SmearGate

cashman said:
was on the news tonight that in 1992, the disgusted "Cameron" was part of a tory plot to stop Kinnock from being elected, using similar methods, seems it was ok then.:rolleyes: my point being they are all the same, but some numptys cannot see it.
Click to expand...

Did you a good turn then? :)
 
Smeargate?..some people really do push the limits..considering the undercover information gathering tactics some people on here have been involved with.. yep a petty dirt shovelling post.. but then I don't think it will be the last from the likes of Andrew and his crew!
 
Re: StarGate

Mancie said:
Smeargate?..some people really do push the limits..considering the undercover information gathering tactics some people on here have been involved with.. yep a petty dirt shovelling post.. but then I don't think it will be the last from the likes of Andrew and his crew!
Click to expand...
I actually think its a thread of interest Mancie, seeing its plastered over every news channel and every newspaper, mostly the broad sheets, not just a private little project by Andrew
 
Re: StarGate

He just can't find it in him to say sorry can he. He knew exactly what sort of person he hand picked to be a special adviser, whom worked in the same office as him. McBride worked as Brown's media advisor last year, he was found out to be briefing against one of the governments own ministers, lots of pressure was placed on Brown to ditch him, instead he put him in charge of strategy.
 
why should brown apologise? its the guys involved that apologies fall on, thatcher never apologised fer cameron n the tory boys.:rolleyes:
 
cashman said:
why should brown apologise? its the guys involved that apologies fall on, thatcher never apologised fer cameron n the tory boys.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

It was his hand picked special advisor and attack dog. He was hired to do this sort of thing. When it's somebody in his own office on the desk next to him, he should apologise. What goes out of that office, from offical downing street e-mail addresses, does so in the name of Gordon Brown. When you have a team you have to take responsibility for it. The story would have lost its legs yesterday if he'd have just said sorry. It's the hardest word for him though.
 
andrewb said:
It was his hand picked special advisor and attack dog. He was hired to do this sort of thing. When it's somebody in his own office on the desk next to him, he should apologise. What goes out of that office, from offical downing street e-mail addresses, does so in the name of Gordon Brown. When you have a team you have to take responsibility for it. The story would have lost its legs yesterday if he'd have just said sorry. It's the hardest word for him though.
Click to expand...
I guess we should be questioning Browns judgement in terms of his hand-picked advisor but it doesnt surprise me in the least. Whats new:)
 
Last edited:
I don't see the fuss with this story. There are hundreds of little maggots working for all parties cultivating defamatory stories. To think there's just this one person working for one party would be idiotic.
 
shakermaker said:
I don't see the fuss with this story. There are hundreds of little maggots working for all parties cultivating defamatory stories. To think there's just this one person working for one party would be idiotic.
Click to expand...
i know it shaker,you know it, even andrew knows it, but he just can't resist.:rolleyes: i'm thinking of taking bets, that the next time the chimney at the "Vatican" smokes Andrew has been elected "Pope":D
 
Re: StarGate

cashman said:
i know it shaker,you know it, even andrew knows it, but he just can't resist.:rolleyes: I'm thinking of taking bets, that the next time the chimney at the "Vatican" smokes Andrew has been elected "Pope":D
Click to expand...
Na cashy he must be at the back of the queue or at least behind a bloke called Greg:D
 
To me, the power of political debate has to be arguing the point raised without personally attacking the person raising them.

Cashy, out of all your posts on this, you have double the amount attacking andrew, rather than sticking to topic.

From a man who usually can give valid arguments without resorting to this kind of thing, I've got to admit to being pretty disappointed
 
onlyme said:
To me, the power of political debate has to be arguing the point raised without personally attacking the person raising them.

Cashy, out of all your posts on this, you have double the amount attacking andrew, rather than sticking to topic.

From a man who usually can give valid arguments without resorting to this kind of thing, I've got to admit to being pretty disappointed
Click to expand...
sorry yer feeling disappointed, are ya feeling ignored? not to worry,i can attack you if it makes ya feel better.:tongueout
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top