On behalf statement

[Stanleymad]

Thanks for clearing it up and hope the edited article is up soon

 

[ukcowboy]

It was my error. I posted it on the site before was checked and approved, the full story should be on tonight/early tomorrow.

Fair play Martyn, however I can't wait to see the edited version after reading the original, it should be interesting

 

[DAV007]

Please PM me the article/statement

thanks in advance.

 

[Kiwi John]

And PM to me too please...

 

[stanleyhouse]

It was my error. I posted it on the site before was checked and approved, the full story should be on tonight/early tomorrow.

I read the original too and my post was deleted.
I was lucky to copy it in time and send it to a few friends.
Nice try Martyn... So when were you meant to post it?
When O'Neill and Heys were in Devon tomorrow out of the way maybe?

 

[Stanleymad]

I had to delete it not really much choice in the matter. Personally think matters are much worse for the club because of all the fuss they made rather than just leaving be imho.<br />
<i>Posted via Mobile Device</i>

 

[shakermaker]

No one's having a pop at you SM. DO should never have put you in the middle.

 

[bdc]

Can someone PM me the original statement?

 

[Stanleymad]

No one's having a pop at you SM. DO should never have put you in the middle.

Don didn't call me personally that was delegated or got to before he saw it by dept responsible, just to clear that part up.

Posted via Mobile Device

 

[MartynBiddulph]

Could I request that we draw a line under this till the morning please? The statement will be practically the same as the original when it is posted on the website tomorrow, just with a few additions to it that I didn't include.

 

[Stanleymad]

In all honesty Martyn as much as i can police things here on main forums - i cant police inboxes unless threatening abuse is directly caused by members here.
Posted via Mobile Device

 

[Wynonie Harris]

I'll tell you summat...it just shows that the club are keeping an eye on us. Both times it was posted on here, it was gone within minutes!

We are being watched!

 

[shakermaker]

You'd have thought they'd have better things to do, really. What with getting that embargo lifted by tomorrow.

 

[ukcowboy]

You'd have thought they'd have better things to do, really. What with getting that embargo lifted by tomorrow.

Good grief, have " two weeks " passed already? I must have blinked and missed one!!!!

 

[bdc]

I think me may be best waiting to see what the revised statement says tomorrow then we can see what can be gauged from it. I get the feeling that what we see tomorrow will be slightly different though!

 

[Wynonie Harris]

You'd have thought they'd have better things to do, really. What with getting that embargo lifted by tomorrow.

...hmmm...could the release of the D'on's statement, now postponed until the following day, be a smokescreen to deflect from the fact that the accounts aren't in fact going to be submitted tomorrow after all?...or will I be eating my words 24 hours from now? Cynical?...moi?

 

[LongLostSon]

Could I request that we draw a line under this till the morning please? The statement will be practically the same as the original when it is posted on the website tomorrow, just with a few additions to it that I didn't include.

I think it's Stanley policy to give supporters sleepless nights - now what ? I'm thinking - have Fleetwood made a takeover bid ?

 

[Pendle Red]

Have I missed summat?

 

[Wynonie Harris]

Could I request that we draw a line under this till the morning please? The statement will be practically the same as the original when it is posted on the website tomorrow, just with a few additions to it that I didn't include.

Never mind, Martyn, one day when you're chief foreign correspondent for the Times, you'll look back on this and laugh!

 

[AccyMad]

Have I missed summat?

Check your e-mails PR