maccawzzagod said:Would you rather that we didn't build it or have I misread the tone of your post?
Just being facetious. I totally approve of Mr. Whalley's fund raising methods in this instance.

maccawzzagod said:Would you rather that we didn't build it or have I misread the tone of your post?

i didnt want ian to leave he has played well last couple of games!
I wasn't going back that far Haggis316. I was referring to the Martin Dobson stand at Dingle HQ.

you might off seen him he might of gone the ground for the final goodbyes and things than gone petrol station than drove the huddlesfield for the medical
Stanleymad said:The amount of dingle bashing thats being plagued on STANLEY forum lately we may as well rename the darn thing dingle v barsteward bash.............Hello stanley forum stanley related if not take it to gen footy or better still venge your own rivalries on your own footy forum!


What a load of undiluted drivel. I was, of course, alluding to the similarities in fund raising methods to pay for extensions to the clubs premises. Get it now.![]()

Andy Procter, who has half of the ability that Craney possesses, played far better than Craney last season and got three more goals than Craney did. Blame it on Craney not being played in the correct position all you want but the fact of the matter is Ian Craney didn't but the sufficient amount of effort in and his attitude on the pitch stank to high heaven. We're better off without him. If Craney put the effort in he'd be a brilliant player - but he's a lazy prima donna.



We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.