Ukip

ha ha your years out of date :D the more i read about ukip and their policies it scares the poo out of me:eek:

Not a UKIP policy. It's one loose cannon prospective councillor standing for a backwater council. And unlike you, I am not blinkered. I am quite able to say that this guy is an idiot, he should be tarred and feathered and railroaded out of politics completely. Apparently he has already been suspended from UKIP.

When Labour or Tory party members do stuff like this, the political mandarins wring their hands for a few weeks whilst spin doctors do their work and promote them to the house of lords. And people like you usually go to ground until it all blows over without one word of condemnation.

Care to comment on Diane Abbot, Margaret Moran, Tony Blair etc..etc..etc..??
 
Not a UKIP policy. It's one loose cannon prospective councillor standing for a backwater council. And unlike you, I am not blinkered. I am quite able to say that this guy is an idiot, he should be tarred and feathered and railroaded out of politics completely. Apparently he has already been suspended from UKIP.

When Labour or Tory party members do stuff like this, the political mandarins wring their hands for a few weeks whilst spin doctors do their work and promote them to the house of lords. And people like you usually go to ground until it all blows over without one word of condemnation.

Care to comment on Diane Abbot, Margaret Moran, Tony Blair etc..etc..etc..??
so why is he allowed to stand under the ukip banner:confused: i dont remember anybody from labour supporting hitler ideology
 
different times, but if you go into oswalds blackshirts policies,they were anti semetic and racist but even they werent into aborting the disabled.

Save Remploy Factories Online Petition

You just don't have a reasoned argument for any response anyone makes, you just jump around like a frog on acid posting uninformed comments bearing unrelated links with irrelevant arguments.

Wait....Ed Milliband...
 
so why is he allowed to stand under the ukip banner:confused: i dont remember anybody from labour supporting hitler ideology

No, but there have been instances of Labour politicians and leftwing fellow travellers supporting Soviet Union ideology...a regime every bit as repressive and murderous as the Nazis.
 
Why was there no labour people joined Mosleys Blackshirts?:confused:

Err....was not Sir Oswald Mosley (named, by the way, after a nasty little town just south-west of Accy) a member of the Labour Party in 1924? Was he not the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster in the 1929 Labour government? Then did he not leave Labour to found the New Party and then the Blackshirts (BUF)?
 
No, but there have been instances of Labour politicians and leftwing fellow travellers supporting Soviet Union ideology...a regime every bit as repressive and murderous as the Nazis.

Put a sociopath in power, surround him with sycophantic sadists, add a population exhausted by defeat, poverty, starvation, and overwhelmed by a feeling of hopelessness and you get a represive and murderous regime. It's no surprise that those on the right would be drawn to Hitler, and those on the left, to Stalin. I've no doubt they were unaware that both were insane. But there were differences between the two; some of them not so subtle. The Soviets wished to see Communism go global, mainly by sponsoring revolutionary movements ... Comintern, I believe it was called ... something like that anyway; I'm on a non google kick right now:D The Nazis, on the other hand, would do away with political subtleties and just go and take what they wanted, decimate populations, starve and work to death what was left, and usher in a tausend jahr dark age.
 
...... The Soviets wished to see Communism go global, mainly by sponsoring revolutionary movements ... Comintern, I believe it was called ... something like that anyway;

Well..possibly..bur surely this was the argument between Stalin and Trotsky and the debate between cementing revolution at home before the crackpot ideology can be exported?
 
Put a sociopath in power, surround him with sycophantic sadists, add a population exhausted by defeat, poverty, starvation, and overwhelmed by a feeling of hopelessness and you get a represive and murderous regime. It's no surprise that those on the right would be drawn to Hitler, and those on the left, to Stalin. I've no doubt they were unaware that both were insane. But there were differences between the two; some of them not so subtle. The Soviets wished to see Communism go global, mainly by sponsoring revolutionary movements ... Comintern, I believe it was called ... something like that anyway; I'm on a non google kick right now:D The Nazis, on the other hand, would do away with political subtleties and just go and take what they wanted, decimate populations, starve and work to death what was left, and usher in a tausend jahr dark age.

The Soviet Union was responsible for the deaths of millions in slave labour camps by "starving and working to death". As for "sponsoring revolutionary movements", is that what they did at the end of the war in Poland, Hungary, Rumania, East Germany etc?...seems to me they went and "took what they wanted" just like the Nazis. There is no moral difference between the Nazi system and the old Soviet system. They both dealt in repression and death to ordinary people.
 
Back
Top