If you think what you've said is acceptable then there's no hope, which is a shame.
Racist Incident?
- Thread starter st06nc2
- Start date
- Status
Some may regard that as insulting, but i dont cos i aint a tart.
Its acceptable if you say summat, yet others like me who call a spade a spade offend those i regard as tarts, thats a shame also.
I've called you out on your adolescent posts and you can't take it, simple as. Your nonsense is why many decent posters have left this forum, but I suppose that's because they haven't got the 'guts' to read your posts isn't it cashman? Or maybe it's because they're 'tarts'?
Sad how a grown up can act in such a way; especially sad when it's someone who now puts a lot of time into the club we share support of.
Sad how a grown up can act in such a way; especially sad when it's someone who now puts a lot of time into the club we share support of.
I suppose my nonsense is why the ultras forum died a death?
or perhaps some people just grew out of things? i dont know really, but obviously one as clever as you knows. Blame me as well fer why yer blog got stick, which off me it didn't. yeh really are getting a pathetic little runt shaker, thats sad to me,
so I'm confused now, did a racist remark not take place?
By the Newport player,first, which was reported to 4 people, yet no-one at our club said they knew owt about it.
It would be helpful if those in possession of the facts that apparently didn't make it into court or maybe just not into the report of court proceedings would enlighten the rest of us, who otherwise are likely to believe what we read, thereby turning ourselves into tarts and runts who ought to keep our gobs shut if what we read upsets us. Hints about dark secrets really aren't helpful.
Cashy's last post arrived after I started this, but still leaves us guessing as to what was said, and why it provoked the response which obviously was reported.
Cashy's last post arrived after I started this, but still leaves us guessing as to what was said, and why it provoked the response which obviously was reported.
By the Newport player,first, which was reported to 4 people, yet no-one at our club said they knew owt about it.
Stanleys shameless decision to go against one of their best fans instead of supporting one of their own and following the correct procedures.
It's the Jase situation all over again.
Don't trust the club to have your back, there more likely to throw a knife in it.
Last edited:
Interesting debate as I was once called a racist on this forum!!!.
In reality the bloke (who I know reasonably well) said something (which he admitted) and has been punished.
Those who know him,will admit he is sometimes a volatile person but defiantly not a rascist.
I know his "grievances ",which Cashy relates to,but he's done the best thing and kept his head below the parapet !!
This will all be forgotten in time,as the bloke is gutted at the outcome,but as I said he's definitely no rascist
In reality the bloke (who I know reasonably well) said something (which he admitted) and has been punished.
Those who know him,will admit he is sometimes a volatile person but defiantly not a rascist.
I know his "grievances ",which Cashy relates to,but he's done the best thing and kept his head below the parapet !!
This will all be forgotten in time,as the bloke is gutted at the outcome,but as I said he's definitely no rascist
I suppose my nonsense is why the ultras forum died a death?
Scraping the barrel now... how sad and bitter. Your ramblings are water off a duck's back to me but if you can't be man enough to apologise for your earlier posts then as I said previously, there's no hope.
I'm devastated.
We both know the score, and i know yeh aint given to telling untruths, I just hope those who shoulda done in the first instance now do the same.
'One of their best fans'??
Strange then that his own defence say he's not really that interested in the club & only goes so that his son can support the team - unless that's one of the things the paper has reported wrongly??
And even if he was the most ardent fan ever, what exactly were the club supposed to do once Newport County had reported the incident to the police?
They can't treat people differently according to how good a fan they are - & the Jason situation was totally different, he only got into trouble trying to help out another fan, not for shouting racial abuse.
Yer just demonstrating how little yeh know about what went on,
Newport reported it on the Sunday, The fan in question reported racist abuse to himself to 4 stewards on the day it happened, yet our wonderful club said they knew nothing about it, so therefore the investigation should have commenced on the Sat evening, When yeh actually know what yer talking about then what yer saying may be valid. But still you believe what yeh read in the press, it seems to suit your purpose,There is also the fact the LET reporter says he admitted shouting racist abuse in front of a stand packed with children, Total LIE, this happened 20mins after the game, all the Newport Fans had left, there was all the Newport players on the pitch n hardly a soul left on the ground. But still you keep believing crap,
Yer just demonstrating how little yeh know about what went on,
Perhaps the fan in question should instead have reported the abuse aimed at him to the police, supported by those who do know what they are talking about, so must have seen the events and therefore been able to bear credible witness? Or perhaps these witnesses might have spoken in his defence/mitigation in court, instead of using a website to slag off people whose purpose simply seems to be to say there is no place for racial abuse on football terraces?
Like Macca, I am also confused.
As I understand it, the investigation was handed over to the police and the police brought the prosecution. The case would have been heard in a court of law, not the pages of the LET. So what was or was not reported there is irrelevant.
It is suggested that some people have lied. Was this in court? If so, that would have been a very serious matter indeed. Did anyone tell the police what the "true story" actually was? If so, what was the response of the police? Did the police bring the prosecution despite knowing the "true story"? If that "true story" was not given to the police, why not?
If the person charged was himself racially abused, was that fact mentioned in court?
Who was there and witnessed the incident? Obviously Cashy, DAV007 and Lemur. Anyone else? Did the police interview them as witnesses?
I really would like the confusion to be cleared up, especially if there has been a miscarriage of justice.
As I understand it, the investigation was handed over to the police and the police brought the prosecution. The case would have been heard in a court of law, not the pages of the LET. So what was or was not reported there is irrelevant.
It is suggested that some people have lied. Was this in court? If so, that would have been a very serious matter indeed. Did anyone tell the police what the "true story" actually was? If so, what was the response of the police? Did the police bring the prosecution despite knowing the "true story"? If that "true story" was not given to the police, why not?
If the person charged was himself racially abused, was that fact mentioned in court?
Who was there and witnessed the incident? Obviously Cashy, DAV007 and Lemur. Anyone else? Did the police interview them as witnesses?
I really would like the confusion to be cleared up, especially if there has been a miscarriage of justice.
- Status