sick pay?

cashman said:
i cannot see any harm in the post at all:confused: nothing about the recognition of these people was posted, so whats the beef?:confused:maybe i'm stupid?
Click to expand...

Not stupid at all Cashy......Twelve months ago I went into a carry out in Darwen to treat my family to a curry supper....10 in all...I noticed one guy looking at me to which I responded 'Alright Pal' as a form of greeting...His response was 'Who the F are you calling pal. Luckily my two sons in law, who are both built like brick outhouses walked into the shop and matey backed off.
Why would I at my age or why should I at my age be threatened by these low life.? :confused:
 
cmonstanley said:
yep im fed up working and paying my taxes for scum like this.i feel strongly about this and so do other hard working families why should we pay for their life .benefits for people shoud be abolished and give them food vouchers.people who have contributed taxes by working should have a referendum to see if they agree their hard earned taxes go to these scum...
Click to expand...


The original post said he would have to go back to work, so he may be one of those who have paid tax that you are going to hold a referendum for ;)
 
lancsdave said:
The original post said he would have to go back to work, so he may be one of those who have paid tax that you are going to hold a referendum for ;)
Click to expand...

N' like go back to work, go back to work where....would you employ this divvy?...in the original post?
 
if he did work sometime hes took his taxes back by stretching recources ie police nhs making our lives a misery.all i say is kill junkie scum..our children need a decent future not put in jeopardy by these low life.they had a choce whether to take drugs im sick and tired of people making excuses for these scum..its time to get even on these scum,time for a bit of vigilantism..or there is no future for this country..:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
 
so you dont care about children these people are grown adults they took a choice and need to be put of their misery.....i dont give a pooh anymore anything that threatens chldrens future needs fixing.so you want total anarchy in a bankrupt country where rape and murder is the norm,because they want a quick fix .i dont think so....
 
cmonstanley said:
so you dont care about children these people are grown adults they took a choice and need to be put of their misery.....
Click to expand...

Yes I do care. I just happen to know that the issue isn't so black and white as you seem to think it is.

Would you advocate the killing of silly little twelve year olds smoking a spliff, which is of course an illegal drug?

Or a thirteen year old girl, tempted away from care by some sick git who quickly gets her hooked on crack or smack, before putting her on the game to pay for her habit?

Personally I'd much rather see vigilantes clearing the streets of dealers, especially the Mr. Bigs, most of whom never touch drugs, they just live off the profits.;)
 
garinda said:
Yes I do care. I just happen to know that the issue isn't so black and white as you seem to think it is.

Would you advocate the killing of silly little twelve year olds smoking a spliff, which is of course an illegal drug?

Or a thirteen year old girl, tempted away from care by some sick git who quickly gets her hooked on crack or smack, before putting her on the game to pay for her habit?

Personally I'd much rather see vigilantes clearing the streets of dealers, especially the Mr. Bigs, most of whom never touch drugs, they just live off the profits.;)
Click to expand...
thats the one! not the rubbish cmonstanley is saying, i lost 3 good mates early 70s to drugs 2 male 1 female, none were ever dealers, most kids started taking em from mid 60s, christ we thought it was cool, even the "Beatles" n other icons were saying so...... when yer young ya fall fer all that bull, i was lucky, me mates were not.
 
Last edited:
i think enough was said in first post to breach confidentiality rules, especially if someone knows where suzie works.

i wouldnt like to test the rules.
 
Thanks for the input.
I feel sure I'll learn something from the opinions about the situation given and be able to integrate those into my practice.
Helps me have a more open and rounded view.
 
is the fact that he said he would get a job and support the potential baby instead of claiming benefits not a good thing or have i missed something?
 
so your saying a couple that has 2 kids in care,its alright to have more kids for them to neglect.your so stupid if you think its hunky dory or these 2 to have kids..:confused::confused::confused:
 
From a professional point of view, there are no confidentiality rules being breached here. No names mentioned, just a typical, everyday scenario seen in GP, Antenatal, DWP, Social Service and Probation offices and surgeries throughout the country.

If I had a quid for everyone who'd said similar to me in my job, I'd have retired 6 years ago..:)
 
emamum said:
is the fact that he said he would get a job and support the potential baby instead of claiming benefits not a good thing or have i missed something?
Click to expand...


I think there are a couple of issues

1. Why only get a job now she is having a baby? It sounds like he prefers to not work - that might not be true of course.

2. If she has 2 kids in care already should she be allowed to have more? If we assume she is not fit to look after the other two - might not be the case here but is valid in other cases - why will she be fit to look after another?
 
I couldn't see any problem with Susie's original post, its an everyday occurance in todays world. We have a situation where there are people who can work but won't and those who want to work who can't. Its always baffled me how some people can spend their days in the pub and bookies, without lifting a finger to do any sort of work. Mind you I have to admit I have a big drink problem myself, I can't flaming well afford it:rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top