Ah go on we get three a week like you, then you hang on watching the thread, (just in case), prove to be different, you said goodbye, mean it.
(top right hand corner just click on Log Out).
Spire farm development
- Thread starter RHFOY
- Start date
-
- Tags
- heritage and history
Ah go on we get three a week like you, then you hang on watching the thread, (just in case), prove to be different, you said goodbye, mean it.
(top right hand corner just click on Log Out).
i embrace your points and i have invited many of the webbers to call in and have a cup of tea, plus you can have alook round if you wish, i am aware that there are other threads to share but my main points are about spire farm its history, if you go to my very first post on page one you will see were it as led from people interested in my historic home to the critics.rob p.s. for you only i will log out(for now)
Last edited by a moderator:
hahaha ive come back on to see your reply,got to go now as im chuckling to much at your responseLiar, Liar, Pants on fire!
You are still logged on!
Well it should be allowed.
By law dogs have to be kept under control by the owner.
So if a dog is bothering your animals it is not under control.
Maybe you should be allowed to shoot the dog owner instead
i think i have answered most peoples concerns, i now think most of the threads are wind up ones about grammer or what can we print now to annoy him, all thats left for me to do now is have an open day at my home. this will prove who really wants their concerns answered and have a tour of the great place, this is my last pledge to the concerned and we couldnt be any more fairer than that.
so if folk are interested in this we could do it sunday 28 nov or sunday 5 dec, i await...
He doesnt even live at the spire anymore he only has some staff there for the stables.So its not really a family home is it! Also how can you "bar" someone from a right of way, this statement gives in insight into what his true agenda is, which is to try and stop people walking or riding (horses,mountain bikes etc) through what he sees as his estate.The footpath where it was sited was hidden from view of the house by a laurel hedge so what was the problem with that? As for the wall it was knocked down by excavators on his land so were they not in his employ?The stream that leads nowhere is an interesting one where does Mr Foy think it goes after that ,is there some kind of cavernous underground lake beneath Accrington that nobody KNOWS about? Having said all that improvement of any area or house must be applauded when gone about the right way he still has time to redeem all and prove some of us wrong ! But i am not holding my breath!
Well it should be allowed.
By law dogs have to be kept under control by the owner.
So if a dog is bothering your animals it is not under control.
Maybe you should be allowed to shoot the dog owner instead
What about when animals bother you/your dogs?
Should you be allowed to shoot/harm them?
What about when animals bother you/your dogs?
Should you be allowed to shoot/harm them?
Yes as long as your dog is under control at the time otherwise it should be your dog shot and the owner as well
you stupid man, your allegations are both absurd and border on brain dead, you are a ? and a coward, if you doubt anything ive said come and meet me, then you can rewrite your threads with an apology, you are forever the doubter and a scaremonger who scribbles ****e down with no substance to your claims, for some reason you dont want to chat face to face, so its best that i ignore your idle claims and CONCENTRATE on those who have a vested interest in listening, you have lowered the bar, and you continue to abuse my grounds and you WILL BE THE FIRST TO HAVE AN INJUNCTION PLACED ON THEM, WHILST THE OTHER 99& CONTINUE to enjoy THE AMBIENCE OF OUR HOME, and even a drink on the way past, you bitter very bitter man, how sad!!!!!He doesnt even live at the spire anymore he only has some staff there for the stables.So its not really a family home is it! Also how can you "bar" someone from a right of way, this statement gives in insight into what his true agenda is, which is to try and stop people walking or riding (horses,mountain bikes etc) through what he sees as his estate.The footpath where it was sited was hidden from view of the house by a laurel hedge so what was the problem with that? As for the wall it was knocked down by excavators on his land so were they not in his employ?The stream that leads nowhere is an interesting one where does Mr Foy think it goes after that ,is there some kind of cavernous underground lake beneath Accrington that nobody KNOWS about? Having said all that improvement of any area or house must be applauded when gone about the right way he still has time to redeem all and prove some of us wrong ! But i am not holding my breath!
Last edited:
He doesnt even live at the spire anymore he only has some staff there for the stables.So its not really a family home is it! Also how can you "bar" someone from a right of way, this statement gives in insight into what his true agenda is, which is to try and stop people walking or riding (horses,mountain bikes etc) through what he sees as his estate.The footpath where it was sited was hidden from view of the house by a laurel hedge so what was the problem with that? As for the wall it was knocked down by excavators on his land so were they not in his employ?The stream that leads nowhere is an interesting one where does Mr Foy think it goes after that ,is there some kind of cavernous underground lake beneath Accrington that nobody KNOWS about? Having said all that improvement of any area or house must be applauded when gone about the right way he still has time to redeem all and prove some of us wrong ! But i am not holding my breath!
well walkinman, have no idea who is right or who is wrong, but to my mind the opportunity is yon, go talk to the guy! in other words "Put Up or Shut Up"
As you said cashman you dont know who is right but i do, so to meet Mr Foy is a waste of time and effort. Also for his information i have never abused his or anybodys grounds. Mr Foy is entitled to his opinion as i am to mine but i would not be so presumptuous to call him stupid and bitter for having said opinions as you said in an earlier post cashman "folk aint blind".
And by the way how come he gets away with capitals and i didnt?
so ya say, but people reading this thread in the main have no idea who's right, just the posts of 2 who disagree, fact, so i must assume as the guy who's offered to talk to ya, is cos you refuse to talk to him, simple common sense.
True, well we will agree to disagree on this!
But he still got away with the shouting thing
But he still got away with the shouting thing
But he still got away with the shouting thing
What shouting thing? Please explain.
In one post I said block capitals are the internet way of shouting - which it is.
Well I know who I'd believe and it isn't Mr Foy!
Why? give n example then?Well I know who I'd believe and it isn't Mr Foy!
