it is sensible but the F.L. sure aint.Choirboy's is a sensible suggestion, track athletics uses that principle after all. My solution would be much simpler - ditch the offside rule completely. Hockey did it years ago, it opens up the game enormously (the pitch effectively becomes much bigger) and allows the officials to concentrate on other issues - like what's dirty, dangerous or just plain cheating.

if yeh think thats how its being interpreted then i feel soory for yeh mate.No complaint with var myself, the rule is quite simple if a scoring part of the body is in an off-side position your off-side, it’s a much better option than what we had before var, where the lines-person gives a decision which is totally wrong and is excepted as gospel
Nothings changed "it evens itself out over a season" hahaha.

This whole debate isn’t really about VAR but about offside.
I like Chimer’s suggestion, and have often wondered just what the impact would be in today’s game and what, other than having Jamie Vardy standing on the opponents’ goal line for 90 minutes, the offside rule is trying to prevent.
But I also thought Graeme Sounness had a good idea (it’s got to happen every now and again) to turn the rule on its head so that, if an attacker has ANY part of his body, legs, foot or armpit, behind or in line with the last defender he/she is deemed onside. That way the officials would need to see daylight between the defender and attacker to rule offside.
Agree my friend, but will never happen........Scrap it completely should never been introduced in the first place! Goal line technology ie cameras to see if the ball crossed the line should be enough, not this was it a goal or not or was it a foul or not was he offside or not!! VAR is spoiling the Beautfull game![]()