Conservative candidate named.

[garinda]

I wouldn't bank on it since you've been so incredibly rude to her. Yes she might be a politician, but that's no excuse. Do find something better to do.

Incredibly rude?

Could you helpfully quote where I've been 'incredibley rude' please? Then I can either disagree, and argue that I was just offering my personal opinion, or aplogise most humbly?

If you don't back up your criticism with actual examples, it's really impossible for me to comment further.

Especially since this forum is now very well moderated, and anything deemed 'offensive' to other members is quite rightly deleted, and as far as I'm aware the only post I've had deleted in this thread was when I quoted some pseudo-Latin from Ms. Buckley's website, which was quite rightly deleted, because I'd posted in a language other than English.

I look forward to you providing examples of what you accuse me of, so I can either defend myself, or apologise.

I wait with bated breath.

 

[garinda]

I'm sure she will. Personally I just think Garinda is being unnecessarily rude.

If I am, you have a few options open to you.

If what's posted is 'offensive or malicious', you can report it.

You can put me on 'ignore', then you won't get all upset at what I post, because you'll be unable to see it.

You could always have another little sulk, and stay away for a while, until you feel more able to cope with things that don't suit you.

 

[garinda]

It's a hard lesson for some people to accept.

Realising that not everything in life, goes exactly how you'd like it to.

YouTube - Crying like a Baby.

 

[andrewb]

Incredibly rude?

Could you helpfully quote where I've been 'incredibley rude' please? Then I can either disagree, and argue that I was just offering my personal opinion, or aplogise most humbly?

If you don't back up your criticism with actual examples, it's really impossible for me to comment further.

Especially since this forum is now very well moderated, and anything deemed 'offensive' to other members is quite rightly deleted, and as far as I'm aware the only post I've had deleted in this thread was when I quoted some pseudo-Latin from Ms. Buckley's website, which was quite rightly deleted, because I'd posted in a language other than English.

I look forward to you providing examples of what you accuse me of, so I can either defend myself, or apologise.

I wait with bated breath.

It's my opinion. I think you've been quite rude in this thread when it comes to her schooling and things. I'm sure she won't care one bit, and nor do I. I just think that it's rude when as far as I'm aware you haven't even spoken to her.

 

[garinda]

It's my opinion. I think you've been quite rude in this thread when it comes to her schooling and things. I'm sure she won't care one bit, and nor do I. I just think that it's rude when as far as I'm aware you haven't even spoken to her.

Is that the very best example of my 'incredible rudeness' towards Ms. Buckley, that you could come up with?

I thought you'd be struggling.



Even though I know exactly what I've posted, I've just reread the whole thread, and stand by what I've posted.

I offered comment, on the evidence of three of my friends who were educated at Queen Mary's at the same time as our candidate. It was a relatively 'posh' school, and in my opinion didn't offer the best academic education amongst girl's private schools in the northwest.

How very rude, to offer this opinion.

I'l be accused as being the first person to mention Lytham as being 'snooty' next.

(I wasn't by the way, if you care to research a little more thoroughly.)

 

[garinda]

Perhaps the real issue is that you don't like what I've posted.

She did go to a private girl's school in Lytham. This might not be clear to those in Hyndburn who don't know Queen Mary's.

She tells of her membership of a Baptist church. I offer comment that exorcisms are carried out at Baptist churches in Lytham, to 'cure' homosexuals.

She hasn't had much visible presence locally so far, in the press, or in person.

All factual.

I did post a photograph of Jeanette Krankie, but conversely, and with similar humour, yesterday I posted a photograph in a thread about Labour candidate Ken Moss, which purported to show him drunk, and living rough.

I look forward to your accusation that I was 'incredibley rude' to a prospective Labour politican. Or doesnt that fit with your rather narrow agenda?

 

[andrewb]

Perhaps the real issue is that you don't like what I've posted.

She did go to a private girl's school in Lytham. This might not be clear to those in Hyndburn who don't know Queen Mary's.

She tells of her membership of a Baptist church. I offer comment that exorcisms are carried out at Baptist churches in Lytham, to 'cure' homosexuals.

She hasn't had much visible presence locally so far, in the press, or in person.

All factual.

I did post a photograph of Jeanette Krankie, but conversely, and with similar humour, yesterday I posted a photograph in a thread about Labour candidate Ken Moss, which purported to show him drunk, and living rough.

I look forward to your accusation that I was 'incredibley rude' to a prospective Labour politican. Or doesnt that fit with your rather narrow agenda?

Agenda? I think you have a bit of paranoia.

No I don't like what you say, because I think it's rather rude. Posting comments about how she's posh and things without even knowing her. Why on earth would you post links about exorcisms to 'cure' homosexuality in this thread about a candidate?

 

[Tealeaf]

.... Why on earth would you post links about exorcisms to 'cure' homosexuality in this thread about a candidate?

A strange and devlish voice in his head told him to post the link.

 

[cashman]

I think you have a bit of a "Baby" mentality Andrew.

 

[jaysay]

I wouldn't bank on it since you've been so incredibly rude to her. Yes she might be a politician, but that's no excuse. Do find something better to do.

Spot on Andrew.

 

[jaysay]

I'm sure she will. Personally I just think Garinda is being unnecessarily rude.

You must know by now we're supposed to make exceptions for Rindi

 

[Wynonie Harris]

Spot on Andrew.

This from the fella who called Graham Jones "a numpty".

 

[garinda]

You must know by now we're supposed to make exceptions for Rindi

Again, I look forward to any quoted evidence you'd care to supply, rather than more empty rhetoric. Which seems more inspired by the fact that you don't happen to like what's been posted, because of political affiliation.

Having reread everything that I've posted in this thread, as stated earlier, I wish you luck, and look forward to seeing evidence of my 'incredible rudeness'...if that's possible for you to do.

 

[garinda]

This from the fella who called Graham Jones "a numpty".

Come, come.

'Incredible rudeness' is a one way street, and doesn't count in some people's politically blinkered eyes, if it's aimed at some one they don't agree with.

Although I'm struggling to remember when I've been accused of 'incredible rudeness', when referring to the Labour government as 'morally bankrupt', 'disgusting', and 'vile'.

Rather odd, that.

 

[garinda]

You must know by now we're supposed to make exceptions for Rindi

I'm an oridinary member of Accy Web, just like everyone else on the forum, and subject to the same rules and regulations.

Again, any examples of 'exceptions' made for myself, I'm sure we'd find most illuminating.

Unless it's another case of sour grapes, that not everything posted on here, suits your agenda.

 

[garinda]

I'm sure she won't care one bit, and nor do I.

...and yet you 'care' enought to post your opinion?

Though when challenged, seem unable to supply any factual evidence to back up your unsubstantiated claim?

If anything I've posted is factually incorrect, such as I did when you claimed that the Daily Mail supported Labour in the 1997 General election, and which I offered my personal knowledge that you were wrong, further backed up by other independent evidence, you are also free to do so in this thread. Rather than making the rather pitiful comment of my 'being incredibley rude', which you seem unable to back up with quotes of said insults.

I'll always have evidence, to back up, and counteragrue, anything I've ever said on this forum.

Otherwise I'd feel what I was posting would appear a bit pathetic.

 

[jaysay]

I'm an ordinary member of Accy Web, just like everyone else on the forum, and subject to the same rules and regulations.

Again, any examples of 'exceptions' made for myself, I'm sure we'd find most illuminating.

Unless it's another case of sour grapes, that not everything posted on here, suits your agenda.

Obviously I'm not the only one who thinks so, according to some emails I've received and not from usual suspects either ie political affiliates

 

[andrewb]

Come, come.

'Incredible rudeness' is a one way street, and doesn't count in some people's politically blinkered eyes, if it's aimed at some one they don't agree with.

Although I'm struggling to remember when I've been accused of 'incredible rudeness', when referring to the Labour government as 'morally bankrupt', 'disgusting', and 'vile'.

Rather odd, that.

Considering you haven't said anything political for me to agree or disagree with, it's a bit of an odd alleyway you seem to be leading yourself down.

As for evidence, if you have read all your posts and still don't think that you've been rude, then it is pointless me showing you specific posts, as you won't think they're rude either. I gave my opinion that you were rude, yours obviously differs.

 

[garinda]

Why on earth would you post links about exorcisms to 'cure' homosexuality in this thread about a candidate?

Because we have so little evidence of what her actual political beliefs are, other than what's on her website. A website on which she herselfs talks about being a member of a Baptist church in Lytham.

The fact that there is testimony of someone being exorcised at a Baptist church in her home town, to 'cure' them of homosexuality, might be deemed relevant information to some, when deciding on the suitability of which candidate they are going to vote for.

Neither incredible, nor rude. Just a valid, and factual observation.

 

[andrewb]

Because we have so little evidence of what her actual political beliefs are, other than what's on her website. A website on which she herselfs talks about being a member of a Baptist church in Lytham.

The fact that there is testimony of someone being exorcised at a Baptist church in her home town, to 'cure' them of homosexuality, might be deemed relevant information to some, when deciding on the suitability of which candidate they are going to vote for.

Neither incredible, nor rude. Just a valid, and factual observation.

Sure somebody might be influenced by her beliefs. The alleged exorcism though has nothing at all to do with her and need not be posted on a thread about her. Just a pathetic attempt to link things that have nothing to do with each other.