![]() |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
This is the first mention of the Hare & Hounds. Where did that come from? You're using confusion as a diversionary tactic. It wont work. You were never a politician by any chance were you? |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
I now hold the truth. Oh hek, what do I do ?
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
The Slater's Arms was 25 Plantation Street .
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I know I've said the Slaters was at nu 21, exactly where it was when it was open. Don't blame us if your dyslexic with numbers. Look at the picture & count the doorwys back from 29, remember its an Irish run so only odd numbers are used, here you go 27 comes next. Retlaw |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
You missed one, Ring o Feathers, round ducks arse:D Retlaw |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
I don't know where the Hare & Hounds was, nor do I care where it was and it hasn't been mentioned on this thread as far as I can see. Once again you are using a diversionary tactic to try and confuse us. Yes your new (but old) photo is of the Slater's when it was still open, but still proves nothing. My argument throughout is that you were wrong in saying the Slater's was at 21 Whalley Rd, because it wasn't. It was at number 13 Whalley Rd, on the corner of Marquis St and as Bob Dobson says, was demolished to make way for the construction of Broadway. That would have been sometime in the late 20's or more probable the early 30's, which I have been saying from the start. Broadway was opened to traffic on 30th June 1936 and as I've mentioned elsewhere, preparation work and demolition would have started a couple of years earlier (early 30's maybe). So a few of the nearby properties like the Slater's would have been vacated and left to fall apart even earlier, so like I have said previously, possibly late 20's - early 30's. I am of Irish descent, my mother being a Dubliner and I take a little (though not much) offence at your comment ''remember it's an Irish run'' It was very probably Irish engineers and Irish labour that built Broadway. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Is number 8 Monarch Street Ossy still there, or is it now number 10:D:D
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
[quote=blackburnlad;883204]
Quote:
[quote=blackburnlad;883538] It was at number 13 Whalley Rd, on the corner of Marquis St and as Bob Dobson says, was demolished to make way for the construction of Broadway. That would have been sometime in the late 20's or more probable the early 30's, which I have been saying from the start. Broadway was opened to traffic on 30th June 1936 and as I've mentioned elsewhere, preparation work and demolition would have started a couple of years earlier (early 30's maybe). So a few of the nearby properties like the Slater's would have been vacated and left to fall apart even earlier, so like I have said previously, possibly late 20's - early 30's. quote] Moreorless, except the Burgess Rolls still showed Alfred Westwell still living there in 1937 ... and that property did not show up in 1938. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
[QUOTE=katex;883197]
Quote:
Not quite sure what you are saying in your latest comment (#354) :confused: Could you elaborate please? |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
1 Attachment(s)
Ok ... only fair to do so.
Photo of the Burgess Roll in 1925 attached. The numbers changed to what they are now in 1948. Have a sort of theory about why. Attachment 17456 |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
[quote=blackburnlad;883567]
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
1 Attachment(s)
[quote=katex;883549]
Quote:
Those Burgess Rolls show people who are qualified to vote, the address shown is not necessarily where they live, just what qualifies them to be in the voters list. Some also have a J alongside their entry, which qualifies them to be called for jury service. Retlaw |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
2 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=katex;883577]
Quote:
Attached is a grainy old photo of that junction. Hopefully you can make out some of the names along the end building, J. L. Haworth & Co, H.Walmsley & Son and Riley & Co. Now please see the attached listing from the 1935 Barrett's Directory. You will see that all those three (Haworth's, Walmsley's and Riley's) were all listed as being at Number 11 Whalley Rd, which was Steinway House. You then have Marquis Street and over the street, you can see the gable of The Slater's Arms at Number 13 (and listed in the directory as being number 13). The original photo we have been discussing, would have been taken around the same time as the Barrett's Directory listing and wouldn't have been Number 23 as Walter said (which is what brought me into this debate), but would have been Number 13 (which is what I've been saying all along). No Barrett's directories don't make one an historian, as Walter rudely pointed out to me when I first mentioned them, on page 16 of this thread, but they are a damn sight more accurate than his census returns or his licensing reports. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
1 Attachment(s)
Another picture to add further confusion to Whalley Rd.
Retlaw. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:46. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com