Do specsavers do glasses to combat alcoholic haze then DaveMancie, Mancie, if you look you'll see ..... really you will !" My comment was in reply to C'mon's over exaggerated post #13 & if you look further at post #8 which I myself entered, I'm against the Harrier cuts, as they are far more versatile in my opinion than the Tornadoes, but something had to give. You really need to get down to Specsavers & have your Lenses changed or at least cleaned.
You say you are against the cuts.. but "something has to give".. who told you that this country needs to make massive cuts in defence... was it Jaysay or the daily mail?Mancie, Mancie, if you look you'll see ..... really you will !" My comment was in reply to C'mon's over exaggerated post #13 & if you look further at post #8 which I myself entered, I'm against the Harrier cuts, as they are far more versatile in my opinion than the Tornadoes, but something had to give. You really need to get down to Specsavers & have your Lenses changed or at least cleaned.
I required neither thank you very much Mancie. Being someone who is capable of gleaning relevant information eclectically & not purely Party Pish, or the scrawlings of one publication, I think I can gain a better & balanced over view.
Unlike some who tend to get stuck in a rut of blind belief in whatever their "leaders" or "Chosen Rag" tend to espouse.
They don't want to hear that Dave
And who are "they" that don't want to hear stuff?.. do you mean those who do not agree with the massive cuts in the defence of this country?.They don't want to hear that Dave
No people like you don't want to know that it was Labours idea