Impossible headlines..

Exile on Spencer St said:
This thread is supposed to be 'impossible' headlines...don't tempt fate.
I've been worrying all day that the 'commemorative' ticket announcement was just a media smokescreen pending Stanley's greatest public relations coup...announcing they've signed Mr.Evans:eek:
Click to expand...

He deserves a second chance, if he's cheap enough, wasn't moly recently released when we signed him the first time around
 
cashman said:
Pathetic in my view, what about the victim? He deserves sod .all, or is it not a serious enough crime?
Click to expand...

The victim admitted she was drunk and couldn't remember the whole night, if he really was that guilty surely he would of served his full sentence and not just half
 
st06nc2 said:
The victim admitted she was drunk and couldn't remember the whole night, if he really was that guilty surely he would of served his full sentence and not just half
Click to expand...
Guilty is guilty, i.e proved beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law - really don't think his sentence was shortened just in case he was a little bit innocent :rolleyes:
 
AccyMad said:
Guilty is guilty, i.e proved beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law
Click to expand...
If only that was always the case, Accy Mad. Many, many miscarriages of justice have occured over the years, some of which have cost lives, and not just loss of a livelihood. I'm no cheerleader for Evans but if you read the transcript of his trial you would have to agree that he has a reasonable case for appeal, and that explains why he cannot be expected to apologise to the claimant. There is also the question of evidence which was unavailable at the trial. I.e., postings on Twitter which were deleted by the claimant but which are still showing on servers in the USA
These suggest that she was set on a course of entrapment by "landing a big one this time" and " and "going to get 2 pink Minis".
 
Redraine said:
If only that was always the case, Accy Mad. Many, many miscarriages of justice have occured over the years, some of which have cost lives, and not just loss of a livelihood. I'm no cheerleader for Evans but if you read the transcript of his trial you would have to agree that he has a reasonable case for appeal, and that explains why he cannot be expected to apologise to the claimant. There is also the question of evidence which was unavailable at the trial. I.e., postings on Twitter which were deleted by the claimant but which are still showing on servers in the USA
These suggest that she was set on a course of entrapment by "landing a big one this time" and " and "going to get 2 pink Minis".
Click to expand...
Whats very hard for me to grasp about this,is the simple fact our "Press" aint latched on to this?? cos that would sell papers!!
 
40% of the Stanley v Man U useless tickets sold to a man in Brazil according to Peter Marsden.

Not to that Colin Swindelhurst fruit juice fella surely?
 
Redraine said:
If only that was always the case, Accy Mad. Many, many miscarriages of justice have occured over the years, some of which have cost lives, and not just loss of a livelihood. I'm no cheerleader for Evans but if you read the transcript of his trial you would have to agree that he has a reasonable case for appeal, and that explains why he cannot be expected to apologise to the claimant. There is also the question of evidence which was unavailable at the trial. I.e., postings on Twitter which were deleted by the claimant but which are still showing on servers in the USA
These suggest that she was set on a course of entrapment by "landing a big one this time" and " and "going to get 2 pink Minis".
Click to expand...
I know there are many miscarriages of justice Redraine, what got my goat was the suggestion by the poster that Ched Evans' sentence had been reduced because there was some doubt as to his guilt - my point was if there'd been any doubt in the jury's minds he wouldn't have been convicted in the first place.
There maybe some room for controversy in that verdict but until (if) it is overturned I do not think he should be able to return to football - then again I felt the same about Lee Hughes & that goalie, McCormick? & they seem to have been allowed to pursue their careers - indeed I think Hughes thrives on the stick he gets from opposition fans about it, sick in my mind!
 
cashman said:
Whats very hard for me to grasp about this,is the simple fact our "Press" aint latched on to this?? cos that would sell papers!!
Click to expand...
The press have to be very mindful of the possibility of being in breach of the contempt of court rules in cases which are still under review. Here are the facts as per the court case. Judge for yourself, but make yourself a nice cup of tea and be prepared for a long read!

https://www.crimeline.info/case/r-v-ched-evans-chedwyn-evans
 
Redraine said:
The press have to be very mindful of the possibility of being in breach of the contempt of court rules in cases which are still under review. Here are the facts as per the court case. Judge for yourself, but make yourself a nice cup of tea and be prepared for a long read!

https://www.crimeline.info/case/r-v-ched-evans-chedwyn-evans
Click to expand...
Well that i aint too sure about either, It aint stopped em wi a far more high profile Royal member of society these last few days,ok it aint a court matter, but yon lot are a damn site more powerful in my view.
 
Redraine said:
There is also the question of evidence which was unavailable at the trial. I.e., postings on Twitter which were deleted by the claimant but which are still showing on servers in the USA
These suggest that she was set on a course of entrapment by "landing a big one this time" and " and "going to get 2 pink Minis".
Click to expand...
Can it be conclusively proved that she was the author of these postings????
Perhaps it couldn't which would make them inadmissible as evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top