Bury
- Thread starter Haggis316
- Start date
Are you seriously suggesting it was right he was sent to the stands ?
The linesman and referee were the worst I have ever EVER seen. Their first goal was offside by a country mile. They're keeper came flying out of his area, elbowed the striker and absolutely nothing happened - apart from the referee turning around and sending coley to the stands for being rightfully enraged by the decision. Keeper should been have sent off for the elbow or for the foul on the last man, the ball was nowhere near he simply took out the striker AND NOTHING HAPPENED. Then, when Sodje was the last man, took down player in the area he only got a yellow ? What rule book does this ref follow ?
Bury were not that dirty a side to be honest but they had to fouls on the last man and that is 2 red cards plain and simple.
Stanley gave a bloody good account of themselves against 13 men today.
i too thought stanley gave a good account of themselves today, nevertheless if ya don't take yer chances ya pay the price. the first penalty was a definate red that never came, the second could not see fer the bloody fog, seems strange to me 2 games were abandonded today through fog, yet these clowns allowed this match to continue, when good long vision was badly impaired.
who said all the "CLOWNS" are in the circus.
who said all the "CLOWNS" are in the circus.
Steve Coppell was complaining yesterday that Premiership referees should stay in their own league because they hadn't a clue what to do when they are faced with 'proper' football. Have to say the worst refs on the Turf this season have been the premiership ones.
on that basis probably the best thing would be non-league refs fer premierships n other leagues, gotta be n improvement on some of the crap ive seen.
today being a definate.
When the fog was at its worst today and you couldn't see much on the Clayton End, two of my mates went and stood on the side. When it cleared a bit they came back and said that that the view was fine from pitch level. I don't think that game was ever in danger of being called off.
I'm just surprised that nobody has mentioned the new seating arrangements yet.
I'm just surprised that nobody has mentioned the new seating arrangements yet.
didnt buy a programme so dont know about it, what are the arrangements going to be! we should of scored first when he hit it high and wide over but that wasnt his fault hean hasnt really played most game this season! we should of score that penalty! trust bury to go 4 games without socreing beofre comeing to us! jimmy deserved to get mom thought he played very well! wounder why liam got taken off at half-time! coley should not of got sent to the stands, but then again he shouldnt of ran down the line and whacked the ball no doubt he will get a touch line ban for that! well played to lads today we shold of got at least of point out of it we need gornell back we did miss him upfront today clarke should of started imo
Well, I for one, am not happy about the plans for the new seats. 300 along the Whinney Hill side in the existing stand and 600 in the lower section of the Clayton End. So now we'll all be squashed like sardines in the upper section with rows of empty seats below us. I reckon it'll spoil the atmosphere on the Clayton End. Why couldn't they put them in the Coppice End and have an open, seated away section like Stockport?
600 in the lower section of the clayton end! thats rubbsih will spoil the atmosphere of the clayton end as it will look stupid people sitting than us standing behind them! why couldnt they all be put on the coppice end or the cow shed end! how will it work with the gate fee on the clayton end will you have to pay more if you want to sit down but what if you pay to stand up than sit down for the game!
Why couldn't they put them in the Coppice End and have an open, seated away section like Stockport?
Presumably because it would have reduced the capacity in that end ?
Probably, but they're just going to be reducing the capacity in the Clayton End instead. Also, according to the programme, "the addition of seating and crowd crush barriers in the Whinney Hill terrace will actually increase the area's capacity." So it seems to me, it's as broad as it's as long.
I have to say as a Bury fan i am not sure you can say that the ref was biased as you got two pens today! the first on was a definite pen and futcher was last man not sodje! therefore correct decision yellow card as for the second i don't know still now why it was given and i was behind the goal watching the whole thing. Bury should have had a goal before we actually scored but the linesman! sorry assistant flagged wrongly for offside! the first goal couldn't have been offside as bishop played the ball back from the line therefore you can't be offside.
Stanley came in to it in the second half but we went defensive to kill the game and we did what we had too
You cant really complain if a ref gives you two pens and you still dont get anything out of the game.
i like stanley and i live in accy i have watched stanley on many occasions an i wish you well for the rest of the season but how many times has coleman been sent to the stands and is he going for a record?
Stanley came in to it in the second half but we went defensive to kill the game and we did what we had too
You cant really complain if a ref gives you two pens and you still dont get anything out of the game.
i like stanley and i live in accy i have watched stanley on many occasions an i wish you well for the rest of the season but how many times has coleman been sent to the stands and is he going for a record?
Why couldn't they put them in the Coppice End and have an open, seated away section like Stockport?
Think we have to have a minimum of 2,000 covered seats, Sockport already have that for the home fans.
Seem to remember Eric getting upset with this messageboard for starting the rumour that seats will be going under the new roof a while back. Was that because this was the plan all along?
If anybody has time to explain plans I'd be much obliged, couldn't afford £13 and a programme. (I'm wondering is it all Whinney Hill, or just the away end?)
Finally, maybe the away kit would have been better yesterday, looked like our lads couldn't see each other when they passed.
Think we have to have a minimum of 2,000 covered seats, Sockport already have that for the home fans.
Seem to remember Eric getting upset with this messageboard for starting the rumour that seats will be going under the new roof a while back. Was that because this was the plan all along?
In that case, I suppose we'll just have to like it or lump it. As you say, though, it is a bit rich after the club were so indignant when supporters dared to suggest that there was a plan afoot to install seats on the Clayton End. I also thought that the club might have sought the views of fans a bit more instead of just presenting the whole thing as a fait accompli.
I also thought that the club might have sought the views of fans a bit more instead of just presenting the whole thing as a fait accompli.
You did?? Really?? Consult the fans before making a decision??
You did?? Really?? Consult the fans before making a decision??
Yes, I did. Never learn, do I? Anyway, I'm really cheesed off about it. I waited over 40 years for something like the Clayton End at Stanley and I love it. Once these seats are installed, I reckon it just won't "feel" right anymore. Does anybody else feel the same...or am I making a mountain out of a molehill?