Detention without charge poll
- Thread starter andrewb
- Start date
i thought this was settled and the laws have been passed or are you just trying to stir up more anti labour thought
dont wory yourself most of us are fed up with them we dont need you to point out that they are making a cock up of things and besides i think most of us have more pressing issues than how long a terrorist can be held like price of food and fuel
if i am wrong and the issue hasnt been sorted yet please add another option - i couldnt give a toss so that everyone can vote
thankyou
dont wory yourself most of us are fed up with them we dont need you to point out that they are making a cock up of things and besides i think most of us have more pressing issues than how long a terrorist can be held like price of food and fuel
if i am wrong and the issue hasnt been sorted yet please add another option - i couldnt give a toss so that everyone can vote
thankyou
so that if you disagree with him he can put your name on a hit list lol
Its not anti labour no, I've met lots of Labour voters, and past and present Labour MP's who are against this legislation.
I voted “Opposed” because I think that it is wrong to detain someone for more than 24 hours without being charged. In fact I think that it is wrong to detain someone without arresting them for a specific crime.
But that is a typical loaded question andrewb and you could have put “Given half of those detained to 28 days were guilty, do you support or oppose increasing detention without charge to 42 days?”
The fact that half of those detained were innocent or guilty should have no bearing on the issue. But you have phrased the question to push people towards the oppose camp. But then that is what politicians and prospective politicians do when they favour a particular result and look to the electorate to go along with that view.
So that neither those for or against can say the poll is fixed as has been accused of national polls.
but is this poll relevant , we have had it before and discussed all the views from how an innocent man can be held without charge been disgusting to hold them as long as it takes to catch a terrorist
Please vote to support the increase, in the hope that someone will eventually get the message.
Even though, like Dickie Davis's by-election, it's all fairly pointless now, as the government won the vote to increase the time of suspected terrorists could be held without charge from 28 to 42 days.
Even though, like Dickie Davis's by-election, it's all fairly pointless now, as the government won the vote to increase the time of suspected terrorists could be held without charge from 28 to 42 days.
in agreement here
And if the poll is supposed to back up DD's stance then it's flawed anyway. It's only dealing with one subject when he 'allegedly' stood on many subjects
Vote in support then, as a protest.
Unlike the fiasco of a by-election we don't have the option of voting for a selection of other nutters.
And if the poll is supposed to back up DD's stance then it's flawed anyway. It's only dealing with one subject when he 'allegedly' stood on many subjects
Yes, he also wants to rename the Palace of Westminster as Winnie Mandela House.
Indeed I did it like that on purpose, to see what the reaction is once people understand that many are innocent. As many automatically see the word terrorist suspect and want to bang them up for life, but thats not what this legislation is about as I appreciate you understand Jambutty.
This question is nothing to do with the by-election, feel free to vote.
And if the poll is supposed to back up DD's stance then it's flawed anyway. It's only dealing with one subject when he 'allegedly' stood on many subjects
Let's just be glad Myra Hindley is dead and burned, otherwise Dickie Davis, the fighter for people's freedom, would be probably be trying to get her released.