Craney Off??

thats for the club to say on the fishy site but deals done

Isn't it also for the club to say that he has gone? If you can disclose this transfer information before it's on the fishy site then you can disclose the amount of the transfer fee.
 
procter is unable to do even the simple things on a football field and to compare him with craney is ludicrous
 
procter is unable to do even the simple things on a football field and to compare him with craney is ludicrous

Precisely. If Craney put the effort in to match his ability then he would've surpassed Procter both in goals and standard of performances, but the simple fact is that he didn't. Procter played far better than Craney last season.
 
Ok opologies to jiffy & maverick, just next time wait for link before announcing would help:D thanks haggis:D
 
yes Jeff and Macca maybe it is for the club to give that OFFICIAL confirmation ur always banging on about so let's just wait and see then. It makes no odds if u believe me or not does it deals done. Fishy site is always slow about these things
 
Me wonders if he knew he was being scouted to suddenly switch his play - & obviously avoiding the home test:rolleyes:
 
I'll say it again, I for one am glad to see him gone. We are relieved of a player who did not put the effort in week in/week out for our club.

On Stanley On.
 
Mmmm reading fishy site seems that the undisclosed fee is not going on a replacement but reinjection into the club.
 
shakes didn't Craney only sign back in October on loan and then permanently in the January window half way through last season? So Proccys 3 more goals aint really that impressive is it now? Anyways if he was that good surely clubs would be bidding for Proccy wouldn't they? I just hope the money we get (some of it anyways) is given to Coley to get 1 maybe 2 midfielders in, preferably 1 that can replace Craney's goal tally.
 
Huddersfield Examiner suggest "Robbo" joined "for a down-payment with add-on incentives to total £250,000". Stan indicates "substantial payment" of similar order to "Robbo".

Sounds like good business by Eric to me.
 
yes Jeff and Macca maybe it is for the club to give that OFFICIAL confirmation ur always banging on about so let's just wait and see then. It makes no odds if u believe me or not does it deals done. Fishy site is always slow about these things

don't bring me in to this - I knew the story had basis



the link Haggis gave us has Stan Ternent saying that they have paid similar to what they paid for Gary Roberts. That was said to be around £180k
 
shakes didn't Craney only sign back in October on loan and then permanently in the January window half way through last season? So Proccys 3 more goals aint really that impressive is it now? Anyways if he was that good surely clubs would be bidding for Proccy wouldn't they? I just hope the money we get (some of it anyways) is given to Coley to get 1 maybe 2 midfielders in, preferably 1 that can replace Craney's goal tally.

I'm not saying Procter is better than Craney, he isn't. I'm saying that a player of Procter's standard shouldn't have statistics that come close to Craney's. Yet because of Craney's total lack of commitment and love for being a lazy prima donna, his ability was left at home.
 
shakermaker said:
I'll say it again, I for one am glad to see him gone. We are relieved of a player who did not put the effort in week in/week out for our club.

Seconded.

Stanleymad said:
Mmmm reading fishy site seems that the undisclosed fee is not going on a replacement but reinjection into the club.

For Eric Whalley read Bob Lord. The money will be going towards the 'Ian Craney Stand'.
 
i didnt want ian to leave he has played well last couple of games! i hope we get a replaced ment becuase the team seem to start playing well this season with craney back in his position

good luck ian thanks for the goal agaisnt vale
 
Back
Top