Licence's

No not interested...SUI JURIS
clear.gif

Which is probably why not many people on here are interested in you or your views.
 
This discussion about common law has been covered before in a thread started by Kenny. We have already had the arguments for and against. You might want to look it up, Chris, if you are interested.

Which is probably why not many people on here are interested in you or your views.

I prefer Admiral/Maritime Law,Natural Law,corporate law and legalese. the things that seem to help me ;)
 
If we didn't have the TV licence then BBC would have ad breaks. Having no ad breaks to me is a good reason to pay for a TV licence.
 
A group of sexually abused persons are suing the BBC.
Since the BBC's income is from Licence fees, substantial damages could cause an increase in licence fees.

There is a growing number of people who have declared that they intend to stop paying the fee.

I forsee that the end of the BBC is in sight.
 
I predict the same to be honest Margaret, this is one hell of a blow for BBC.

There should have a choice on your tv to void the BBC channels and then you dont have to pay.
I wouldnt miss the BBC to be honest, the only thing I really watch on there is the odd drama that comes up and stictly sometimes if I am in. ITV and others channels are far better with the choice.
 
If we didn't have the TV licence then BBC would have ad breaks. Having no ad breaks to me is a good reason to pay for a TV licence.

Maybe for you but I watch other channels more than the BBC.

It also annoys me that there is no BBC1 +1 when many other channels have this.

BBC radio stations are another money pit with presenters paid far more than independent stations for a lot less work.
 
Yeah I use the +1 channels alot and they are worth having.

Watching the thing on BBC News now, BBC are saying that they regret going ahead with the Saville tribute that they aired. No poo Sherlock!
 
I see the thief is still at it.
Well for those interested, here is a link, explaining the concepts he hold dear.
Freeman on the land - RationalWiki

Of course words are not very effective

First off your assumptions that i'm a thief are total bull...proof,evidence? if you feel that strong about it i can meet you at greenbank police station and we can see if i'm a thief ;)

Secondly tho i may share some views that are similar to the Freetard bull that's not what i'm about so don't put me in that category.can we go back to the topic now?.......cheers ;)
 
If we didn't have the TV licence then BBC would have ad breaks. Having no ad breaks to me is a good reason to pay for a TV licence.

Just for a few of channels?.. Nah. I can't agree with that

Of course words are not very effective

These ideas are most attractive to desperate, vulnerable people who are going through terrible times in their lives."[13] If someone is selling a simple explanation of why your life is messed up, the false hope it offers is extremely attractive — even if the explanation is complete rubbish and the suggested actions consistently just don't work

sounds about right to me...
 
Just for a few of channels?.. Nah. I can't agree with that

sounds about right to me...

It depends what system you have and what is available - for example if you have these new Tivo boxes you can record TV and watch later etc and then skip ad breaks. But if you just have basic free-view box etc then having a channel with no ad breaks is beneficial. Particularly when you just want to watch a program uninterupted. But the more technology you have then the more BBC becomes irrelevant I suppose.
 
Last edited:
The thing is this, if you use something that does not belong to you, example the service the BBC or the United utilities provide for a cost. Then you are stealing, this makes you a thief.

If our thief has issue with this, then maybe he should consider paying his way. Much like the rest of us.

Btw ignoring this person is great. No stress at all
 
The thing is this, if you use something that does not belong to you, example the service the BBC or the United utilities provide for a cost. Then you are stealing, this makes you a thief.

If our thief has issue with this, then maybe he should consider paying his way. Much like the rest of us.

Btw ignoring this person is great. No stress at all


What If you have a issue with a service provider? Do you still carry on paying because the rest do?
Like I've said before I'm willing to pay for a water service, but only after they give me a few answers and if they can't give me those answers i stop paying for that service till they do...simples

As for tv lie-sense i think we've covered that one :rolleyes:

BTW I'm not a 'PERSON' ;)
 
We live in a world where over 780 million people do not have access to clean drinking water.
Yet here we have a 'person' or what ever he /she/it wants to be? Claiming that united utilities do not provide water that is to his* exacting standards, what ever they are. We are not privy to these, after all they are more than likely rubbish.
Yet this person* is more than happy to carry on receiving this and also having any waste water removed and treated. Furthermore he* is taking the high ground in claiming he* is in the right. Despite the water companies having to provide water to exacting standards as laid out by the WHO, this person* knows better.
Then there is the issue of TV licence, do I want one, no, but I pay it.
I could list many reasons why and in the light of recent scandals at the BBC one wonders, but it ones own to this, I want to live in this society we have in the UK and as such I pay my way.
This person* obviously knows better than the rest of us or is a complete.....well I would rather not say.

*please refer to the second sentence, as he* is not a person he*. Must not be of this earth

Just to say, this is the Oxford Dictionary definition of Person

Definition of person
noun (plural people or persons)
human being regarded as an individual


Obviously he* is not human
 
Last edited:
if you use the service then you should pay for it, if you dont pay but still use it then its theft? you cant refuse to pay for something because you dont agree with it, tst like going to asda, taking a trolley full but not paying becuase you dont agree with asdas prices?

if you dont like it then dont watch it, simple
 
Of course if Chris decides to claim Person is a legal term using Blacks Legal Dictionary, there's not much to say....except it is not a book used in English Law, the Law Society have over 3500 volumes they refer to.
But the Freeman of the Land movement don't recognise this, still they have not had any real success in UK court of law even though they don't believe in them.
 
Back
Top