Match Coverage - Your Thoughts

on seeing christies Child post.
I decided to look at the Morecambe set up.
for a fee of £4.49 a month or £37.99 direct debit a year
they offer
Live audio commentary
Works on Mac and PC worldwide
Match and extended highlights
High quality 1.8MB Flash stream
Dan this looks like a very good set up, would this be possible for our site ?

The majority find the service brilliant, even better when the commentators add a touch of humour which our guys do. The club provide the service FOC to ALL season ticket holders which makes it a brilliant deal. Would recommend it to you guys!
 
Out of curiosity Kiwi would you be interested in a non-live recording of the commentary?
As in you good sleep in - get the commentary and then listen to it as it happened?

WTF???!!!--Whats a 'sleep in'??? Haven't done one of those for 30 years.. :(

" NO", I wouldn't listen to a delayed commentary,live yes, delayed no. Straight to the FT result.
 
in answer to the question of whether we could have the same player type facility as Morecambe with all the footage etc, I would imagine there's a big no in there somewhere. As the FL own the rights to broadcasts you would need to be tied into some sort of FL deal - and that's what the player is. If you notice all these other club websites are identikit sites with just the content and colouring changed to suit. Stanley have never been interested in that probably because you have to waiver a lot of the advertising revenue from it and have little or no control over its' content beyond news. That was the story in 2006 when we got promoted and I can't see that it would have changed much
 
in answer to the question of whether we could have the same player type facility as Morecambe with all the footage etc, I would imagine there's a big no in there somewhere. As the FL own the rights to broadcasts you would need to be tied into some sort of FL deal - and that's what the player is. If you notice all these other club websites are identikit sites with just the content and colouring changed to suit. Stanley have never been interested in that probably because you have to waiver a lot of the advertising revenue from it and have little or no control over its' content beyond news. That was the story in 2006 when we got promoted and I can't see that it would have changed much

I read with interest but where do you obtain the facts & in formation on the cost & wavering advertising revenue
 
Back
Top