Royal Anniversary

katex

katex

Resting in Peace
Overlooker
Sure you probably covered this topic last year. Nothing, nothing, ever will help me to take to this woman ... Camilla of course !!

As a woman, know how manipulative we can be, and honey, I can see right through you. The polls tell us that the public are warming to her, sorry, not me. Grrrr, every time I see or hear about her, want to bring out my sick bucket. \_________/ :sick:

As for Queen Camilla, would rather be thrown in the Tower of London than curtsy before her *****

Have I a problem ?
 
grannyclaret said:
no you havent... i totaly agree with you
Click to expand...

Thanks G-C, thought it might be just me, and you are such a lovely person that my instincts could be correct after all.
 
I think the media are trying TOO hard to brainwash us into liking her ..i think she was an evil conniving marriage wrecker....
 
grannyclaret said:
I think the media are trying TOO hard to brainwash us into liking her ..i think she was an evil conniving marriage wrecker....
Click to expand...

I don't think, I know !!
 
I like the monarchy ,and i think it should be part of our heritage,, but i realy have a problem with mrs windsor
 
I think that it is brilliant.

He loved and wanted her long before Diana but had to bow down to his mother's rules and pick a perfect girl to be the mother of his children. Not a marriage made in heaven, as we all know, but, he's so happy now and with his soulmate.

I, along with most folks, cried my heart out when Diana was killed, but time does move on and I wish them all the best on their anniversary.
 
Maybe they should get out of the C17 and into the C21. Could wee Willy Windsor be able to marry his squeeze now that she has been popped? The way it sits at the moment not likely.
 
well i say good luck to them both .....they DO look very happy & i must say look well to-gether , the marriage has been accepted by the children & thats good .
 
As long as both of them are contented with each other it does not matter what anyone else thinks.How many of us here would ignore the thoughts of others if it meant we could be happy. I know I would.
 
I think Camillia is lovely. She likes a smoke & I've no doubt she likes a drink as well. She is just the sort of person to prop up the bar with, unimaginable with her predecessor, that self-centered slut Diana.
 
junetta said:
I think that it is brilliant.

He loved and wanted her long before Diana but had to bow down to his mother's rules and pick a perfect girl to be the mother of his children.
Click to expand...

Well then he should have been a man and not so bloody wet, unlike his great Uncle the Duke of Windsor, and married the woman he loved back in the 70's.

The only trouble with that is that he would have had to give up his claim to succession, and a lot of the privileges he now enjoys.

That said they do look happy, but if she was unsuitable back in the seventies because she wasn't of high enough birth and not virginally pure, now that they are both divorced what makes her suitable as a future consort/Queen?

I bet Princess Margaret's spinning in her grave shouting 'how come they've changed the bloody rules for that little twerp.'
 
Gayle said:
Why would he have had to give up his claim to succession if he'd married her back then?
Click to expand...

...because she wasn't a virgin. Archaic I know, but hey that's Royalty for you.

Diana's uncle had to publicly state her pureness prior to her wedding in 1981.
 
Ironic then because it was probably Charles that stopped her from being a virgin in the first place.

As for Diana - how on earth would her uncle know something like that?
 
Also Camilla's family the Kepples were not really thought of as being of good stock. They weren't aristocratic, her great grandmother had been a Royal mistress to Edward VIII, and her great aunt was the lesbian Violet Trefussis who caused a scandal when she left her husband and ran off with Vita Sackville West.
 
Just shows how misguided people get when they stick to protocol or formalities. In the end Diana's family had its fair share of divorces and scandals so she might have been 'aristocracy' but the family was just as prone to trouble as any other.

I'm not really interested in the royals either way but I do think it's a shame that he wasn't allowed to marry the love of his life when he was younger. Having said that, the affair that carried on behind Diana's back was pretty dispicable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top