But surely a state of nothingness is a void ? A vacuum, where nothing can exist ...... so ? Or are you aligning yourself with the Gods ?![]()
Plural?
No.
There's only me, in my state of nothingness.

But surely a state of nothingness is a void ? A vacuum, where nothing can exist ...... so ? Or are you aligning yourself with the Gods ?![]()

Plural?![]()
(even the Church of Icke, should you be that way inclined
)But surely a state of nothingness is a void ? A vacuum, where nothing can exist ...... so ? Or are you aligning yourself with the Gods ?![]()
That's pretty montheistic
Aye, plural my friend. There are many religions, for example, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindi, and some funny shaped stone the Bush men worship in the back of beyond to name a few, so yes plural.(even the Church of Icke, should you be that way inclined
)

We had a similar thread, started by MargR;
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f71/what-does-your-avatar-say-about-you-41465.html
Will you stop trying to get this thread from wandering?
Rindy's nothingness is far too important.

Exactly.
I've only not changed my avatar at the moment, because 'nothing' seems suitable.
![]()

Try looking at "Nothing" by The Script -lovely song, nice lyrics...sometimes Nothing can mean something...Exactly.
I've only not changed my avatar at the moment, because 'nothing' seems suitable.
![]()
A singularity, maybeThat's pretty montheistic
![]()
I would agree that in "Rindiworld" as seen by himself there is just him, alone at the beginning of all creation
but in "Our World" I accept there are those that believe in various deities who govern & control their existence & as such said deities are seen as responsible for an individuals personal fortunes/misfortunes.
Maybe, maybe not. As to montheistic, had you said monotheisticI would agree that in "Rindiworld" as seen by himself there is just him, alone at the beginning of all creation
but in "Our World" I accept there are those that believe in various deities who govern & control their existence & as such said deities are seen as responsible for an individuals personal fortunes/misfortunes.
I on the other hand believe in me, my family & friends & what I see & experience around me. Should some misfortune befall me, I'm pretty sure I can trace it back to some mundane influence & not some supernatural, omnipotent entity & should I enjoy good fortune I would place that as the result of my own endeavours & happy circumstance.![]()

That's what's known as a 'joke' in 'Rindiworld'.![]()

I'm aware & in "Our World" our tongue was firmly in our cheek when making said statement.![]()

Sometimes less is more.![]()

No worries - I'll shut up then ! - Short enough ?![]()


Maybe, maybe not. As to montheistic, had you said monotheisticI would agree that in "Rindiworld" as seen by himself there is just him, alone at the beginning of all creation
but in "Our World" I accept there are those that believe in various deities who govern & control their existence & as such said deities are seen as responsible for an individuals personal fortunes/misfortunes.
I on the other hand believe in me, my family & friends & what I see & experience around me. Should some misfortune befall me, I'm pretty sure I can trace it back to some mundane influence & not some supernatural, omnipotent entity & should I enjoy good fortune I would place that as the result of my own endeavours & happy circumstance.![]()
basically I've been told to wind me neck in 
A thread about "annoying" avatars;
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f71/what-avatars-annoy-you-42255.html


Don't worry about it Eric, see post #94basically I've been told to wind me neck in
![]()

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.