![]() |
Lie Detector tests
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
What utter poppycock this is. Another headline grabbing initiative. There are individuals in Hyndburn who have taken more in benefits to which they are not entitled than the chap in the article below (from the national press ),and yet have not even been prosecuted, far less faced prison,despite the information to prove the case having been readily available for several years. What an absolute shambles.
''Caught digging the garden: the 'wheelchair bound' fraudster who claimed £77k in benefits A benefits cheat who claimed more than £77,000 in disability payments was filmed running his own business as a gardener and handyman. Leonard Staniland said osteoarthritis had left him confined to a wheelchair and needing round-the-clock care. But he was filmed by investigators bending over flower beds, climbing ladders and carrying patio slabs. The 62-year-old falsely claimed incapacity benefit, income support, pension credit, council tax benefit and disability living allowance over a seven-year period.'' |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Without a doubt!
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
never thought of that lancdave
what if your really nervous person, better of being drunk then, when your more relaxed and dont give a toss:D |
Re: Lie Detector tests
A lie detector test is only 96% accurate tho [yes watch too much jeremy kyle & trisha:o]
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Mind u Panther many of them are drunkards anyway:rolleyes:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
The thing thats really laughable is that no matter what the genuine claiments suffer or feel criminal by association to the benefit hence why many that need to claim some benefits actually dont - while the fraudsters dont give a crap & get as much as they can!!!
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
A very good friend of one of the Councillors of Hyndburn has taken more than 77k in benefits to which he was not entitled, yet I dont see any prosecutions having resulted.
One rule for one and one for another. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Incidentally, not only can this be proven, but I understand it has.
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
You can do it online here, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/campaigns/benefit-thieves/ or by phone on 0800 854 440. Or are you going to play Chinese whispers again, and not substantiate your claims, and by not having the strength of your convictions to actually do something about it? |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Garinda,
You are assuming others have not reported this matter. Not on an online forum but apparently in person and to all organisations affiliated to HMG that were taken for a ride. Should you think these are chinese whispers, let me put it this way. There are a few on this forum that are in possession of the facts, excluding myself. They too are staggered. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
If what you say is true, call the police. No one is above the law of the land. Name that person here, if you are so sure it is true. After all you can't be libelled if it is fact, and I'm sure if it was in the public arena the press, amongst others, would investigate your claim. Or is it a case of more hot air? |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Garinda,
Don't take this the wrong way, since it is not so intended. However, I must say that your understanding of what goes on behind the scenes as it were, is in it's infancy at best. You referred me to a 'benefit cheats' call centre. I can tell you that all they would do is refer it to the local Council and DWP after compiling the information. Thusit is far more effective to approach the fraud investigators at both directly. I understand that has been done some time ago. The evidence I have seen is compelling. It proves without doubt that benefits, including housing and Council tax benefit, have been awarded when clearly they ought not to have been. Furhter, additional awards were made even after these matters were reported. None of this money has yet been returned I understand. Should you doubt what I say, then I'm sure some of those on here who have access to the information may reinforce my view. I suspect they shall not give you the full details since it may serve as an impediment to the proposed of action that shall be undertaken going forward. Hope that helps |
Re: Lie Detector tests
No it doesn't help.
More hot air, and empty rhetoric. Blah, blah, blah. Yada, yada, yada. As stated earlier, if a crime had been committed there is always an avenue to go down...if people have the balls. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Incidentally Garinda, do you have a job? I note that you appear to be on this forum whenever I log on.
Perhaps you can contact one of the centres funded by the LCC for the same, and im sure they shall assist. I have decided not to respond to you again, since you simply wish to have an argument. I dont have time for that. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
No one is above the law. You should contact the press, your M.P., or the police if you have evidence of a fraud. You are a disgrace as a citizen. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
By the way, I'm a retired whore, and now receive an Art's Council grant to post on local forums 24/7, to show sad arses like you up.:) |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
He's actually a Hot Air Balloon Pilot. He collects the stuff from anonymous posters on community forums. Good at it isn't he ? :D |
Re: Lie Detector tests
How do you know the MP is not aware? According to my source, some Councillors did refer aspects of this matter to the MP. He, I understand, is of the view it is a matter for the Council and DWP.
However, I agree. He ought to have put his weight behind the issue. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Not suprised to see you aren't a man of your word. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Another interesting revelation. Despite you claiming to have all this knowledge of secret wheeling and dealing your information is actually gossip ? |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
:p |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
lie detector tests lol
sory but computer says no http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e2.../compsezno.jpg mind you i would ike to have a go on one i think i could beat it, suppose i better get some slapper preganant and ring trisha full of denial :D |
Re: Lie Detector tests
LOL...like that one chav1:D
also i seem to have got gondola at it again....talking...sorry, typing ****!!:D gondola ....RELAX!!!! |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Will the cost of using these methods, as they will have to be overseen by countless hordes of language/dialect interpreters, for the sake of the 'me no understand' brigade, outweigh the benefit, if in the long run the offenders uncovered are to be let off with a hand slap, or nothing done at all?
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
for a lie detector to work you would have to actualy give a crap about getting caught
luckily for me i am able to not give a crap at any given moment :D |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
personaly i think its bull because iem sure homebase could employ him as a paint mixer for starters but as things stand for now he is quite entitled to his benefit aslo dont need a lie detector with garinda , that sod cant help but sing like a canary wether you like it or not lol |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
I would imagine that any genuine claimant who is nervous and worried about losing their benefit is going to have sweating palms and quavering voice (classic symptoms of lying) whereas the don't-give-a-flying-fig brigade will be cool as a cucumber and get away with it yet again. Nice one Mr Government-Bright-Ideas Man.
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
An idea that will have the success of a manned trip to Mercury on the QEII. Wast of time and money.
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Let's face it he won't do anything that will satisfy our curiosity's he refers to us as 'readers', not, 'fellow members', he is doing us all a favour by even speaking to us whatever you do don't expect anything except to be talked down to.:) |
Re: Lie Detector tests
not quite Lie detector tests........ but I recieved this the other day
"Like a lot of folks in this state I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test, with which I have no problem. What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test. Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them?? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do on the other hand have a problem with helping someone sitting on their ass. Could you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check????? though I suppose that some folks would argue that being a drunk is a disability :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :confused: :confused: |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Bloody hell, first we had Gondola with his information, for what it was worth, when you actually found it, from an anonymous source, now you. I too know someone who works for a benefits agency, and the statement you make, that every claim by someone from an ethnic background is passed whether they are entitled to it or not, is plain wrong. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Have you asked Welfare Rights for help appealing your case Ianto?
Dorothy McGregor (Maundy Grange) helped a friend of mine too. Sometimes it comes down to knowing how to word the application. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
an alcholic gets nearly twice as much as somone led at home rotting with cancer dont get me started on people who are on disability with depression what a bloody joke cheer up you miserable sods everyone has problems and they manage to work depression is the new bad back and easier to fake to get a giro |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
blimey.. you lot could whine and moan for England!.. if you know of people that claim stuff they are not entilted to then grass em up... it's no good moaning about it.. do something!
I'm thinking of claiming incapacity for depression after reading this thread! |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Now it's gone from fact, as told to you by an 'officer of the DHSS', to only 'think'. Which is it? If claimants were given preferential treatment because of their race, which you earlier stated, don't you think just one whistle blower, out of the thousands and thousands of civil servants, would have contacted the press, for these outlandish claims to be investigated? Come to think of it, why hasn't your friend been to the press, or even to the police? As stated earlier, I have friends who who work in differing sections of this branch of the civil service, and they totally disagree with your claims. By the way, unlike your friend, they would be prepared to go public, and not hide behind anonymity. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Depression is an illness. It is as far removed from 'feeling a bit miserable' as chronic pneumonia is from having a bit of a cough. Someone suffering from clinical depression is totally incapable of 'cheering up' or 'snapping out of it' and an attitude like yours adds to the problem by loading them with additional feelings of guilt. Do you suppose for one minute anyone would choose not to 'cheer up' if they could? Because depression is an illness which cannot be seen the sufferers are treated with the sort of intollerant attitude that you wouldn't dream of treating a person with a broken limb or other physical disability. I hope you never suffer from it yourself and get faced with people with your attitude. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Come on .. be honest :D.. just imagine if you had to take a lie detector test on this site.... most of you would have been banged up for life!
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
oh i cant work no more because ime depressed i got into debt , oh i cant work because im feeling down a lot lately bollox its an illness not so long ago all you had to do was tell a doctor you were fed up a bit and you got a prescription for prozac people have genuine psycological problems that can cause them trouble but going on teh sick and disabilty because you got a bit sad that you dont like your job is not an illness its an excuse Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
We should remember one thing if the civil service can make a pigs ear of something they will. This will cost a thousand times more than it has any chance of saving.
But it doesn’t matter the faithful tax payer will foot the bill :mad: |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Quote:
Your attitude and lack of compassion for something you do not understand thoroughly disgusts me. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
if you lack the mental ability to cope with life then at least have the decency to top your self quietly so as not to bother everyone else who manages to cope |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Does anyone remember the topic of this thread or are we just fed-up with it now?
Edit: Ok, this thread has now been cleaned up, it’s not perfect but it will do. Although it’s great to see a debate argued with such passions, all we ask is, could you please refrain from insulting one and other ‘difficult at times’ I know but there's no need. :eek: Please do not reply to this post as it will be off topic and therefore deleted. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
I'll get back on thread.
I think the thought of having to take one will make some people think twice before claiming. There will always be those who dont care and will pass the test but surely the govt wont solely rely on the lie detector tests. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
I work for one branch of the DWP (what used to be DHSS or whatever you choose to call it). I can state categorically that there is no US and THEM in the decisions. (I know I make them). It is not down to race, religion, creed or whatever, it is down to whether or not you are entitled.
As for the depression Chav you have to either know someone who suffers from it or suffer from it yourself to understand it. I can understand why people have attacked you for your statements. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
If anyone had said to him "if you lack the mental ability to cope with life then at least have the decency to top your self quietly so as not to bother everyone else who manages to cope" he probably would have done it. His wife and children would not have been grateful for that - they wouldn't have felt less bothered. They would have been devastated. They'd have been heartborken because in spite of everything they love him and just wanted to get back the same old husband and father they knew. If you are someone who is able to cope with whatever life chucks at you then by all means be thankful for that but please don't belittle others who can't. I wouldn't say to someone with a physical ailment, "Look my body can handle that situation so why can't yours? Get control of it or end your less than perfect existence so the able bodied people around don't have to be troubled by the sight of your imperfect body" That would be an appalling thing to say and incredibly cruel and yet people can be equally cruel to those with invisible disabilities. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Have one of those silly little stickers on my printer Ianto which says:-
"Depression is merely anger .. without the enthusiasm" :( Perhaps so. x |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Just thought a little truth in a description of depression that's all.x |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
I used to have a mate who's nickname was depressd Harry, he was one of the funniest men I have ever met, also another one his nickname was crammed Jack. Kate, I miss the company of those two guys they never had a good word to say about anyone, but if you needed owt they would be the first in the que to help you, that was the way they handled depression by meeting it 'head on'. Crammed Jacks favourite saying was "always think the worst of everyone and you will never be dissapointed":D. Depressed Harrys favourite saying was "always borrow money off a pessimist , because he doesn't expect to get it back anyway:D.
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Who are the 'us and them' to whom you refer? |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
If you can't provide any, more's the pity. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Bagpuss,
I said I work for a part of the DWP and part of my job is making decisions, I have to make the decision backed by THE LAW!, if I can't prove tit I am not doing my job ipso facto it is a wrong decision and will be overuled on appeal. As I said before there is no bias to anyone at all and if you choose to disbelieve me state facts and show me 2 identical (and I mean identical not "my mate says..") cases I will accede to your argument. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Ianto,
Without knowing your case fully I can't comment I wasn't ignoring you. I just get fed up with the wholesale statements that say if you are "black, asian, Albanian, etc you get x amount the day you arrive " & the "If I was an illegal immigrant you'd be falling over yourself to give me money" It's b*llsh*t if you arrive in the country you have to prove you are entitled not the other way round, but of course people choose to believe what they read in the right wing press (Mail, Express, Sun etc!" rather someone who actually works there. Rant over I'll get my coat. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
The crtieria make be complicated, but they apply to everyone equally. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
As I have mentioned to you before ian the major thing about claiming these benefits is how the original form is filled in.... :)
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
I think where people perceive an inequality is that many immigrants ask for help to fill in the forms as they do not always fully understand and want to be sure they do it right. The people who help have had so much experience of helping people to fill these things in that they know what they are doing and as Harwood Red says it's all down to what you put on that initial application which is why I suggest that even though you can understand the forms and feel you know what you're doing sometime it's better to get a bit of help from someone with experience.
A family member, now deceased, had a list of ailments and disabilities as long as your arm but his DLA claim had been rejected. His condition was obviously serious enough for him to now be dead but evidently not serious enough for the DLA application - until Dorothy McGregor helped with the appeal because she had the experience of having helped others. Race, creed, colour, nationality, political affiliation or how often you change your socks had absolutely nothing to do with it. I wish you luck with your appeal Ianto. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
As well as goverment departments, it is the same with lots of organisations. Insurance companies can put so many obstacles in your way. I had an horrendous time with Saga car insurance, but I would not take no for an answer and eventually sent a letter by recorded delivery to the MD home address. I got the home address by paying for a list of directors from Companies House. That letter finally got my claim sorted out after 7 months of be without a car, due to no fault of my own. I think their strategy is that if they make the procedure complicated most people will eventually give up.
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
the sad fact is that most people claim falsely is because they cant live off what they have already!
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
From a personal view claiming benifits on behalf of someone is difficulit enough.
When my mother was diagnoised with Lung Cancer she asked me to go and live with her, this I did without question and my employers helped by letting me pick shifts that meant I would be at home at nights, and she told me that it would only be for a "few months"! She got a good care package and some extra benifits that the Social Worker in hospital told her about, when she asked about "Carer Allowence" for me she was told that as I was working during the day and that she had carers going in that she couldn't claim for me. When I asked about a stair-lift for her so that she could go upstairs to use the bath we were told that it would take approx 6 weeks to get one fitted if granted. Mother was happy about that but sadley she died after 5 weeks and never got to use her bath again, I informed the revelent office of the change in circumstances and on the day of her funeral a workman came to measure up for the stair-lift!! The information had not been passed between the departments and I think that sometimes that holds up or gets claims rejected is the lack on communications between offices..... |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
I thought most people claimed falsely because they can't be bothered to get of their backsides and get a job. After all free money, housing, education, healthcare etc etc isn't enough is it, some people need to make false claims to pay for their beer and fags as well. I have absolutely nothing against people who make genuine benefit claims, after all that is what the system is there for. I just do not like the vast number of people who think this Country owes them something. You know the ones who have never worked and think they are hard done too because they can't go out every weekend drinking with their mates. I think that many more people should be employed to catch these cheats. I don't care if it costs more to catch the cheats than the amount of benefit money saved. It comes down to the principle of not getting something you are not entitles too. Ok rant over. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
The problem with forms is complicated and a bit of a catch 22. The forms need to be complicated because they need to absolutely prove without any doubt that the person claiming is genuine - if the forms had one question 'I need the money because....' anyone and everyone would sound like a worthy cause.
But then the problem with the forms being complicated is that the genuine complainants then struggle to fill the forms in correctly so get knocked back and the expert form fillers get the money because they know what they're doing. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
i think people claim falsely because they get greedy and live beyond there means....i'm on benefits and have been for ages, i'm not proud of the fact that the state is keeping me but i would never ever dream of putting a false claim in, i get £93 a week income support and £17 odd child benefit, i get my council tax and housing benefit paid too, i'm not in any debt whatsoever, never have been,never will be, if i need anything i will either save up for it or do without, i manage just fine off what i have and my bills are ALWAYS paid, Reece never goes without and never will, i see myself going back to work in the near future, not because i will be made to but because i WANT to |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Rant only just begun!!!:mad: |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
I think its Norway where you have to have been in the country for 7 years before you're entitled to claim, if you can't afford to do that you can't go there. My mate who lives there says they dont have an immigration problem!
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
The point is THEY DON'T get them most of the time. It's a fallacy. As I said earlier if you choose to believe certain elements of the press then fine. The fact is the majority of immigrants to this country actually arrive from Europe and do so to get jobs. Not to exploit our benefit system. FFS how the hell can £55 a week be an incentive for anyone to come into a country? In fact if you arrive from Europe and you want to claim you are better off staying at home. Yes they arrive to work and in 2005 put in £126m (this figure is from a white supremacists website). They do not bleed the country dry, they do not turn up to claim benefits etc. Oh and as for the fact they are turning up stealing our jobs? Don't make me laugh, nobody here would do half the jobs they do for the salary they are being paid. In that case its the employers fault not the people doing the job. Most immigrants I actually make decisions on are not entitled. Oh and conversely most fraudulent claims are by people born here. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Open your eyes and see the truth.:mad: |
Re: Lie Detector tests
You make some valid points, Stanaccy, but there is another side to this. European immigrants, as you rightly say, are coming here to work and will do so for low wages. They do not, generally, claim Benefits but they do claim Tax Credits because, as EEC members, they are entitled to them despite never having contributed to the Exchequer before their arrival. They are not cheating and they are not given any preference but their low wages are, often, being supplemented by the State.
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
As I said in the post above blame the employers in that case not the people doing the work.
If they are doing work for less than the minimum wage and you know the employer, report them to HMRC. Don't sit there moaning do something about it. If they are doing the work for minimum wage which previously was a lot higher, then blame the employer not the person doing the work, they are the one being exploited. Get their support and start a campaign, get the unions and the press involved, name and shame. Whingeing on here will not solve anything. For all the rhetoric I have yet to see any facts.:confused: |
Re: Lie Detector tests
No-one should be working for less than the minimum wage.
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
................hmmmmmmmmm.................
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
its illegal if they are |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
Some companies have methods of working around it. I have heard of an Altham based company who have employed quite a few of the Polish people. They pay them minimum wage but they also 'sort' out their accomodation and charge them ridicolous rents and extortionate fuel prices which they take out of their wages. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
As I said, do something about it, if people have been made redundant and others taken on to do the same job for less money it's illegal (FACT the job is made redundant not the employee). If you know unscrupulous employers then publicise it. get the trades council involved Their e-mail address is here [email protected]. They currently have a campaign for a living wage for Lancashire. I have been told "by a bloke" that some folk were laid off cause of the Poles but as I have not heard any companies named specifically where it happened(I only know of 2 companies where asignifican amount of Poles work trouble recruiting because of the abysmal terms and conditions they offered) I treat it as an urban myth. If, as you say, you know different then do something, start a campaign etc. moaning here will do absolutely nothing. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
That's taking into account that these figures are open to abuse, by not classing as unemployed people on various schemes and benefits etc., but that was also applicable in the eighties, and twenty five years we didn't have the same numbers of illegal immigrants, or open borders throughout Europe. |
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
Re: Lie Detector tests
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com