And this from a "Nu Labour" supporter...priceless!![]()
There you go again Wynonie, trying to label me. I support the local Labour party - as I have said many times, this does not necessarily mean that I support the national party on all issues!
And this from a "Nu Labour" supporter...priceless!![]()

cameron will never be prime minister, hes a prat!!
hes creepy too![]()
agree with AB wasn't a bad speech, what it omitted was how the hell he was going to pay for it. lol according to economists anyway. as for brown pinching the policies cyfr if he did he watered em down a bit and SAID how he was going to pay for em.It wasn't, as speeches go, a bad speech, but it wasn't a good one either. And I think that just about sums up the state of the party at the moment; middling. It has too much of the Curate's egg about it.
I can remember listening to the blessed Margaret, in her prime, when she had the Conference hanging on her every word and gesture. She delivered big, bold, no-nonsense ideas and objectives and the party and the country backed her to the hilt; even though one half suspects that it was because they were too intimidated by her to do anything else.
Cameron, it strikes me, would like to be seen as the Tory equivalent of Blair, but without the maniacal ego; it won't work, he will just end up becoming a sort of vaguely right - ish Charles Kennedey.

but if he is ever elected those "old Tories" will get rid of him within 2 years.
OK..but clause 4 was chucked out mainly by the unions by a vote... and it was before Labour/Blair won the election... there is no way the grass roots nor the Maggie loving MP's in the Tory party will put up with a "soft socialist" like Cameron for to long, they ache for the good old 80's up down economy... Cameron has to deliver tax cuts, and the sort of tax cuts were the big earners save the most money.Possibly, but Old Labour never got rid of Bliar, even after he'd chucked out clause 4 from the party constitution. Power is a great aphrodisiac!
there is no way the grass roots nor the Maggie loving MP's in the Tory party will put up with a "soft socialist" like Cameron for to long, they ache for the good old 80's up down economy...
agree with AB wasn't a bad speech, what it omitted was how the hell he was going to pay for it. lol according to economists anyway. as for brown pinching the policies cyfr if he did he watered em down a bit and SAID how he was going to pay for em.![]()
Cameron can make as many promises as he likes, and as Garinda says, the old Tories must be choking on their brandy... but if he is ever elected those "old Tories" will get rid of him within 2 years.
i was listening to economists not brown.Cameron laid down EXACTLY how he was going to pay for it. Don't listen to Brown propaganda!
as i previously said,but typical tory= reads the bits they want. pmsldidn't read it,was listening to one of the news channels. you will never make a politition cyfr, i said listening not reading. pmslWhere did you read it?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.