Testing the limits.

Eric we all know what he is, unfortunately like a spoilt child he is 'Testing To The Limits'.

I've missed your input Less,I did wonder how long it would be before you conjured up the strength to post :rolleyes:.

Perhaps you could share your views on this topic?
 
Re: Re: Testing the limits.

I've missed your input Less,I did wonder how long it would be before you conjured up the strength to post :rolleyes:.

Perhaps you could share your views on this topic?
Perhaps I could, but it's obvious you wouldn't understand me any more than any other plain speaking person, whilst you are ruining Erics thread where is the point of anyone else putting forward sense you obviously can't comprehend?
 
I knew I should of stuck to my guns and not posted again in this thread,fair play I'll keep quite from now on.

Please enlighten us with your opinion on this topic rather than trying to antagonise me so you can report me ;)
 
Re: Re: Testing the limits.

I knew I should of stuck to my guns and not posted again in this thread,fair play I'll keep quite from now on.

Please enlighten us with your opinion on this topic rather than trying to antagonise me so you can report me ;)
You have had sensible additions to this thread, that I agree with, all of them from people that know far more than you, I would only be repeating what they have said, unlike you, I won't just keep repeating the tune I'm dancing to today.
 
I knew I should of stuck to my guns and not posted again in this thread,fair play I'll keep quite from now on.

I know how difficult that concept is...staying out of a thread.
But it would have been better that you did rather than posting such conspiracy links.
When something of this nature happens there are (and always will be) those who want to pursue conspiracy theories......and while you may not agree with how the Canadian government run the show, you are really in no position to alter anything.......also, until any one of us is in the position of being faced with an act of violence, none of us really know how we would respond....so,it does not behove you to poke fun of the Canadian cabinet.
As for the antagonism between Less and yourself, well, the power is in your hands.
Make sensible posts and do not rise to the bait.
 
Re: Re: Testing the limits.

I
As for the antagonism between Less and yourself, well, the power is in your hands.
Make sensible posts and do not rise to the bait.
Antagonism? I don't feel any antagonism towards the simple soul, however you are quite correct the power is in his hands, he posts like a complete banker.
 
I know how difficult that concept is...staying out of a thread.
But it would have been better that you did rather than posting such conspiracy links.
When something of this nature happens there are (and always will be) those who want to pursue conspiracy theories......and while you may not agree with how the Canadian government run the show, you are really in no position to alter anything.......also, until any one of us is in the position of being faced with an act of violence, none of us really know how we would respond....so,it does not behove you to poke fun of the Canadian cabinet.
As for the antagonism between Less and yourself, well, the power is in your hands.
Make sensible posts and do not rise to the bait.

I like a good conspiracy theory though M,from putting men on the moon to 9/11.Folk will draw their own conclusions from my (conspiracy) links.......

....thanks for the advice, I shoulda listened sooner :)
 
Antagonism? I don't feel any antagonism towards the simple soul, however you are quite correct the power is in his hands, he posts like a complete banker.

Be careful Less, your comments could been seen as "personal attacks" and 'you' know what happens when you make them ;)

I take it your not in the mood for sharing your thoughts on this topic just after stirring the pot?
 
Be careful Less, your comments could been seen as "personal attacks" and 'you' know what happens when you make them ;)

I take it your not in the mood for sharing your thoughts on this topic just after stirring the pot?

See! You still aren't listening. Them flaps of skin on the side of your head are not just to keep your cap from falling over your eyes you know.
 
And would you not have done the same?
We can all be brave when untested(and unlikely to be).
There is being a fool and being a dead fool...and I know which I would choose.

OK Margaret, strike out the bit about the Prime Minister and read it again please.

"during Wednesday's attack MPs sharpened flagpoles to use as spears against the gunman."
 
Last edited:
OK Margaret, strike out the bit about the Prime Minister and read it again please.

Why? Will it make more sense if I do that?
If I strike out the bit about the Prime Minister all it leaves is the bit in italics which you put in yourself...... A bit of nonsense about what was, a serious event.....and for those involved, fraught with danger.
Maybe it is my funny bone I need to have sharpened?
 
Why? Will it make more sense if I do that?
If I strike out the bit about the Prime Minister all it leaves is the bit in italics which you put in yourself...... A bit of nonsense about what was, a serious event.....and for those involved, fraught with danger.
Maybe it is my funny bone I need to have sharpened?

Yes
I didn't put the bit about spears in I only italicised it.
You are grasping the wrong end of the stick/flagpole/spear.

I was complimenting the cannucks.
 
Re: Re: Testing the limits.

Be careful Less, your comments could been seen as "personal attacks" and 'you' know what happens when you make them ;)

I take it your not in the mood for sharing your thoughts on this topic just after stirring the pot?
You seem hurt?
Someone reported you?
You got a slap on the wrist because you were out of order?
You feel bitter?
How is that whoever reported you's fault?
Learn, most of us get reported, some banned, learn from it and please improve.
 
Yes
I didn't put the bit about spears in I only italicised it.
You are grasping the wrong end of the stick/flagpole/spear.

I was complimenting the cannucks.
Ah, well now that makes sense.....now I know that you only italicised the words.
Thank you for your explanation...it is appreciated.
I was looking for something much deeper.....and missing it completely. Sometimes I need a light(but not for a fag).
 
Ah, well now that makes sense.....now I know that you only italicised the words.
Thank you for your explanation...it is appreciated.
I was looking for something much deeper.....and missing it completely. Sometimes I need a light(but not for a fag).

I'm not gonna italicise as I paraphrase James Cudmore's intelligent article in yesterday's Telegraph Margaret.
.

In Cold Lake Alberta home base to the CF-18 Hornets that flew out to help the campaign against ISIL the local mosque was graffitied with "Go Home" and "Canada" sprayed in red paint.
BUT
In a few hours this red paint was gone, neighbours scrubbed the walls clean and hung signs in nearby windows proclaiming "You are home" and "Love thy neighbour"

"A great response to the backwash from a lone wolf religious crack addict" says I


* Cudmore is a senior reporter for CNBC
 
Last edited:
And isn't that how it should be?

When I quoted the facts that we knew about this incident, nowhere did I say or imply that this was part of a terrorist plot......in fact I think that in one post I said the we did not know the motives or the metal state of the perpetrator of this act of violence.
See post 47.
 
Back
Top