Fleetwood thread

Interesting comments frank,just for your info,if you pm me,I will scan you my qualifications just to clear that up.FYI i played semi pro football and pro rugby,that's means nothing
On my coaching cv,I have 15 lads who got signed up(our capt will confirm that),that meaning nothing!,but if you have been involved in coaching,I am amazed with your comments,
Your right , I disagreed with a lot of Charlie Hughes ideas,but others swore by them,coaching and tactics is subjective.
Interested to here who you managed and played for,I am 50 years old and am familiar with most leagues/academies,maybe we have common ground ,look forward to your reply
 
FrankMoody said:
If you read my post again you'll realise I didnt say tactics and formations are are drivel, I actually said there had been a lot of drivel written about them on here - get your facts right.

Just to put your mind at rest I'm an ex-pro and ex manager with a UEFA coaching qualification, and actually at one of the pro clubs I played for virtually all we did was play 5 a side and a few doggies!

methinks you are are the one with a lack of knowledge my friend and you come on here trying to bafffle with bullsh1t, please feel free to carry on because it definitely makes me smile!!
Click to expand...

FrankMoody said:
In the words of Roy Walker 'say what you see'!

Are they above criticism? Why shouldnt I knock them? I dont know them, I am a spectator, I pay my money and follow the team, my feelings for Stanley far outweigh any 'fellow comrade' superficial loyalty you hint at
Click to expand...

O.K. what i mean is simple to understand, Yeh say in yer opinion theres a lot of drivel written about it on here, As a spectator same as i, yer entitled to yer opinion, But by stating yer qualifications then i mean thats a bit more, its talking down to people as far as i'm concerned, In my opinion most ex pros do not knock other pros, so to me yer in a minority in that respect, or yer full of bull, i don't know which, is that clear enough fer yeh?
 
SamF said:
I think its the common factor of fat strikers scoring hattricks against us
Click to expand...


.Sam !. Apart from Aki..Aki.. You know that big lad at Northampton !!....I can't actually remember that many fat strikers scoring Hat-tricks against the Reds !!.

And Jon Parkin fat ???....Well ?... Able-bodied, athletic, beefcake, beefy, big, brawny, bruising, bulky, gorillalike, hefty, hulking, hulky, hunk, muscular, powerful, stocky, strapping, strong, sturdy, well-built he certainly is....But from where I was sitting last night definitely NOT Fat !!.

So that just leaves us with young Saheed Adebayo the scourge of Sixfields who I would describe using the old Lancashire-ism as being merely 'Stiff-built' rather than 'FAT'...would you agree ??.
 
I want a stewards enquiry about his height,he looked 7'-4" to me.Quote of the night was a young kid who shouted to him whilst he was waiting to take a throw - " hey,no Parkin here tonight ! ",made him smile,came across as a decent bloke
 
Just viewed the goals and to be fair the first was a great ball and even better finish,the second we lost possession(Bocco) on the half way line and were done with a early thro ball before we could react,the last,although a decent cross and flick,the keeper will have nightmares at getting beaten at the near post from six yards out and nearly on the bye line .
 
To be honest i'm a Boco fan, but fail to grasp how he got MoM, when to my mind the second goal really did us up like a kipper.:(
 
To be fair cashy he showed a lot of effort,not everything came off,but I don't mind that.Thought Liddle had a great game,but the defence splitting pass was from his man ( brown),cutting inside for the first goal.
Toss up between those two for me
 
Liddle n Hunt to me were 2 that came out of that wi any credit. i would have edged liddle, Boco had a great move n shot in second half which probably got him the award? but fer my money the 2nd goal destroyed us n i think probably heads dropped n cost the match.
 
Shakers views,as always,are spot on.To be fair cashy,on the night,my first reaction was it was crap defending,but after viewing it you have to give credit to the ball and Parkin .
Just before the ballis passed,you would be happy with the line and positions of the back four,but with a drop of the shoulder he pulled off deano and he knew he couldn't take a touch and passed/volleyed into the far corner whilst facing away from goal--credit were credits due.
If you were being really critical,maybe hunt and deans gap could have been tighter,
 
Dean Winnard had one of the worst performances in a stanley shirt ive seen. He couldnt mark, he looked clumsy, he couldnt pass the ball, he couldnt find feet! Hes extrememly unreliable!! Id rather have his pace as a winger! Should of stuck Murphy there , least he looks comfortable!

Funniest bit of Deans performance was when in the box he needed to clear it out and instead of using his left foot to just hoof it clear he liked toe popped it out over the cowshed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top