embarrasment

dont know which side of the story to believe,if the dinner ladies right the goveners should be removed BBC News - Bully-claim dinner lady sacked due to 'embarrassment'

So should the headmistress

She was suspended in June 2009 after telling parents that their seven-year-old daughter had been tied to a fence by a number of boys and hit with a skipping rope, the tribunal has heard.
'Minor accident'
Head teacher Deborah Crabb told the tribunal the incident was not bullying but an "inappropriate game" that went too far.
 
reading that the dinner lady was a plank, by going to the press, n agree wi lancsdave, the headmistress should be sacked also, seems the good name of the school takes priority oer bullying. also says the dinnerlady was on a final warning, so she aint mrs perfect.;)
 
.... also says the dinnerlady was on a final warning, so she aint mrs perfect.;)

No it does not, it says

Mrs Hill's decision to then speak to the parents at a scout meeting had been a breach of confidentiality which would have earned her a "final warning", said Mrs Crabb.

So she would have been given a final warning for discussing the matter with parents. It does not say she was on a final warning before the incident.
 
If a child of mine had been tied to some railings, and hit with as skipping rope, I wouldn't care who told me. I'd want to know.

A head teacher who described such an incident as an 'inappropriate game, that had gone too far', I'd like to tie to some railings, and hit with a skipping rope, so she too could enjoy the fun involved in such games.
 
To me the headmistress lives in cloud cuckoo land, if she thinks tying a kid to railings is a game that went wrong, and what message does it give to the kids if this is her attitude
 
To me the headmistress lives in cloud cuckoo land, if she thinks tying a kid to railings is a game that went wrong, and what message does it give to the kids if this is her attitude
Bang on, this stupid git is more at fault than the dinnerlady to me, but nowt will happen on that front.:(
 
So a group of boys tying a seven year old girl to railings is an 'inappropiate game'? The girl wanted to be tied to railings as part of the 'game' did she? If not it wasn't a game.And which part of the 'game' was 'inappropiate'-the tying up or the whipping?
What will the boys next 'game' be-a frightening thought. If lashing a tied up girl is a 'minor accident' what do they have to do to gain the headmistress's disapproval?
 
I would be more concerned if I was the parent, I wouldnt want my kids doing that to another child................:(
 
Back
Top