Rob heys

A very quick search on google and I found this.

http://www.sportsbettinggroup.org/docs/FA Betting Education Booklet.pdf

To be honest I would have thought all the rules are common sense: 'don't bet on your club', 'don't bet on competitions your club is involved in', 'don't get involved in match fixing'.....

If you really need to gamble, surely it isn't difficult to find something else to bet on. Anything else at all would do. Surely it's not worth your job??
 
Re: Re: Rob heys

Tom D said:
A very quick search on google and I found this.

http://www.sportsbettinggroup.org/docs/FA Betting Education Booklet.pdf

To be honest I would have thought all the rules are common sense: 'don't bet on your club', 'don't bet on competitions your club is involved in', 'don't get involved in match fixing'.....

If you really need to gamble, surely it isn't difficult to find something else to bet on. Anything else at all would do. Surely it's not worth your job??
Click to expand...

Sounds like a dumb cup bet or Acca
 
Shame, feel sorry for him its not just the Club its a person maybe losing their livelihood and one they enjoy I would think. :(

After what has happened in the past you would think this would never happen again especially from a CEO ? :(
 
Rochdale forum:-

"Can't help but feel this sort of thing is rife at Accy, first the whole cav thing, now this. Also we have seen first hand that coleman didn't mind his players gambling and to an extent encouraged it."

No doubt Dav007 can put them right on that?
 
DAV007 said:
That's a horrible thing to say.

I asked some legit questions as to why Rob Heys is untouchable in so many of this forum users eyes, and made a point about the previous betting scandal.
I also asked why they club where letting the other media outlets run with the story instead of putting out a response.

Nice to see they have put out a response.

And what a great way to prepare for a big cup match, but then again ,it will all be Ian Dunbavins fault, or John Colemans fault, or Sean McConvilles fault, etc.


Sorry for looking a little deeper.
Click to expand...

Sounds like DAV007 has got something right at long last!!!
 
Personally I think RH is ok but he does need to brush up on some things, that said I think we should reserve judgement on this case until all the facts have been established. There is no point in prejudging something that we don't know all the details about.

It could well be a simple error on his part or a failure to follow protocol, either way it could have a massive impact on his career, therefore I have nothing else to say on it as I don't think it is appropriate for us to cast judgement on this as we don't know all the facts.
 
He's admitted the charge but asked for a personal hearing and has withdrawn from all club duties until the regulatory committee delivers its findings according to the BBC website
 
maccawozzagod said:
I think it's important to point out that the wording on the Stanley website is that he has accepted the charge - not admitted it.
Click to expand...

Agreed - a careful choice of words. But the BBC now states "Cameron Jerome and Robert Heys admit betting offences". We all know that the BBC and accuracy do not sit happily together, but that is a dangerous thing to say if not correct.
 
maccawozzagod said:
I think it's important to point out that the wording on the Stanley website is that he has accepted the charge - not admitted it.
Click to expand...

Apart from the indication given on the BBC web, Macca, "accepted" in that context invariably means "admitted", rather than just "received". Were he just agreeing that he'd received the formal notification of the charges you can be sure the statement would have made that clear.

Now we wait for the hearing and the rest of the story; wild speculation, or "kangeroo court judgement" helps no-one
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top