It would have to be a deduction of ten points to put the Wombles in danger. Seem to recall Stanley faced this problem during the reign of Professor Coleman, but can't recall the outcome, assuming I'm remembering correctly?
How do yeh get that conclusion if it was 9pts Di?I read that the lad had played in two games after the Cheltenham one so IF the FA are consistent it would be a nine point deduction - probably not enough to put them in direct danger but maybe enough to make them a tad nervous
Sure they got 56 pts?? so 9 off that would be direct danger?? unless i'm missing summat?
hey DAV007 I've never commented yet unless i have in my sleepIanray reckons we are safe.
If it's good enough for ian, its good enough for me
Hes got a vivid imagination, its were he comes from. He also tried to vote fer yeh in player of the season.hey DAV007 I've never commented yet unless i have in my sleep
Sorry if I confused you Cashy, wasn't sure how many points the wombles had amassed & like someone else has said if they do get a points deduction it might just be how many they gained in the three games the lad played in - we'll just have to wait & see, think their hearing is on 28th AprilHow do yeh get that conclusion if it was 9pts Di?Sure they got 56 pts?? so 9 off that would be direct danger?? unless i'm missing summat?
![]()
hey DAV007 I've never commented yet unless i have in my sleep
Ray,
When are you and chubbyman going to make it up?
Why don't you book a table for 2 at the crown and talk it over?





LET'S GET 3 POINTS TO FINISH WITH NEXT WEEK AND HAVE A PARTY!!!

. Congrats to JB and all the boys.



We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.