![]() |
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
i dont think that would be fair would it?:confused:
I would make a rubbish mod:p |
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
Quote:
From Wikipedia: Sometimes, flamers attempt to assert their authority, or establish a position of superiority over other users. Other times, a flamer is simply an individual who believes he or she carries the only valid opinion. This leads him or her to personally attack those who disagree. Occasionally, flamers wish to upset and offend other members of the forum, in which case they can be called "trolls". |
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
I don't think it would be fair either, we all have opinions, I know you do, the difference I think is just in the way they are expressed, and the way in which they are responded to.
|
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
Quote:
Id invest in that lol |
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
Quote:
You missed by reply in your continuing rants But just in case you still haven't got the message. IT IS NOT ILLEGAL FOR ASDA TO DECIDE TO SELL TO UNDER 21's. IT IS TOTALLY UP TO THEM WHO THEY SELL TO. so time to shut up and get back to being a miserable old koot again |
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
An excerpt from a post by Jambutty in the 'Introduce Yourself' thread.
Even at 70 I still ask questions if I don’t know something. :D:D:D |
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
Quote:
You forgot: Quote:
|
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
Quote:
|
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
Sign that you have lost when all you can put as a response is that someone didn't use your full title.
Give it up now |
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
Quote:
|
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
You're even repeating yourself now!
|
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
Quote:
|
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
However, that is merely a tangent. You are missing the whole point. You have presumably not read my previous reference to the "challenge 21" scheme which is not limited to one ASDA store but is a national scheme whereby ANYONE who looks under 21 is advised that they will be challenged to prove that they are OVER 18 - please note that OVER 18, not over 21 - before they can buy alcohol. If someone did produce ID to prove that he was over 18 and then was refused he would certainly have cause to grumble but this is something you have now brought up as an aside after you have been shown to have lost your original argument. There was a case in the paper where a woman was refused because she looked under 21 and still refused even when her adult daughter proved that SHE was over 18! That just proved that a member of staff at the store in question was being plain silly, not that the store itself had an illegal policy. Quote:
Quote:
Are we really expected to believe that an AccyWebber would go to all the trouble of ringing you up to argue with you about this? :rofl38: Thanks Jambutty, for such an entertaining thread. Best laugh I've had all week. P.S. Please look at the attached images, read all of the text, take time to inwardly digest it and then have a think about it and you might just be able to understand what people have been trying to tell you. :rolleyes: |
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
Quote:
|
Re: A Law Unto Themselves?
I thought you were a forum moderator elsewhere Jambutty. Surely you must know what a troll is.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:14. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com