Yeah, that's right, never heard of him up to a few weeks ago. Who the hell is he, anyway? Soddin' bandwagon jumper!
Dave O'Neil statement
- Thread starter maccawozzagod
- Start date
Yeah, that's right, never heard of him up to a few weeks ago. Who the hell is he, anyway? Soddin' bandwagon jumper!
Re: On stanley on>>>>>
and for lack of leadership, and lack of initiative, and inability to communicate, and unwarranted personal attack on another individual, and failure to compromise, and losing the support of his vice-chairman ........
and for lack of leadership, and lack of initiative, and inability to communicate, and unwarranted personal attack on another individual, and failure to compromise, and losing the support of his vice-chairman ........
Re: On stanley on>>>>>
Erm can we keep discussions on topics already threaded rather than starting new ones basically with same topic, or otherwise be unindated with new threads sayin same thing, so hence move to more appropiate place where this discussion is in existance, thank you please
Erm can we keep discussions on topics already threaded rather than starting new ones basically with same topic, or otherwise be unindated with new threads sayin same thing, so hence move to more appropiate place where this discussion is in existance, thank you please
Re: On stanley on>>>>>
He was quite happy to use the medium of the club programme to launch an attack on another individual. But he failed to use that medium to put forward a positive alternative plan.
He was quite happy to use the medium of the club programme to launch an attack on another individual. But he failed to use that medium to put forward a positive alternative plan.
Re: On stanley on>>>>>
I Bet that he doesn't do any more Radio interviews!
'Where to next ??????
But has he got a positive alternative to put forward Red ?...If he has he didn't say anything in depth about it !.......Wish he would !!.......but..
I Bet that he doesn't do any more Radio interviews!
'Where to next ??????
Re: On stanley on>>>>>
that may be very ture but he didnt cause the mess iin the 1st place but have to agreed he could of handle things alot better when the mess came to light when he 1st came to stanley,he must of known of the mess when he took over
i still believe he should give straight forward answers but a oneill witch hunt will not pay the taxman
that may be very ture but he didnt cause the mess iin the 1st place but have to agreed he could of handle things alot better when the mess came to light when he 1st came to stanley,he must of known of the mess when he took over
i still believe he should give straight forward answers but a oneill witch hunt will not pay the taxman
Like what? His time? No I think not, he is quick to judge and more than a little upset that he was not given first option to buy...sour grapes me thinks.
And he's clever enough to get people to belive his ever word, if he was as keen on saving the club as he says then why pull out? is it because people won't roll over and play dead to his demands? He wants it all and has thrown his dummy out when he was told no....
And he's clever enough to get people to belive his ever word, if he was as keen on saving the club as he says then why pull out? is it because people won't roll over and play dead to his demands? He wants it all and has thrown his dummy out when he was told no....
Re: On stanley on>>>>>
Actually, you are quite wrong there. You should read the posts that were being written a couple of months ago. David O'Neill was trusted; people believed that he was the person to lead us out of the mess. There was some concern that he failed to act on the fundraising issue even before the last court hearing. Then after that court hearing, we waited ... and waited ... and waited. But no initiatives were forthcoming - except from the hardworking fans. Only now are the judgements being made, and he has brought that upon himself by those programme notes and by his failure to say exactly how he plans to pay off the debt. Of course, we may be wrong - he may have an ace up his sleeve. But now there is a huge cynicism within the fan base - and beyond it. No-one else is to blame for that.
Actually, you are quite wrong there. You should read the posts that were being written a couple of months ago. David O'Neill was trusted; people believed that he was the person to lead us out of the mess. There was some concern that he failed to act on the fundraising issue even before the last court hearing. Then after that court hearing, we waited ... and waited ... and waited. But no initiatives were forthcoming - except from the hardworking fans. Only now are the judgements being made, and he has brought that upon himself by those programme notes and by his failure to say exactly how he plans to pay off the debt. Of course, we may be wrong - he may have an ace up his sleeve. But now there is a huge cynicism within the fan base - and beyond it. No-one else is to blame for that.
Mr. O’Neil is a very inapt communicator, which is blatantly obvious. However, there are those around him that are maybe less than helpful to his position otherwise he would have never had made the error he did with the programme. But without the financial assistance of Mr. Khan or Mr. Marsden, he’s all we’ve got….He Owns the Club, for now there’s nothing we can do but to continue to support Accrington Stanley and pray we come out of this **** smelling of roses.
Please; there are more than enough posts on the subject, please lets not make it any more difficult
Please; there are more than enough posts on the subject, please lets not make it any more difficult
I am just in hope that he has a very big ace up his sleave and can manage to shut everyone up.... he'll be the best person for the job if he pulls this one off, the bloke can't win, this is not down to him and the backlash is very wrongly being aimed at him and his team, ...They asked for support the day after the court hearing? How do we know that initiatives and ideas were not being put forward behind closed doors...
More difficult?
Than what?I for one am not happy to allow people to make claims that are untrue. And it was untrue to say that people were quick to judge the DON - they weren't.
Yes, at the moment he seems to be all we've got and we have to hope that he can get us out of the mess.
And we all support Accrington Stanley. Let's not confuse the club with any individuals.
More difficult?
I for one am not happy to allow people to make claims that are untrue. And it was untrue to say that people were quick to judge the DON - they weren't.
Yes, at the moment he seems to be all we've got and we have to hope that he can get us out of the mess.
And we all support Accrington Stanley. Let's not confuse the club with any individuals.
I don't think we are really, and when I said about making it any more difficult, I meant by the number of posts we have to keep going back and forth over to discuss the same issue.
I dont belive this is an untrue statement, I feel people have been quick to judge, a couple of months ago, noone really knew the extent of the problems, people wanted shut of Mr Whalley and were quite happy for DON to take the helm, it was only after he took over that the real financial problems came to light.