same 11 for me as well. Play your strongest side BUT if a player isn't performing as well as he could for whatever reason then you have to leave him out. That was the issue with Jimmy Ryan a few games ago. He looked like he was carrying a knock but played through it. but for those few games he looked off the pace. The quesiton is whether a part fit Jimmy Ryan is still better than what we have on the bench? Or whether it is worth the gamble that he might get further injured and play no part in the future games?
Yesterday was a game where too many players didn't get the chance to influence the game, such as Craney. Is that an ideal opportunity for Razor to come on and try to secure a new contract? You've got to worry that Coley perhaps doesn't rate certain players and that they won't get any chance at all unless we lose various players this summer - and then we are left with unrated players who mightn't be that inclined to play for us.
Who'd 'ave thowt it at start of t'season ehh? I agree that both Macc and Oxford seemed to have a plan to close us down and Macc did so particularly effectively. However, in both games we still had enough chances to win both games fairly comfortably. At this stage of the seaason the weather becomes a factor too. It could be that some players are looking a bit tired and we have played lots of matches since the New Year, probably more than any team in our division. If you played football at a half decent standard you might remember how temperatures even of around 15 deg C can radically effect how you play... Certainly our high tempo...covering the ground... running into spaces...high passing rate style of play can be affected. I agree with some observations that using subs could/should be an option at this time of the year. Clearly when one or two players appear to be suffering a bit 
after 10 to 15 minutes in the 2nd half then we should make some changes. Players like Putterill, Boluding, Turner etc must be champing at the bit to get on and have a crack at showing the managers and fans what they have to offer.
Putterill in particular could have provided an explosive change of pace and in my opinion would have seriously challenged the defences of both Macc and Oxford. I too would keep starting with same eleven but would welcome some earlier use of the subs to maintain the pressure on opponents. Let's all keep positive and get right behind the boys!! Come on you REDS!!



it is macca, but yeh must surely have a PlanB to adapt to varying surfaces?its a perfectly valid argument Cashy. If one team is particularly adept at playing fast free flowing football but the extra touch slows everything down then the advantage is lost is it not?



We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.