Conservative candidate named.
- Thread starter garinda
- Start date
No cashy that column is about HBC nothing to do with national politics unless they come into contact with HBC, the Column is The Leaders Column, nothing to to with the general electionseems to me "Why" was explained a couple of letters back.
That too me is a real "Cop Out" as its about P.R. n being magnanimous, summat P.B. is totally incapable of IMHO.No cashy that column is about HBC nothing to do with national politics unless they come into contact with HBC, the Column is The Leaders Column, nothing to to with the general election
No cashy that column is about HBC nothing to do with national politics unless they come into contact with HBC, the Column is The Leaders Column, nothing to to with the general election
I bet there would have been some noticeable exceptions to this, had the choice of candidate fallen to a more, 'Worthy?', head.
Stop it off, you'll have me wetting my pants
Your bladder isn't my concern, however if you think that I am in the habit of telling lies, you are wrong.
In the past he's used his column in the Observer to talk about the General Election, as well as Greg Pope.
Perhaps that's been convieniently forgotton, when coming up with this excuse, defending sour grapes.
am aware of that, not having "Tunnel Vision"In the past he's used his column in the Observer to talk about the General Election, as well as Greg Pope.
Perhaps that's been convieniently forgotton, when coming up with this excuse, defending sour grapes.
I bet there would have been some noticeable exceptions to this, had the choice of candidate fallen to a more, 'Worthy?', head.
Why, Oh, Why, didn't Peters parents Call him Richard?
Somehow calling him Peter Head would be more of an insult to the town than to him.
(Enter Stage left, andrewb to protest about my insulting behaviour, save yourself the effort andrew, it's alright, I can be nasty, I've met him.).
Hurrah!
She has got some press coverage.
Though sadly not a prize, for star letter of the week.
Notice she chose not to print her address in Hyndburn, with her letter.
Why, Oh, Why, didn't Peters parents Call him Richard?
Somehow calling him Peter Head would be more of an insult to the town than to him.
(Enter Stage left, andrewb to protest about my insulting behaviour, save yourself the effort andrew, it's alright, I can be nasty, I've met him.).
Nice ring to it.
Peterhead and Districts Borough Council.
Thats terribly Rude Garinda
Thats terribly Rude Garinda
Though some would say not quite as 'incredibly rude' as inferring I was telling lies, when I said I haven't decided how to vote in the forthcoming elections.
I know it's common place for those who are involved within party politics, to accuse those they oppose of being liars, but happily in the circles I move in that isn't the case.
I believe in telling the truth, or I wouldn't bother saying something.
I didn't actually name you in my post. I'm glad you see "arguments twisted by some members for the sake of it" as yourself though. I don't believe anybody, ill or not, should go around making the forums unenjoyable by constantly twisting words in members posts. To write what you have done above, and even suggest, that 'nothing better to do' is anything relating to illness is a rather low blow indeed and a completely unfair representation of what I said. It's quite clear that I attributed the repeated negative twisting of arguments to 'nothing better to do', rather than posting in general.
To bring up such unfounded rubbish like this, publicly as well, is quite offensive.
You replied to a post, and quoted Wynonie, which named, and discussed myself.
It's there for all to see.
No twisting of words.
You can try and squirm, and back track, but what you said is there, for everyone to read, and people can make their own mind up about what you posted.
Oh yes, my post did refer to you. There's no doubt about that. My post was replying to when Wynonie had mentioned my name at the end of his post. My point was that you were not named, but knew that you were the one who was being referred to by simply the description of "arguments twisted by some members for the sake of it".
Anyway that's the last I'll say on the matter because quite frankly the post you made is disgustingly low.
Yes I knew you were referring to myself, because it was very similar to what you said in a message to me, to which I replied that I would carry on posting as I saw fit, prior to your sulky little withdrawl.
Like I said, I wasn't insulted, it just made me laugh, at your desparation.
Yes I knew you were referring to myself, because it was very similar to what you said in a message to me, to which I replied that I would carry on posting as I saw fit, prior to your sulky little withdrawl.
Like I said, I wasn't insulted, it just made me laugh, at your desparation.
The only desperation here is you linking your illness into this when it has nothing at all to do with it. It's the most appalling accusation I've read on Accyweb.
I do hope you retract what you posted and apologise as there is no link or truth in it what so ever. I won't hold my breath.
You're right. 'cause I'm angry that somebody would write something like Garinda did, with not a shred of evidence for such huge accusation.
Last edited by a moderator: