Transfer embargo

Can't see what the problem is myself. The football league have given dispensation to Portsmouth to allow them to make their squad up to the minimum of 20. Would have thought all football league clubs would be treated the same. Seems a bit pointless having rules :rolleyes:
 
lancsdave said:
Can't see what the problem is myself. The football league have given dispensation to Portsmouth to allow them to make their squad up to the minimum of 20. Would have thought all football league clubs would be treated the same. Seems a bit pointless having rules :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

you would hope they would apply the same dispensation to stanley.
 
Stanley in urgent hunt for a striker (From Lancashire Telegraph)

"Stanley, who have taken former Tranmere midfielder Charlie Barnett on trial and travel to AFC Fylde for a friendly tonight, have received confirmation from the Football League that their annual accounts have now been received. The Football League want clarification on a couple of issues but the club hope their transfer embargo will be lifted imminently and are keen to start signing players from Monday.

The Reds are likely to start the season without a stadium sponsor after negotiations over a possible deal fell through – with the club unhappy with the money being offered."

It's never straightforward, is it? :rolleyes:
 
Whalley Red said:
Stanley in urgent hunt for a striker (From Lancashire Telegraph)

"Stanley, who have taken former Tranmere midfielder Charlie Barnett on trial and travel to AFC Fylde for a friendly tonight, have received confirmation from the Football League that their annual accounts have now been received. The Football League want clarification on a couple of issues but the club hope their transfer embargo will be lifted imminently and are keen to start signing players from Monday.

The Reds are likely to start the season without a stadium sponsor after negotiations over a possible deal fell through – with the club unhappy with the money being offered."

It's never straightforward, is it? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
It wouldn't be Stanley if it was - what would we fans do without a bit of drama :rolleyes:
 
Whalley Red said:
The Reds are likely to start the season without a stadium sponsor after negotiations over a possible deal fell through – with the club unhappy with the money being offered."
Click to expand...

Any money offered will be more than we got last season and more than we are going to get this season. I wonder how much the Club are looking for to sponsor the ground.
 
JEFF said:
Any money offered will be more than we got last season and more than we are going to get this season. I wonder how much the Club are looking for to sponsor the ground.
Click to expand...
Does seem rather dumb to me.:rolleyes: probably want enough to pay whalley off.:rolleyes:
 
Given the management's prior record in downplaying major problems, I think we can only be highly suspicious of this comment.
 
Tealeaf said:
Given the management's prior record in downplaying major problems, I think we can only be highly suspicious of this comment.
Click to expand...

I thought we were highly suspicious of every comment?

Hope they might be related to paying off the cardboard millionaire and at least ending one saga.

Thank goodness that this is such an honest and tranparent club that our questions will be answered soon. :rolleyes:
 
Footy Nut said:
Have we one or two embargoes?
I ask because Southend have an embargo for owing the PFA monies and I couldn't remember if we still had any outstanding loans with them.
My memory isn't as good as it was?
Click to expand...
My memory really isn't good- I'd forgotten I'd posted this........
 
Frustrated with the contempt shown towards fans who have stumped up hard earned cash to help their club, I emailed the FL for reliable information:

Hi Alan

Unfortunately, we are not able to comment on any specific club that may or may not be subject to a registrations embargo. The Football League has a long-standing policy not to comment publicly about the imposition of embargoes, which is maintained to protect the interests of the clubs involved.
Player registration embargoes are imposed on clubs in instances where they have breached certain Football League regulations, policies or other requirements as determined by The League Board. The registration embargo will be maintained until the club rectifies the situation to the satisfaction of The League.
Given that we are unable to discuss the specifics of any particular case, we are sorry but we cannot comment further.

Kind Regards

Amanda

Amanda Craig
Customer Services Administrator
The Football League Limited

guess that's a 'no' then !
 
have told her about the sleepless nights Tealeaf - but not hopefull - probably Stanley have had their fair share of dispensations
 
LongLostSon said:
Frustrated with the contempt shown towards fans who have stumped up hard earned cash to help their club, I emailed the FL for reliable information:

Hi Alan

Unfortunately, we are not able to comment on any specific club that may or may not be subject to a registrations embargo. The Football League has a long-standing policy not to comment publicly about the imposition of embargoes, which is maintained to protect the interests of the clubs involved.
Player registration embargoes are imposed on clubs in instances where they have breached certain Football League regulations, policies or other requirements as determined by The League Board. The registration embargo will be maintained until the club rectifies the situation to the satisfaction of The League.
Given that we are unable to discuss the specifics of any particular case, we are sorry but we cannot comment further.

Kind Regards

Amanda

Amanda Craig
Customer Services Administrator
The Football League Limited

guess that's a 'no' then !
Click to expand...
At least you gave it a go - if you don't ask you don't get :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top