That sums it up in a nutshell.It needs to change and we need someone who is a striker playing as a striker.
If the players we have don't suit Coley's system then we either get new players or change the system
That sums it up in a nutshell.It needs to change and we need someone who is a striker playing as a striker.
If the players we have don't suit Coley's system then we either get new players or change the system
Easier said than done !!That sums it up in a nutshell.

Mind our master tactician will probably drop him, Barry had a good game at Wimbledon.![]()
We all know we have no money,we also all know the strikers we have are not the greatest, But they "Aint" getting started, others who are NOT get that privilege.Easier said than done !!
We have no money,so are reliant on loanees for key positions and hes played three different systems in the last three games !!!
the basis for me now is clean sheets (sorry Redraine) and build on that,even if it makes us a little boring.
I am sure we would have got a point if Buxton hadn't blown up (great effort btw to last that long).
A crap 1-0 will do me on saturday![]()

Possibly so? But has he been injured fer long?Cashy possibly as he has only just about reached something like full fitness Saturday - Tuesday might have just been to much for Barry.
Easier said than done !!
We have no money,so are reliant on loanees for key positions and hes played three different systems in the last three games !!!
the basis for me now is clean sheets (sorry Redraine) and build on that,even if it makes us a little boring.
I am sure we would have got a point if Buxton hadn't blown up (great effort btw to last that long).
A crap 1-0 will do me on saturday![]()
If Alfred has refused to play due to some imaginary injury to help him get a move, then that is disgusting.
Stanley pay his wages, Stanley gave him his chance and it's Stanley who have suffered during his early career while he learnt his trade.
Making up a fake injury to get help get a move when your still employed by Accrington is the lowest of the low.
When the team need him most he thinks of himself.
He is our best defender, it feels as if he has deserted us.
so only frankmoody and chubbyman thought colemans interview was awful.
how interesting.
only chubbyman and frankmoody thought we where awful yesterday.
how interesting.
Why did Flitcroft sub Jones and Hope?
I though Jones kept on catching our left back out in the first half and Hope looks just the kind of striker who would fit our system perfectly.
Cameron could have had a hatrick tonight.
Just missed out on sliding in on a free kick
Stinging Header over the bar from a corner
scored in the 2nd half
He is one of the best league 2 CB I have seen, He has pace and is good in the air. Suprised he is playing at this level.
Sorry, what?
I've not taken sides in the petty arguments that have gone on here in recent weeks but I really do have to say that this is one of most stupid posts I've seen.
Accrington Stanley SUFFERED because of Tom Aldred? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Just read that back and realise how ludicrous that sounds. He was by far the best player last season and arguably should have moved up a level in the summer. Given his form over the last 18 months, I'd say the club have been lucky to have Tom here for as long as they have.
The amount of times that he's picked up injuries during games and shaken it off to continue playing or to make it in time for the next game is a testament to the type of player he is and you're happy to slag him off because you've bought into Coley's post-match comments about him.
Personally, I think there's got to be more to it than meets the eye. Everyone on here would acknowledge that it takes more than a minor knock to stop Aldred from pulling on the Red shirt and playing for ASFC.
If he is to leave then I wish him the best of luck. The club gave him a chance after leaving Colchester and he most certainly took it with both hands - or feet, in this instance and the club have reaped the rewards with some outstanding performances from him. He deserves to play at a higher level and at least him leaving now will bring some money into the club.
The only thing I agree with you on is that he's Stanley's best defender. That much, for me, is unquestionable.
Its only one of the most stupid posts yeh have seen, due to the fact yeh aint been on here that long, Davos been consistent fer a few years now.Sorry, what?
I've not taken sides in the petty arguments that have gone on here in recent weeks but I really do have to say that this is one of most stupid posts I've seen.
Accrington Stanley SUFFERED because of Tom Aldred? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Just read that back and realise how ludicrous that sounds. He was by far the best player last season and arguably should have moved up a level in the summer. Given his form over the last 18 months, I'd say the club have been lucky to have Tom here for as long as they have.
The amount of times that he's picked up injuries during games and shaken it off to continue playing or to make it in time for the next game is a testament to the type of player he is and you're happy to slag him off because you've bought into Coley's post-match comments about him.
Personally, I think there's got to be more to it than meets the eye. Everyone on here would acknowledge that it takes more than a minor knock to stop Aldred from pulling on the Red shirt and playing for ASFC.
.

Never mind the last three games, I thought from last night's analysis that you'd assessed that he had played at least three different systems against Bury !!....I reckoned it was 6-3-1 which you dismissed and trumped with 4-3-3 then 4-4-2 then ?...and. ?.
It's really great having mates-in- the-know !!.

At one point in the second half,it seemed both teams went man for man !!!,and ended up 4-2-4 !
Think the widemen from both teams were knackered and couldn't track back which made for a end to end game for a time !!!
Don't think that was in the script![]()
Thats what i was told last night as well but with the Tranmere game thrown in as wellThe word "on the street" last night was that Coley had allegedly criticised Tom after Wimbledon for his recent performances and assured him he would be dropped for last night's game. That might explain things, but I have no idea how true it is.

Thats what i was told last night as well but with the Tranmere game thrown in as well![]()
The word "on the street" last night was that Coley had allegedly criticised Tom after Wimbledon for his recent performances and assured him he would be dropped for last night's game. That might explain things, but I have no idea how true it is.

Maybe it would help if the players around him were played in their proper positions.
Winnard being squeezed into the side in any full-back role because he's one of Coley's favourites is damaging the side and meant that Buxton had to play out of position himself at left-back, though he had a solid game in fairness to him.
Conneely looked much better as a central defender than he did as a left back comparing his performance last night with the one against Tranmere.
Nevertheless, there were two people sat on the bench who could have started in the full-back roles and made things a lot easier for the defence - Nicky Hunt and Michael Liddle.
But what do we know, we're not the ones with the coaching badges after all...![]()
We are getting better and closer to a clean sheet
Tranmere conceded 3
Wimbledon conceded 2
Bury conceded 1
Maybe Saturday will be our day

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.