Port Vale Thread
- Thread starter Dan
- Start date
Reamer,all i was doing was giving my opinion on your post " it was a poor performance tonight" and "they played good footy", If we dont have many shots and they dont either(check the match stats,acci nearly double theres),why were we poor and them good?
I accept a couple of players may have not have performed to there normal levels,but to say it was poor was a bit harsh as i couldnt see anybody not trying,even if on the night it wasnt coming off for them
I accept a couple of players may have not have performed to there normal levels,but to say it was poor was a bit harsh as i couldnt see anybody not trying,even if on the night it wasnt coming off for them
All you can do is give your opinion, football19, and yours differs from mine. This forum is full of opinions on all sorts of topics but to say someone's 'having a go' just because they have a different opinion to you is out of order. I had an opinion and I gave my reasons, now if I were to call someone I was chatting to 'a plonker' without justification, I would consider that 'having a go'
Anyway you've neglected to mention that I also gave some positives in my original post, which is more ,apparently, than JC could do in his post match reflections
By the way, I didn't consult the match stats before forming my impression of the game. My opinion was based on what I saw
Anyway you've neglected to mention that I also gave some positives in my original post, which is more ,apparently, than JC could do in his post match reflections
By the way, I didn't consult the match stats before forming my impression of the game. My opinion was based on what I saw
Ooops that was a costly defeat, you lost out on your cup final
Do you already know who we would have got in the fourth round?
Wouldn't have happened Dave Stanley's number would have been 1 and would be at home to dirty LeedsOoops that was a costly defeat, you lost out on your cup final
Wouldn't have happened Dave Stanley's number would have been 1 and would be at home to dirty Leeds
Not this round, numbers were done last week. Port vale or Accrington were always number 60
Ooops that was a costly defeat, you lost out on your cup final
Where were they published, Dave?
Last edited:
Reamer,you did make some fair points,but what i said was you was "a bit harsh",not out of order,on this occasion we will agree to disagree !!!!,
I also thought JCs comments were harsh,but he will have his reasons( probably hates losing!),at least we agreed Barnett had a top game,so we had something in common !
I also thought JCs comments were harsh,but he will have his reasons( probably hates losing!),at least we agreed Barnett had a top game,so we had something in common !
I guess the FA published them on Tuesday, thats the day they were on Clarets Mad board
Sorry Dave didn't know that, so Stanley have missed the chance of visiting Anfield in round 4
Sorry Dave didn't know that, so Stanley have missed the chance of visiting Anfield in round 4
In a strange sort of way it might not be a bad thing. Lack of cup money might actually be better in the long run if it brings things to a head sooner