On behalf statement

[Stanleymad]

RE: thread O'Neils statement

It has been removed at request by the club so the approved version will be posted soon and can be posted here too no probs, best see fishy site for details when the details have been edited on.

Please dont re post until official confirmation has been made otherwise i have to delete it as no permission has granted. As a few people have tried to post it & i've had to remove it im afraid.

Sorry im put inbetween, have to do whats right as far as any legalities go.

 

[Nickelson]

shame it was a cracking read, I wonder what the new version will say.

 

[Redash]

Oh dear, media censorship? the first step to total control?

 

[shakermaker]

"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?"

 

[Nickelson]

The article is still availible from certain sources .

 

[Wynonie Harris]

They can't even do that right...you've gotta laugh, or else you'd cry!

 

[cashman]

shame it was a cracking read, I wonder what the new version will say.

Hope someones copied the old un, could be interesting.

 

[cashman]

they have.

 

[Stanleymad]

My hands are a little tied with this as could be legal issue for owner of this site, altho they did post it on the fishy site its a grey area atm. Can only hope the club re posts it edited as required soon.
Posted via Mobile Device

 

[Nickelson]

The arcticle is still on their website it is just removed from the homepage. So as far as im aware there should be no issue.

 

[Stanleymad]

Yeah i noticed i can access the original link but cannot access from home page so begs its removed from public view but only from history database. Thats the bit im trying to ascertain.
Posted via Mobile Device

 

[Wynonie Harris]

You really couldn't make it up, could you?

(Sorry, SM, not getting at you, you're obviously right to err on the side of caution).

 

[Doug]

I appear to have missed all this; what statement are you on about and what have I missed.

 

[Doug]

Intresting. It would seem the natural way to go, just wish I had a pot............

 

[shakermaker]

I appear to have missed all this; what statement are you on about and what have I missed.

1) DO posts a statement on the official website.
2) DO pulls down said statement shortly afterwards for an as yet unknown reason.
3) In between (1) and (2), some access the site and read the statement. One member of this forum posts a link to the piece.
4) DO tells Stanleymad to remove the link from this forum.

About as clear as mud? Have a drink! Join the party on the old (sinking) ship Stanley.

 

[Stanleymad]

It wasn't DO that posted it on site it was done by accident by our junior media person, as was told to me.
Posted via Mobile Device

 

[shakermaker]

Just meant that DO authored the piece SM

 

[Doug]

1) Have a drink! Join the party on the old (sinking) ship Stanley.

Been on that for forty odd years.

 

[MartynBiddulph]

It was my error. I posted it on the site before was checked and approved, the full story should be on tonight/early tomorrow.

 

[lancsdave]

Personally I don't think Stanley are in a position to put a bid in for Rooney & Ronaldo but lets wait for the full story