Trees???

I said "seem to think", my impression not a statement of fact and perhaps you would point out how I was getting personal? I was replying in the main to actual statements made by you (meaning you generically not individually) and I believe I have the right to make myself clear.
I am really not that disagreeable. I think that perhaps we should draw a line under all this and start again. Circular arguments aren't really my thing and I'm pretty sure that there are a lot of things we agree on. I think my posts on other threads show that. This is, of course, not to say I will never argue again.
Suffice to say that nothiing I have said was meant to be personal in a derogatory way but if anyone has taken it to be so please accept my apologies.
As I said. Quick with thi Gob, talks all day and says nowt.
 
All this over a few sodding trees:rolleyes:

Ah yes, but from little Acorns mighty Oaks do grow.

We might just be able to branch out and really develop a worthwhile thread.

Methinks the guy's bark is worse than his bite.

Have you twigged yet? let's leaf this thread alone.

Surely even this post was worth logging on for?

We, the members should be rooting for a greater contribution from our sapling members.

O.K. I give up my head hurts, someone elses turn.
:)
 
Let's not beat about the bush, it's plane to see and elm-entary that out of the ash of this trunk-ated thread wood arise a new and more poplar forum for those who are sycamore ranting.
 
Let's not beat about the bush, it's plane to see and elm-entary that out of the ash of this trunk-ated thread wood arise a new and more poplar forum for those who are sycamore ranting.
Your just larching about susie:rolleyes:
 
I won't pine when this thread ends.
...but yew never can tell when that will be
..it could prove poplar
 
Last edited:
Wood you Adam & Eve it ? Budding from his planting a question, the thread has blossomed in to something horticultural & rather high bough at times. I cedar way this is branching out so we don't need to get back to the roots & if we stick with this vine, who knows ? I think we'd be barking to stop now, so just shrub your shoulders & willownly know as we carry on if this will be an evergreen or knot. :)



Some deciduously dubious ones there, but hey, no need to keep it privet or beat around the bush,after all ,we're only larching about. :D
 
Well I'm totally stumped at the moment..but I do beleaf this thread needs to be spruced up.
 
Why all the hassle recently against new members? I just don't get it...can't see the wood for the trees perhaps...:confused:
 
calf hey res in june ....:D:D:D
 

Attachments

  • calf hey res with kevin 017.JPG
    calf hey res with kevin 017.JPG
    171 KB · Views: 8
  • calf hey res with kevin 018.JPG
    calf hey res with kevin 018.JPG
    155.3 KB · Views: 9
  • calf hey res with kevin 158.JPG
    calf hey res with kevin 158.JPG
    272.1 KB · Views: 8
  • calf hey res with kevin 008.JPG
    calf hey res with kevin 008.JPG
    117.6 KB · Views: 7
  • calf hey res with kevin 116.JPG
    calf hey res with kevin 116.JPG
    146.9 KB · Views: 9
  • calf hey res with kevin 023.JPG
    calf hey res with kevin 023.JPG
    107.9 KB · Views: 7
I recently took the dog for a walk along the old railway lines in Baxenden and, for the first time in a long time, I walked up through the large meadow (commonly known by the Hollins schoolkids as "Killer Hill") next to the football pitches. I was met with the sight of hundreds of plastic things hiding young trees. Now I love trees as much as anybody (probably more than most) but I think some places are better without them. This particular meadow has sweeping views and plenty of space for dogs to run free, not to mention a safe place for women alone to walk the dog. I was frankly sickened by the sight of it.
Does anyone know who is responsible for this act of environmental vandalism? When grown the views will be gone and the whole area will be enclosed and potentially unsafe.
Answers please.
I have just read through the posts in this thread and noted that no answer has yet been given to Houseboy's original question. I have therefore e-mailed the Baxenden councillors to see if they can shed any light on this tree-planting scheme. Seems like this might be a sensible place to start.
 
Thanks to all for your contributions on this thread, good, bad and genuinely funny. Thank you also, Less, for (I think) accepting my olive branch. Still a bit baffled as to why some people think that an offer of "peace" is somehow being "gobby" and "saying nowt" but I suppose you can't please all the people all the time.
Anyway, onwards and upwards.
 
Further to my post of 21st August I have received the following information from the Baxenden Councillors:-
"The trees were planted by Lancashire County Council as part of the tree campaign that has been running through Lancashire. There have been several complaints about the number of trees, but LCC are not prepared to do anything; they say that not all of the trees will take and that is why so many have been planted."
Hope this is helpful!
 
Further to my post of 21st August I have received the following information from the Baxenden Councillors:-
"The trees were planted by Lancashire County Council as part of the tree campaign that has been running through Lancashire. There have been several complaints about the number of trees, but LCC are not prepared to do anything; they say that not all of the trees will take and that is why so many have been planted."
Hope this is helpful!
Thanks very much for this Judith. It took a while to get here but I got the answer I wanted at last. Many thanks again.
 
Thanks very much for this Judith. It took a while to get here but I got the answer I wanted at last. Many thanks again.

spent the time to read from begining to end, even followed the links and read them.

houseboy asked a question, got flamed off "the usual suspects", surprised,that as a newbie he wasnt put off the site, everyone joined in with the levity, and the answer was found in the end. but usual suspects managed to flex their muscles and put newbie in his place. Also the amount of rules that were "broken", when you actually compare a post to the rules themselves

newbie baiting, of the highest order, and in "my opinion" houseboy well done for not taking the bait completely, and showing a little "decorum" for want of a better word.

if you actually, read it from beginning to end, if the usual suspects, would have just left alone, ignored the thread if they had no answers, within a few posts a new member, and for anything to survive it needs new members, would have had his answer, and thought "what a nice bunch of people", instead he is now possibly thinking "sites ok, but not very welcoming"

we are accrington web, lancashire folk, we are supposed to be friendly and welcoming, its what we are known for and proud of.
i havent seen it anywhere thats says "Welcome to Lanacashire, a place where everyone natters ( then in small print, but only if we dont think your moaning, and we wont get to know you first before we try to unleash our humour on you, and our first impressions of you will be used against you forever)

As for the trees i agree with AW, i much prefer the fells!, but thats not what you asked, but you already have your answer

thats my rant, its not the opener for a discussion, argument, a verbal challenge, i haven't named anyone other than Houseboy, i don't see the point of "answering" to this, although no doubting some will, i won't, this is the last post in this thread i shall make, and therefore accuse me of what you will.

darren
 
Back
Top