We get a winding up order issued for £308K 
yet:
Manchester United's debts swell to £716.5m - Barclays Premier League - ESPN Soccernet
yet:
Manchester United's debts swell to £716.5m - Barclays Premier League - ESPN Soccernet
Spookily I was just discussing with Mel about the article on West Ham on the BBC.
BBC Sport - Football - Hammers want £100,000-a-week star
110m in debt and they brag about offering a special player 100k a week.
It stinks and the sooner football implodes on itelf and the big clubs go to the wall the better it will be all round.
BBC Sport - Football - Hammers want £100,000-a-week star
110m in debt and they brag about offering a special player 100k a week.
It stinks and the sooner football implodes on itelf and the big clubs go to the wall the better it will be all round.
It seems Fifa are changing the rules for season 2012/13 All clubs will only be able to spend the money they generate within their own club, looks like clubs such as City(overspent by £98 million, this year, biggest lose in football history) Chelski etc will be up the creek without paddle
Gordon Brown has now criticized football clubs for running up too much debt...
BBC Sport - Football - Prime Minister Gordon Brown warns football over debts
Quite right too. Just imagine if he ran the country like that, building up huge debts. Where would we be then, I ask you?
BBC Sport - Football - Prime Minister Gordon Brown warns football over debts
Quite right too. Just imagine if he ran the country like that, building up huge debts. Where would we be then, I ask you?
Football clubs need to get a grip especially those at top end, money has seriously spoilt the great game (not quite at stanley the lack of money ironically improved the footy). Its gone silly money now and to me spoils it.
Posted via Mobile Device
Posted via Mobile Device
Ya he's talking sense Wyn
Case of "Kettle Calling The Pan" yon i reckon.
I'll believe that when it ever happens... mind you it's a good job they didn't have them rules back in 1994/95 eh!
Ya but there's a big difference to whats happening today, Arabs and Yanks buying clubs instead of toy train sets, at least Jack Walker was a life long Rovers fan, and money isn't the only think that wins titles, ask Newcastle, Liverpool, Leeds Spurs who've been throwing money at the prem for years any ain't won itI'll believe that when it ever happens... mind you it's a good job they didn't have them rules back in 1994/95 eh!
There ain't no difference.. and if start you start talking about life long supporters of clubs then let's talk those that play for the region they where born in.. I'll start with.. Wes Brown, Gary Neville, Paul Scholes, no player born in Lanchashire plays for RoversYa but there's a big difference to whats happening today, Arabs and Yanks buying clubs instead of toy train sets, at least Jack Walker was a life long Rovers fan, and money isn't the only think that wins titles, ask Newcastle, Liverpool, Leeds Spurs who've been throwing money at the prem for years any ain't won it
Rover's and Burnley employ players that ain't born and breed.. time to get hold of the fact you lot import your players.. nuff said
Last edited:
which is all irrelavant to n owner n club debt.
It's relevant when fans start slagging off what they call "big" clubs and claim they are the ones who play the game as it should be played ..but at the same time whinge about money problems.. it's all kak.. 30yrs ago there could be an argument about "local" teams being skint and claiming it's cos they had to rely on local support and local lads playing for them. there is a top team that for 30yrs have had good players from Lancashire playing for them and still do today.. more than can be said of Rovers, Burnley and Accy Stan.which is all irrelavant to n owner n club debt.
that i disagree with having watched rovers youth throughout 80s - early 90s, was plenty of local lads playing, the main differance being, most never made the grade, i put that down to the simple fact, that usually the best sign fer the glamour clubs.It's relevant when fans start slagging off what they call "big" clubs and claim they are the ones who play the game as it should be played ..but at the same time whinge about money problems.. it's all kak.. 30yrs ago there could be an argument about "local" teams being skint and claiming it's cos they had to rely on local support and local lads playing for them. there is a top team that for 30yrs have had good players from Lancashire playing for them and still do today.. more than can be said of Rovers, Burnley and Accy Stan.
to right..and if your's or mine had been picked up then you would want them to play for the big clubs..let's not take things away from the Lanc's lads.. Gerrard, Brown, Neville's, Rooney, Scholes, and even that scouse dog Carrager or whatever.. these are good players from Lancashire and they play for clubs that some people have a problem with.that i disagree with having watched rovers youth throughout 80s - early 90s, was plenty of local lads playing, the main differance being, most never made the grade, i put that down to the simple fact, that usually the best sign fer the glamour clubs.
Dont see any taking away from lancs lads, just dont see its owt to do wi massive club debts.to right..and if your's or mine had been picked up then you would want them to play for the big clubs..let's not take things away from the Lanc's lads.. Gerrard, Brown, Neville's, Rooney, Scholes, and even that scouse dog Carrager or whatever.. these are good players from Lancashire and they play for clubs that some people have a problem with.
Just shows how pathetic you really are Mancie, you call Carrager Scouse dog, what the hell is Rooney,to right..and if your's or mine had been picked up then you would want them to play for the big clubs..let's not take things away from the Lanc's lads.. Gerrard, Brown, Neville's, Rooney, Scholes, and even that scouse dog Carrager or whatever.. these are good players from Lancashire and they play for clubs that some people have a problem with.
