FAC vs Barnet

Watched the replay on redash's thread have to say Miles didnt protest about his sending off not a word but head in hands, think he was unlucky & normally a yellow would of sufficed.

We're no 57 in draw later, just hope we can really swat these bee's good and proper for being so jammy & forcing a replay when they were rubbish. Wonder who we will get?!
 
Having watched the replay on ITV (only chance as I was working yesterday) I have to say, I hope Stanley do appeal against the sending off because it looked nowhere near deliberate. As for the penalty, that was the softest decision I have seen in years. They were complaining about the appeals at Pompey v Man Utd but that one at the Crown looked nothing like a penalty, cheat fell over looking for something and the assistant duly obliged. Worst decision making I have seen ever and I wasn't there. No wonder JC was apoplectic in the post match interview with BBC Radio Lancs
 
Having watched the replay on ITV (only chance as I was working yesterday) I have to say, I hope Stanley do appeal against the sending off because it looked nowhere near deliberate. As for the penalty, that was the softest decision I have seen in years. They were complaining about the appeals at Pompey v Man Utd but that one at the Crown looked nothing like a penalty, cheat fell over looking for something and the assistant duly obliged. Worst decision making I have seen ever and I wasn't there. No wonder JC was apoplectic in the post match interview with BBC Radio Lancs

He was far from apologetic in The Gazelle afterwards :cursing: :cursing: :eek: That ref wouldn't want to meet up with Coley again too soon.
 
Last edited:
:confused::mad::confused: I was at the match and have watched the replays several tines in slow motion. Myles actually pulled out of the 50 - 50 tackle as usually does and jumped up to try to avoid contact but tne Barnet lad was coming through two footed. The only contact that Myles made was on the shin pads of ther lad. He did not appear to me to make any other contact. Their players did not seem to appeal for anything. The Ref simply got it wrong.:eek::eek::eek: Barnet first goal.. yes Symes was weaK at the post but their No 20 was fouling our new keeper in the centre of goal,, it should have been disallowed. Definately not a Pen .. Winnard had a super game.
V annoyed ,, Officials !!!!
 
Yep, big blue powerful Nissan coupe with personalised plate. How old is he? Must be paying a fortune for insurance.

We was laughing about that ! i bet his insurance is a few grand. The Car must of cost a few quid as well.

I could have one of them but i obviously prefer to drive my 8 year old VW Polo with 80k on the clock which is falling to bits !! ha ha
 
Having had the chance of seeing the "key" incidents on the gogglebox...no way was Miles deserving to be sent off,a yellow would have been more than enough..... and I struggled to even see where the foul was in the penalty incident.:mad:

If you're going to give penalties for those decisions then we'd be looking at at least half a dozen penalties a game !!!!:eek:

No wonder our esteemed leader has the record he has with match officials....Absolutely pathetic decisions. I played under better officials in the Blackburn Combination !!! :enough:

Whatever standard that bloke was supposed to be, I'd hope that he watched the replays of the said decisions and felt sick with embarassment.

He got two major decisions totally wrong and the two clowns who assisted him were no better...Oh for justice....and decent officials in the replay.:confused:
 
Forgot to say i support the one i pay good money to watch! and yerself Henry?:rolleyes:

I'm not too enthusiastic about resurrecting disagreements, but I've just noticed this post and I don't really understand what your point is, cashman.

However, I'll point out that my money is at least as 'good' as yours is.
Also (not that it's any of your or anyone else's business) I have not attended any football match in the last four years in which Accrington Stanley were not playing.

Does that deal with your snide inquiry or do you have a further agenda?
 
I'm not too enthusiastic about resurrecting disagreements, but I've just noticed this post and I don't really understand what your point is, cashman.

However, I'll point out that my money is at least as 'good' as yours is.
Also (not that it's any of your or anyone else's business) I have not attended any football match in the last four years in which Accrington Stanley were not playing.

Does that deal with your snide inquiry or do you have a further agenda?
oh its snide is it when i say it, but not when you did, sad git.:rolleyes:
 
i dunno??? i see man city at underhill or liverpool away anyone agree?

Complete the following well known advert slogan :

"Should've gone to.......??????":confused:

We'll be seeing the Gills on the 2nd of Jan !!!!:rolleyes:

Hopefully after stinging the bees again on the 19th of December !!!!!:D
 
oh its snide is it when i say it, but not when you did, sad git.:rolleyes:

Dear cashman,

I take it that that is your way of avoiding an uncomfortable question.

Well, during more than half a century of watching football I've encountered many instances of spectators criticizing their own team after a bad defeat, I've seen players who were already in tears being booed off the field, I've heard countless calls for X,Y or Z to be sacked.

But I have to admit that until now I've never heard or read a 'supporter' expressing his satisfaction that one of his own team's players has been injured.

That's what my comments have been about, and despite your pathetic efforts to sidetrack the issue, that's what it's still about.

Your apology (not to me but to Ian Dunbavin) will allow this correspondence to come to a close.

Yours sincerely,

A sad git - but one who understands the difference between right and wrong.
 
i understand exactly what yer comments were about Henry, it was a tongue in cheek comment, my sense of humour, the fact that you cannot grasp it, makes no differance at all to me, so as fer an apology, "Kiss My Ass":rolleyes:
 
Back
Top