accrington facing points deduction?
<HR style="COLOR: #d1d1e1" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by gillibury

I have been told that there is another player involved in the Accrington saga who played in around 12 games.

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I have been told the same thing by a past chairman of Stanley! He believes there may still be charges to answer apart from the self-confessed listed above.
And yes he mentions 12 games! Watch the charges come back if Wrexham are relegated!
Also if Wrexham do eventually go down they will go straight to LOW if they do not get promoted back to the FL after one year."
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
 
I'm not saying that you aren't right, or that there may very well be a number of issues still to resolve, but I don't think your source is particularly reliable.
 
Is anybody else getting slightly concerned about this now...or is it just me being gullible and neurotic? Whatever, I think the club should clarify the situation with all due haste!
 
it's made me slightly nervous wynonie, but surely this would've come to light same time as the other two if it was true
 
I'll put my 2 houses on it that this 'rumour' is just that-total bollocks.Harwood Red is quite right,it would've all come out in the wash last week if it carried any weight.And also.I read earlier that Coleman went into gagaland when we netted the winner-"?So would he have done so knowing that if such a charge was brewing,it would be the end of Stanleys survival hopes this campaign no matter how many game we win?
 
I'll put my 2 houses on it that this 'rumour' is just that-total bollocks.Harwood Red is quite right,it would've all come out in the wash last week if it carried any weight.And also.I read earlier that Coleman went into gagaland when we netted the winner-"?So would he have done so knowing that if such a charge was brewing,it would be the end of Stanleys survival hopes this campaign no matter how many game we win?

ga ga land?? ha ha, well he certainly was celebrating on the pitch when 3rd one went in until he realised where he was then quickly scurried off :D

I hope my thoughts on this are true and that it is just a rumour :o
 
Yeah, you're right, lads, just me being neurotic. Sod it, off to sit outside the pub in the sunshine and celebrate yesterday's superb victory! :cool:
 
I've just seen an Observer board outside a shop on Ormerod St which says 'New Stanley League Threat'. I hope it's nothing to do with the original posting on this thread :confused:
 
Back
Top