Accrington Web
   

Home Gallery Arcade Blogs Members List Today's Posts
Go Back   Accrington Web > AccyWeb > General Community Talk
Donate! Join Today

General Community Talk General Hyndburn community chat.


Welcome to Accrington Web!

We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info.
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!



Like Tree2Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 24-06-2011, 15:46   #736
Senior Member+
 
park381's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

Quote:
Originally Posted by katex View Post
The 1989 one is for 172, Blackburn Road, Accrington, not Oswaldtwistle..LOL.
See the applicant on the others ... Kirkhams for their coaches.
Must get glasses changed.

It would seem that there is no application for the current project at 172 then
__________________

Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.
Albert Einstein.

park381 is offline   Reply With Quote
Accrington Web
Old 24-06-2011, 17:18   #737
Resting in Peace
 
jaysay's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

Quote:
Originally Posted by katex View Post
FTAO Jaysay re Enforcement Notices.
Looks like this guy will have no extension when he returns from abroad.
An Enforcement notice has been issued.

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/downloa...aldtwistle.pdf
Can't open the link Kate ain't got the program its written in
__________________
35 YEARS AND COUNTING
jaysay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-06-2011, 17:55   #738
Senior Member+
 
park381's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

Love it, look at the white lines for vehicle parking, think they have made a good job of it.
__________________

Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.
Albert Einstein.

park381 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2011, 09:54   #739
Resting in Peace

 
katex's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

Quote:
Originally Posted by park381 View Post
Must get glasses changed.

It would seem that there is no application for the current project at 172 then

Looks that way.

Can you take a look at this, Park, have they completely withdrawn their plans (see decisions) or maybe drawing up new ones do you think due to its proximity to the culvert ? Didn't appear to be any further correspondense after the Surveyor questioned the Environmental Agency on the run of the culvert.

Application No:11/11/0147Registration Date:15 Apr 2011Location:BRIDGE INN 135 HENRY STREET CHURCH ACCRINGTON BB5 4EPDevelopment:PROPOSED FRONT AND REAR SINGLE STOREY EXTENSIONS AND SIDE TWO STOREY EXTENSION TOGETHER WITH BOUNDARY CHANGES

Case File
katex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2011, 10:01   #740
God Member
 
MargaretR's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

I drove past the Bridge Inn Church on wednesday.
I noticed some building happening at the front.
I didn't take a good look because I was driving but got the impression of a wall under construction.
__________________



MargaretR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2011, 10:04   #741
Coffin Dodger.

 
cashman's Avatar
 
Jewel Quest Champion!
Cribbage Master Champion!

Re: Planning Applications

Quote:
Originally Posted by katex View Post
Looks that way.

Can you take a look at this, Park, have they completely withdrawn their plans (see decisions) or maybe drawing up new ones do you think due to its proximity to the culvert ? Didn't appear to be any further correspondense after the Surveyor questioned the Environmental Agency on the run of the culvert.

Application No:11/11/0147Registration Date:15 Apr 2011Location:BRIDGE INN 135 HENRY STREET CHURCH ACCRINGTON BB5 4EPDevelopment:PROPOSED FRONT AND REAR SINGLE STOREY EXTENSIONS AND SIDE TWO STOREY EXTENSION TOGETHER WITH BOUNDARY CHANGES

Case File
its a bit of a balls up kate, the culvert was not running were the authoritys said it did. this was proved by a dig, at the owners request.
__________________
N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. Do not argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
cashman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2011, 10:11   #742
Resting in Peace

 
katex's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman View Post
its a bit of a balls up kate, the culvert was not running were the authoritys said it did. this was proved by a dig, at the owners request.
Thanks, Cashy, was looking that way ... so why has the application been withdrawn do you think ?
katex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2011, 10:25   #743
Coffin Dodger.

 
cashman's Avatar
 
Jewel Quest Champion!
Cribbage Master Champion!

Re: Planning Applications

Quote:
Originally Posted by katex View Post
Thanks, Cashy, was looking that way ... so why has the application been withdrawn do you think ?
as far as i know, been a change of plan/tactic, due to extra costs incurred.
__________________
N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. Do not argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
cashman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2011, 10:37   #744
Resting in Peace

 
katex's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman View Post
as far as i know, been a change of plan/tactic, due to extra costs incurred.

Yeh, thought that may have been the case as they are too committed to back out of improvements now I suppose, having already started work on it. Shame, particularly as it looks like their Surveyor was correct in the first place re. the culvert.. made interesting reading though.
katex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2011, 11:25   #745
Senior Member+
 
park381's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

Quote:
Originally Posted by katex View Post
Yeh, thought that may have been the case as they are too committed to back out of improvements now I suppose, having already started work on it. Shame, particularly as it looks like their Surveyor was correct in the first place re. the culvert.. made interesting reading though.
See Agent's letter and EA's letter, the line of the rear extension still falls within the 8m distance of the culvert, even after correct line of culvert established.
__________________

Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.
Albert Einstein.

park381 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2011, 11:44   #746
Resting in Peace

 
katex's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

Quote:
Originally Posted by park381 View Post
See Agent's letter and EA's letter, the line of the rear extension still falls within the 8m distance of the culvert, even after correct line of culvert established.
Yes, read them a few times. Just a gap between the Surveyor asking the EA to withdraw their objection as access to the culvert was still possible even though some of the building would be within 8 metres ... but looked like extra cost may have been involved by the Bridge Inn ?

Loved the bit re. the trees and the Surveyor pointed out that trees had already been planted over the culvert at some stage .. I'm easily amused.

Last edited by katex; 25-06-2011 at 11:48.
katex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2011, 13:26   #747
Senior Member+
 
park381's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

Quote:
Originally Posted by katex View Post
Yes, read them a few times. Just a gap between the Surveyor asking the EA to withdraw their objection as access to the culvert was still possible even though some of the building would be within 8 metres ... but looked like extra cost may have been involved by the Bridge Inn ?

Loved the bit re. the trees and the Surveyor pointed out that trees had already been planted over the culvert at some stage .. I'm easily amused.
Possible new application with layout alterations to keep building line clear of the culvert. Same old problem with the trees, rules change and what is built is not always as per approved plans, once an application is passed the planning have no more involvement it's down to building control.........unless there is a complaint
__________________

Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.
Albert Einstein.

park381 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2011, 14:56   #748
God Member

 
Tealeaf's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

It looks like an area around India Street and China Street is going to become Alley Gated.

Case File

I can't see in the planning docs

a) What is the cost?

b) Is this part of the Elevate scheme?

c) If not, why has this site been chosen as against others?

d) If successful, is funding in place to extend the scheme?
Tealeaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2011, 19:25   #749
Resting in Peace

 
katex's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

Thanks, Tealeaf, noticed this in applications for Blackburn and Darwen the other week. Lot of reading in there from other councils' experiences, but interesting nevertheless.

The main statement is :

'Helping to reduce crime, fear of crime and nuisance in Lancashire'

Is this a bad area then for back alley crime ?

The applicant is HBC, but doesn't, obviously, state where funding is coming from. Could well be part of some scheme on crime prevention or summat ?
katex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2011, 19:40   #750
Resting in Peace

 
katex's Avatar
 

Re: Planning Applications

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tealeaf View Post
c) If not, why has this site been chosen as against others?
Reading a little more, does appear that residents have to apply in the first instance.

This is an interesting development for Hyndburn.
katex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools



Other sites of interest.. More town sites..




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:43.


2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1