WillowTheWhisp Resident Waffler Overlooker Apr 16, 2005 #62 This is driving me mad now because that answer sounds so feasable and yet it isn't the right one!
T Terry Local Weaver Apr 17, 2005 #70 Here's another go. If I call 'it' a thing we've got no-thing- on = Nothing on?
L Less Grand Wizard Of The Inner Clique Overlooker Apr 17, 2005 #71 Terry said: Here's another go. If I call 'it' a thing we've got no-thing- on = Nothing on? Click to expand... Wow! ten out of ten for effort, that is definately lateral thinking.
Terry said: Here's another go. If I call 'it' a thing we've got no-thing- on = Nothing on? Click to expand... Wow! ten out of ten for effort, that is definately lateral thinking.
T Terry Local Weaver Apr 17, 2005 #72 Yes Less, it certainly is . Willow remarked earlier that it was rather a sneaky one so I have started thinking that way. Whether or not it will do any good remains to be seen
Yes Less, it certainly is . Willow remarked earlier that it was rather a sneaky one so I have started thinking that way. Whether or not it will do any good remains to be seen
grannyclaret white rabbits Tackler Apr 17, 2005 #74 i have just got out of bed to put this,,,,its doing my head in lol It takes one to know one .......................................... Last edited: Apr 17, 2005
i have just got out of bed to put this,,,,its doing my head in lol It takes one to know one ..........................................
WillowTheWhisp Resident Waffler Overlooker Apr 17, 2005 #77 Nobody correct so far. Romps is getting further away.
Tinkerbelle Pillar o' t' Community Tackler Apr 17, 2005 #79 Here is another guess Willow, no it is on?