Licence's

I never really trusted em anyway, Trust in my eyes is like many things in life, Has to be earn t, not a god given right.
 
Please avoid donations to Childline/NSPCC.

Mandelson is one of their chiefs, and your hair would curl if you have read what I have about him.:eek:

That child actor who named a current cabinet minister, also revealed what happened at a party in Esther Rancid's new forest home.

Whilst these two are under suspicion, please don't bolster their image by donations.

The BBC charity Children in Need should be axed too.

They used Saville for fundraising - they have lost credibility.
 
MargaretR said:
Please avoid donations to Childline/NSPCC.

Mandelson is one of their chiefs, and your hair would curl if you have read what I have about him.:eek:

That child actor who named a current cabinet minister, also revealed what happened at a party in Esther Rancid's new forest home.

Whilst these two are under suspicion, please don't bolster their image by donations.

The BBC charity Children in Need should be axed too.

They used Saville for fundraising - they have lost credibility.
Click to expand...

I agree about Childline/NSPCC i was thinking happen more local ....maundy grange maybe :eek::eek:...or maybe just keeping it for yourself ;)

feel free to add any hair curling links :)
 
"worse revelations are yet to come and you will understand in a year why we closed News Of The World" -Rebecca Brooks
 

Attachments

  • crystaltipps.jpg
    crystaltipps.jpg
    11.3 KB · Views: 5
annesingleton said:
But if you watch tv and don't pay your licence it's illegal and works out more expensive than if you just pay it in the first place.
Click to expand...

Illegal? Only if you contract with the salesman that comes knocking.

If there is such a law, why don't they just fine the person registered as living at that address? Or write to that person by name and not just an "to the occupier" letter? And why when they call do they just go away when advised you do not wish to contract and you are not obliged to talk to them?

I feel many more will also boycott paying soon.
 
Last edited:
Today, as Entwistle leaves with his years salary reward for 56 days of incompetance, the BBC news seems to be reporting little news but its own internal staff moves.

Let the ship sink for goodness sake - I am sick of paying £12 a month for these creeps to massage their egos.
 
MargaretR said:
Today, as Entwistle leaves with his years salary reward for 56 days of incompetance, the BBC news seems to be reporting little news but its own internal staff moves.

Let the ship sink for goodness sake - I am sick of paying £12 a month for these creeps to massage their egos.
Click to expand...

I doubt that it would be allowed to sink, it would be sold to the highest bidder no doubt with some Government grant to help it on it's way, which could free us from the £12 a month but what would be the hidden costs for the taxpayer?
 
£185,000 of our licence fee money is being handed to that Lewd person (who they didn't name).

That Lewd person has had his wiki page pruned recently to remove the info that he is a keen collector of Graham Ovenden 'art'.

If he is an 'artist' you haven't heard of you can google the Tate gallery.
(I don't put the link here because this is a family site)

http://www.thisiscornwall.co.uk/Jud...trial-halted/story-11434421-detail/story.html
 
Last edited:
You may recall the BBC reporting the collapse of trade centre building 7,
23 minutes before it happened.

BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE - YouTube

On 25th Feb a man has had a prosecution for having no TV licence, abandoned on the basis that the BBC had prior knowledge of a terrorist event, which they didn't report, in contravention of section 38 of the Terrorism Act.
FREE PLANET: Tony Rooke wins his TV License case by stating the BBC were complicit in 9/11.

Also, the Tate gallery has now removed public access to Graham Ovenden 'art' following his very recent conviction for paedophilia.
 
From your own link - :rolleyes:
"He imposed a six month conditional discharge, with £200 legal costs.

Outside court, Rooke said the case had been a ‘score draw’ since the judge had looked at the evidence - albeit in private - and had decided not to fine him.

He called for anyone who has evidence which challenges the official version of the 9/11 terrorist attacks to pass it to the authorities.
 
Your clutching at straws here Maragret.
You started by saying the man had won, no mention of any costs or conditional discharge.
This is a non starter and I will not be drawn in, the man lost, he got a Six month conditional discharge.
 
Boeing Guy said:
Your clutching at straws here Maragret.
You started by saying the man had won, no mention of any costs or conditional discharge.
This is a non starter and I will not be drawn in, the man lost, he got a Six month conditional discharge.
Click to expand...
Take no notice Si, if it keeps her happy just nurture her:rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top