This could be important!

[accymel]

Your probably right Mel, but on the other hand I can understand Less's un-ease at someone using accyweb to blatantly stir up trouble.

If that is the case & i do beleive IMHO that it is then its a good reason to ban or moderate this members activity, as has been done before for the interest of accyweb. MHO is that the said member has no fact to his claims & therefore cannot substantiate them - even if he could then the interest of accyweb should be paramount & not for this sole persons intentions which i dont personally beleive are honourable, if said member has possesion of fact to his claims then its best not to have it on the local forum portal to expose it for legal implications.

Seems to me that this member has changed the protocol of this forum un neccessarily, which to my point of view is to the sole members favour - not to accywebs - just look at the pandamonum he has caused just by putting the standard text sig, seems that this member has now delighted in making his point without having to ermmm do so except a load of hot air.

 

[Tinkerbelle]

LOL! Or the mods could arrange a special little text sig for Mr Gondola saying "Approach with extreme caution"

 

[accymel]

LOL! Or the mods could arrange a special little text sig for Mr Gondola saying "Approach with extreme caution"

now thats a good one i'suppose you could blind him from 2nd life - maybe thats where his claims are from

 

[grannyclaret]

will this do?

 

[entwisi]

And if that were what he had done then I would equally defend it but he hasn't actually revealed anything.

In which case there is no need for a disclaimer...................

Either he reveals something or he doesn't. If he does its either truthful or not, the former should be public, the latter can be removed at request(and I would beg to add proof it is not true) by the mods.

 

[Neil]

In the run up to the local elections we the voting public have a right to know what the people we are expecting to represent us are up to. If it takes a posting on a web forum to do that then I'm all for it and I doubt anyone in their right mind would disagree after all what is there that is hidden that we shouldn't know about?

I think I am right in saying that if he is a Council employee then he is bound by certain rules and should be keeping his gob shut.

And if that were what he had done then I would equally defend it but he hasn't actually revealed anything.

That might be because of what i put above

 

[Less]

I asked people to put the disclaimer on only as temporary measure, Mick has now put an updated disclaimer on that should cover the site.

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/showthread.php?t=29681

So our signatures can go back to normal thanks.


In fact if they like the mods can now close this thread as it is no longer needed and we can perhaps get back to normal.

 

[entwisi]

I think I am right in saying that if he is a Council employee then he is bound by certain rules and should be keeping his gob shut.

But we don't know that he is. So much for open and honest goverment then!

 

[AccyJay]

Could the moderators not just automatically incoporate the disclaimer statement text into everybody's signature?

 

[panther]

I wondered why everyone had the same signature

 

[entwisi]

There is no need, you can all remove them. there never actually was a need but Mick has now put a disclaimer on accyweb anyway

 

[garinda]

There is no need, you can all remove them. there never actually was a need but Mick has now put a disclaimer on accyweb anyway

We like them.

They are all the rage.

 

[entwisi]

what was that about sheep???

 

[garinda]

what was that about sheep???

I don't know, but when you've finished with it, and taken your wellies off, we'll ask it.