Team vs Burton

Nickelson

Nickelson

Nori Brick
Tackler
With us not being able to move off 5th place, whats the team going to be vs Burton ?

Personally I would like Cisak to play to stay sharp. Rest the likes of Gornell, Mcconville, Ryan ect.

Play Turner, Boulding, Murphy, Putterill, Lindfield.


Also do we keep Long until after the play off final ?
 
agree nickelson, think it would be good to play some of the squad, n rest certain players, yeh never know yer luck in a raffle n if anyone gets injured, match practice could be vital, not sure about Long, hope he can stay fer play offs, a good young lad,IMHO.
 
Id rest a few.... BUT momentum is very important.

Maybe the give the first XI the first 45 mins, then take off Ryan, Jacobsen and 1 other at HT.

Very difficult decision for Coley to make....... Rather nice to have that kind of problem I suspect :)
 
whilst i agree smudge about momentum, i honestly can't see any sign that any of these lads would need revving up, all have been magnificent IMHO.:)
 
Rather nice problem to have though aint it.

Personally id rest Ryan, Jacobsen, Gornell, Hessey and maybe Mcconville.

Play.... Razor, Boulding, Leam, Long and Turner

Not bad replacements !! :)
 
I'd make every change possible, i maybe agree with Cisak playing but every other one of should have their feet up now for a few days.
 
Think it's a great idea & gives other team players a chance to play 1st team match, giving them a chance to shine and prove their worth for selection on bench for playoff chances. Even tho Liam came on for a few minutes he valued that time & chance to play, I know certainly players mentioned do play well in reserves & giving these lads a chance without losing place in league will give coley options to test out players for any strong selection he should make & cover subs wise, definitely keep cissak on tho!
 
I'd keep the back 4 as they are less likely to pick up injuries, rest Gornell, Proccy and Jimmy play.

Winnard Hessey/Long Edwards Jacobson
Joyce Barnett
Razor Sean Leam
Linfield
 
I'm tempted to suggest a change of formation as well as change of personnel. Does this seem like an attacking 4-3-3 option?

Dunbavin

Murphy Long Owens Richardson

Turner Craney Putterell

Parkinson Boulding Lindfield
 
Agree it would be wise to have a look at some of the other players but I would imagine when you are part of a team in a position like that you want to play every game anyway.

Also of more note some of these lads will I would imagine be looking at their futures.
 
Dont think there will be major changes as they dont want to lose that momentum that smudge mentioned.
They may rest the older players who are carrying knocks ie Hessey and Craney(replaced with Barnett and Long).
Young players wont want to be going two weeks without a game,and there will be plenty to work on after saturdays game.
 
Just out of interest, how many games does a player have to have played in to qualify for a medal if the team gets through the play offs and wins promotion?

Quite a few players seem to have been on the bench every week but rarely get on. There is also forgotten man Jon Bateson, he played the first 12 league games. He's back at Stanley but can't play against Burton due to a knee ligament injury picked up playing for Altrincham against Fleetwood recently.
 
it used to be 14 in the top divisions but no idea anymore in the bargain basement league. But as an aside I am sure that subs do get counted even if they don't come on. I remember Bobby Mimms got one for Rovers when they bought the title in 95, even though he never played a game
 
Greeny said:
Also , how many changes can JC make without getting done by the FA
Click to expand...


From what I can gather there isn't a specific number, it's in the opinion of the FA or Football League. I don't think the Football League bother about it as much as the FA. Especially as this one has no bearing on any promotion or relegation issues for any club. It's not uncommon for clubs with nothing to play for to play fringe players or kids from the youth teams to see if they are good enough for future plans.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top