Bee's

mab

mab

Town Elder
Tackler
:( anyone been on the bee's forum?? there not a happy lot of bee's! they want action by the FA over the postponment of sat's game even sent a letter to the FA :eek:
 
According to the club, the FA appointed the referee who turned up to make the 10am pitch inspection, so I don't reckon they've got a leg to stand on!
 
To be more accurate, Brentford has made representations to the Football League about the way it was handled. BFC fully agrees that it was right to postpone. What is at issue is the way ASFC repeatedly told BFC and its supporters during the week that the game was not at risk, the apparent pitch inspection at 10am and generally the way that ASFC was happy to play fast and loose with Brentford fans Saturdays and petrol bills.

It would seem that ASFC couldn't bring themselves to face the reality that the opportunity of getting 900+ away supporters into the stadium had been torpedoed by the weather days ago.
 
Unhappy Bee said:
To be more accurate, Brentford has made representations to the Football League about the way it was handled. BFC fully agrees that it was right to postpone. What is at issue is the way ASFC repeatedly told BFC and its supporters during the week that the game was not at risk, the apparent pitch inspection at 10am and generally the way that ASFC was happy to play fast and loose with Brentford fans Saturdays and petrol bills.

It would seem that ASFC couldn't bring themselves to face the reality that the opportunity of getting 900+ away supporters into the stadium had been torpedoed by the weather days ago.
Click to expand...

Bees stung?
 
:rolleyes: FUNNY THING IS WHAT I'VE BEEN TOLD ON THE DAY IS THAT THE MATCH DAY REF HAD AND SAY AGAIN HAD GIVEN THE GAME THE GO A HEAD AFTER HIS PITCH INSPECTION AND IT WAS YOU MANAGER WHO SAID HE DID'NT WANT THE GAME TO BE PLAYED BECAUSE HIS SIDE PLAYED ON THE FLOOR AND THAT THE PITCH WAS UNSUITABLE.SO I THINK QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ASKED AT YOUR END FIRST:)
 
OK, I'm sorry I'm making light of it. I've been on the receiving end of postponed games more than once and it's not much fun. But as far as I can make out, Stanley did everything right and should not be blamed. These things happen in football (and other sports) and always will. Just accept it and look forward to the next game, wherever it is.
 
mab said:
:rolleyes: FUNNY THING IS WHAT I'VE BEEN TOLD ON THE DAY IS THAT THE MATCH DAY REF HAD AND SAY AGAIN HAD GIVEN THE GAME THE GO A HEAD AFTER HIS PITCH INSPECTION AND IT WAS YOU MANAGER WHO SAID HE DID'NT WANT THE GAME TO BE PLAYED BECAUSE HIS SIDE PLAYED ON THE FLOOR AND THAT THE PITCH WAS UNSUITABLE.SO I THINK QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ASKED AT YOUR END FIRST:)
Click to expand...
Stick to the day job that's a poor attempt at humour.:rolleyes:

Only joking keep trying.
 
Last edited:
mab said:
:rolleyes: FUNNY THING IS WHAT I'VE BEEN TOLD ON THE DAY IS THAT THE MATCH DAY REF HAD AND SAY AGAIN HAD GIVEN THE GAME THE GO A HEAD AFTER HIS PITCH INSPECTION AND IT WAS YOU MANAGER WHO SAID HE DID'NT WANT THE GAME TO BE PLAYED BECAUSE HIS SIDE PLAYED ON THE FLOOR AND THAT THE PITCH WAS UNSUITABLE.SO I THINK QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ASKED AT YOUR END FIRST:)
Click to expand...

The match referee decides if the pitch is fit or unfit. He can't postpone it becuase one manager doesn't want to play. If that's the case then they would be charged with not fulfilling a fixture.I think that rumour is well off the mark I'm afraid.
 
melonhigh said:
OK, I'm sorry I'm making light of it. I've been on the receiving end of postponed games more than once and it's not much fun. But as far as I can make out, Stanley did everything right and should not be blamed. These things happen in football (and other sports) and always will. Just accept it and look forward to the next game, wherever it is.
Click to expand...

These things happen when the weather suddenly changes for the worse and conditions deteriorate unexpectedly. The truth is that ASFC should have realised on Friday that the game couldn't proceed and saved Brentford fans the time and considerable expense of travelling. Instead they were adamant that there was no risk of the game being postponed. And again on Saturday morning they could have called the game off early. Stanley did not play this by the book and that is why people are annoyed.
 
mab said:
:rolleyes: FUNNY THING IS WHAT I'VE BEEN TOLD ON THE DAY IS THAT THE MATCH DAY REF HAD AND SAY AGAIN HAD GIVEN THE GAME THE GO A HEAD AFTER HIS PITCH INSPECTION AND IT WAS YOU MANAGER WHO SAID HE DID'NT WANT THE GAME TO BE PLAYED BECAUSE HIS SIDE PLAYED ON THE FLOOR AND THAT THE PITCH WAS UNSUITABLE.SO I THINK QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ASKED AT YOUR END FIRST:)
Click to expand...
What you've been told is rubbish. The match referee called the game off before our manager arrived at the ground.
 
Unhappy Bee said:
These things happen when the weather suddenly changes for the worse and conditions deteriorate unexpectedly. The truth is that ASFC should have realised on Friday that the game couldn't proceed and saved Brentford fans the time and considerable expense of travelling. Instead they were adamant that there was no risk of the game being postponed. And again on Saturday morning they could have called the game off early. Stanley did not play this by the book and that is why people are annoyed.[/quo THE GAME SHOULD HAVE STARTED WITH THE AMOUNT OF AWAY FANS THAT HAD TRAVELED UP AT LEAST START THE GAME APLAY THE FIRST HALF SEE HOW THE PITCH STUD UP,WE WHERE ALSO DISSAPOINTED THAT THE GAME DIDNT GO AHEAD
Click to expand...
 
You can't base the decision of a pitch being fit to play on by the number of away fans who turn up.
 
From what I have been able to gather, the pitch was so bad that one of the touchlines was invisible due to the mud. How can a game be started when that is the case?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top