Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   mr britcliffe (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/mr-britcliffe-38849.html)

tosh 24-04-2008 16:39

mr britcliffe
 
mr britcliffe has a quote in the observer, conservatives have turned the council around in the past five years, he must be kidding.
he brags about the over 60s enjoying a free trip to the sea side, and we all know this is only for a month .

jaysay 24-04-2008 16:46

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tosh (Post 567221)
mr britcliffe has a quote in the observer, conservatives have turned the council around in the past five years, he must be kidding.
he brags about the over 60s enjoying a free trip to the sea side, and we all know this is only for a month .

Considering that the council had a £1.8 million budget deficit when the Tories took control and they have just been awarded an exclant mark by the Audit Commision things are certainly better than when Labour were truffed out on their ear

tosh 24-04-2008 17:44

Re: mr britcliffe
 
they might have cleard the £ .8 mill but look atb the state of the town, we have nothing.

andrewb 24-04-2008 17:46

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tosh (Post 567272)
they might have cleard the £ .8 mill but look atb the state of the town, we have nothing.

What alternatives do you propose?

Lilly 24-04-2008 17:52

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tosh (Post 567272)
look atb the state of the town, we have nothing.

That's a bit of a broad statement.
What do you mean when you say we have nothing? :confused:

garinda 24-04-2008 17:54

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tosh (Post 567221)
mr britcliffe has a quote in the observer, conservatives have turned the council around in the past five years, he must be kidding.
he brags about the over 60s enjoying a free trip to the sea side, and we all know this is only for a month .

On the same page it is claimed we have moved up the league table, from 58th up to 44th place.

Hurrah for Hyndburn!

Unfotunately it's the league table of poorest boroughs in the country, now putting us on a par with Tower Hamlets in London.

It's also noted that no less an august journal as the Daily Telegraph, politically Tory to it's core, names Hyndburn as the most expensive council in Britain.

I muist point out that all though this was on the same page as Britcliffe's tale, these facts come courtesy of Cllr. Jones.

By the way, I don't know where Britcliffe does his shopping, but it sure as hell ain't in Oswaldtwistle.

He says in his plea for votes that minced beef has gone up 64% last year, and bread has gone up 20%.

Maybe it has in Harrod's Food Hall sunshine, but I can supply the names of both a local butchers and a bakers in Oswaldtwistle where there haven't been those increases, and if he actually shopped in locally he'd know that.

andrewb 24-04-2008 18:02

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567278)

It's also noted that no less an august journal as the Daily Telegraph, politically Tory to it's core, names Hyndburn as the most expensive council in Britain.

I muist point out that all though this was on the same page as Britcliffe's tale, these facts come courtesy of Cllr. Jones.

By the way, I don't know where Britcliffe does his shopping, but it sure as hell ain't in Oswaldtwistle.

Please don't use that figure, we debated it in the other thread and it was wildly inaccurate because of the way it was calculated. Comparing BAND D properties when 70+% of houses in Accrington are band A and B.

Less 24-04-2008 18:05

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567273)
What alternatives do you propose?

Perhaps spending less on litter Police and more on the poor guys that have to clean it up?
Perhaps employing more refuse collectors rather than someone to search through ordinary folks waste, just to make sure they are recycling properly?

Using a carrot for the donkey, i.e. "excuse me Sir, but this is our town please don't throw you fag end in the street", instead of people hiding and photographing offenders just to make an extra few pounds.

I quite like our gentlemen that go around with their brush and shovel attempting to keep the streets clean, give them a bit of limelight, show people what a worthwhile job they are doing rather than paying over the odds for sneak Police. Educate the masses before you punish them!

I know it's an offence to litter, but I'm sure that people would co-operate more to gentle persuasion than something like a £70 fine, the first time I'm caught for making a mistake, (I always try to remember to use a bin), will be the time I stop searching for a bin and just watch out for the camera!
:)

garinda 24-04-2008 18:09

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567286)
Please don't use that figure, we debated it in the other thread and it was wildly inaccurate because of the way it was calculated. Comparing BAND D properties when 70+% of houses in Accrington are band A and B.

I'm just quoting what is in the Accrington Observer, and it says there in black and white that the Daily Telegraph named us as the most expensive borough in the country.

I'm just the messenger, any complaints about inaccuracies should be addressed to the legal department at the Daily Telegraph, 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1.:)

pipinfort 24-04-2008 18:13

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 567277)
That's a bit of a broad statement.
What do you mean when you say we have nothing? :confused:

Well for one its becoming a right dump.........:(

garinda 24-04-2008 18:17

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pipinfort (Post 567301)
Well for one its becoming a right dump.........:(

You're not wrong there.

Even in my relatively short life time, it's so much worse than ten, twenty, thirty years ago.

So many well loved business gone for ever, to be replaced by pound shops, empty shops, and always a sign that an area is on a steep decline, pawn brokers shops.

andrewb 24-04-2008 18:19

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567296)
I'm just quoting what is in the Accrington Observer, and it says there in black and white that the Daily Telegraph named us as the most expensive borough in the country.

I'm just the messenger, any complaints about inaccuracies should be addressed to the legal department at the Daily Telegraph, 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1.:)

I'm just saying read into things, this is a great example of why we shouldn't take everything at face value just because it's in a newspaper.

I'm not arguing against you (unless you've looked up how they got the figure and happen to still think its accurate), I know you're just quoting it.

Less 24-04-2008 18:26

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567310)
I'm just saying read into things, this is a great example of why we shouldn't take everything at face value just because it's in a newspaper.

I'm not arguing against you (

Yes you are arguing against him, you are trying to make everything rosy so far as your views are concerned, now that 'rindy has you cornered you are trying to make it seem YOU'RE educating him, I think we've seen enough of his posts to realise he doesn't need to learn much from a first year college student to know when the toilets blocked, 'cos there's a stink coming from somewhere!
:rolleyes:

garinda 24-04-2008 18:26

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567310)
I'm just saying read into things, this is a great example of why we shouldn't take everything at face value just because it's in a newspaper.

Even what Peter Britcliffe writes in this week's Observer, as to why we should vote for him?

garinda 24-04-2008 18:28

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 567317)
Yes you are arguing against him, you are trying to make everything rosy so far as your views are concerned, now that 'rindy has you cornered you are trying to make it seem YOU'RE educating him, I think we've seen enough of his posts to realise he doesn't need to learn much from a first year college student to know when the toilets blocked, 'cos there's a stink coming from somewhere!
:rolleyes:

I'm not doing any plumbing, no matter how bad the stink!:eek:

garinda 24-04-2008 18:31

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567310)
we shouldn't take everything at face value just because it's in a newspaper.


Bit it's not the Sunday Sport, the Mirror, or even the Guardian.

It comes from that bastion of right-wing politics, the Daily Telegraph no less.

Less 24-04-2008 18:33

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567322)
Bit it's not the Sunday Sport, the Mirror, or even the Guardian.

It comes from that bastion of right-wing politics, the Daily Telegraph no less.

A paper I always read given three spare hours in a day it's the best of all the rags, (except for page 3).

:o

garinda 24-04-2008 18:36

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 567325)
A paper I always read given three spare hours in a day it's the best of all the rags, (except for page 3).

:o

I like the crossword, but can only ever do Monday's one.

I think that Monday's setter must have a similar brain to mine...unhinged.:D

Less 24-04-2008 18:38

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567273)
What alternatives do you propose?

You asked I made an attempt of an answer, come on Oh wise one, surely I deserve to be put in my place?
:D

Quote:

Perhaps spending less on litter Police and more on the poor guys that have to clean it up?
Perhaps employing more refuse collectors rather than someone to search through ordinary folks waste, just to make sure they are recycling properly?

Using a carrot for the donkey, i.e. "excuse me Sir, but this is our town please don't throw you fag end in the street", instead of people hiding and photographing offenders just to make an extra few pounds.

I quite like our gentlemen that go around with their brush and shovel attempting to keep the streets clean, give them a bit of limelight, show people what a worthwhile job they are doing rather than paying over the odds for sneak Police. Educate the masses before you punish them!

I know it's an offence to litter, but I'm sure that people would co-operate more to gentle persuasion than something like a £70 fine, the first time I'm caught for making a mistake, (I always try to remember to use a bin), will be the time I stop searching for a bin and just watch out for the camera!
:)

Less 24-04-2008 18:39

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567327)
I like the crossword, but can only ever do Monday's one.

I think that Monday's setter must have a similar brain to mine...unhinged.:D

Friday's is a bummer and as for the weekends..... they should give more than a pen!

Benipete 24-04-2008 18:50

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 567329)
Friday's is a bummer and as for the weekends..... they should give more than a pen!

And a rubber's not much use either:hidewall:

andrewb 24-04-2008 19:11

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567318)
Even what Peter Britcliffe writes in this week's Observer, as to why we should vote for him?

If it cites figures then it only makes sense to have a look to see if they're accurate!

andrewb 24-04-2008 19:13

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567322)
Bit it's not the Sunday Sport, the Mirror, or even the Guardian.

It comes from that bastion of right-wing politics, the Daily Telegraph no less.

I don't care where it comes from. Look at the way they have come up with the figure, and ask if its representative of Hyndburn. You will find that it cites band D houses and does not take into account the fact that the majority of people are not paying £1500+ council tax bills.

shillelagh 24-04-2008 19:17

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567348)
I don't care where it comes from. Look at the way they have come up with the figure, and ask if its representative of Hyndburn. You will find that it cites band D houses and does not take into account the fact that the majority of people are not paying £1500+ council tax bills.


If theyve used band D across all the councils well then its fair. If they used band A from hyndburn, band c from rossendale, band b from blackburn - thats not fair is it.

andrewb 24-04-2008 19:18

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 567317)
Yes you are arguing against him, you are trying to make everything rosy so far as your views are concerned, now that 'rindy has you cornered you are trying to make it seem YOU'RE educating him, I think we've seen enough of his posts to realise he doesn't need to learn much from a first year college student to know when the toilets blocked, 'cos there's a stink coming from somewhere!
:rolleyes:

I'm arguing against the figures. He said he was simply quoting so how can I argue against him?

I'm not painting everything as rosy, but I am saying that we are not the most expensive council. It matters a great deal which band they surveyed. If you calculate it using what's actually happening in reality, you'll see that a MUCH lower percentage of income goes to council tax than it states.

The figure is worked out from average salary and then what percentage of income goes to council tax if you're in BAND D. Considering most people living in band D properties have an income of more than £17,000 it's not at all accurate.

Less 24-04-2008 19:20

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567348)
I don't care where it comes from. Look at the way they have come up with the figure, and ask if its representative of Hyndburn. You will find that it cites band D houses and does not take into account the fact that the majority of people are not paying £1500+ council tax bills.

Proper little politician, only answering what you've been briefed to answer and ignoring everything else!

You asked a question, you got an answer, now please tell me what is right or what is wrong, what is too simplistic or what is too complex about my answer or even how irrelivant it is, but at least have the courtesy to answer!

Don't just ignore it because it wasn't part of today's course lecture.

:(

andrewb 24-04-2008 19:20

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shillelagh (Post 567352)
If theyve used band D across all the councils well then its fair. If they used band A from hyndburn, band c from rossendale, band b from blackburn - thats not fair is it.

How is it fair? Every constituency has different numbers of households under band A, B, C, D.. It was done on band D to compare the north to the south, and of course it looks like the north is more expensive because the average incomes are lower, but they're still comparing band D property.

andrewb 24-04-2008 19:41

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 567357)
Proper little politician, only answering what you've been briefed to answer and ignoring everything else!

You asked a question, you got an answer, now please tell me what is right or what is wrong, what is too simplistic or what is too complex about my answer or even how irrelivant it is, but at least have the courtesy to answer!

Don't just ignore it because it wasn't part of today's course lecture.

:(

See the post above yours?

Don't try and paint me as stupid because I'm a student. I haven't learnt about this from any lecture, I did the research in my own time. Trying to belittle somebody because of their age really doesn't wash.

Loz 24-04-2008 19:53

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Well considering they take £1200 a year from me and my fiance in council tax i would say they are expensive.
Between us we only earn around £15,000 it is a sizeable chunk of our income.
What the hell do you get for this money anyway?
It's a joke in my opinion,how do they justify it?

Less 24-04-2008 20:03

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567370)
See the post above yours?

Don't try and paint me as stupid because I'm a student. I haven't learnt about this from any lecture, I did the research in my own time. Trying to belittle somebody because of their age really doesn't wash.

And that is your answer?

You would rather cry about me teasing you for being a student rather than reply to something, about which after all, you, asked the question:-

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567273)
What alternatives do you propose?

Believe it or not I happen to be a floating voter, I have never tied myself to one political party because I believe we all change some of our view points, two things have me thinking tonight however, one was a Labour representative that put a leaflet through my door but couldn't be arsed to close my gate! (proof of a caring party), the other is a blinkered young tory that instead of talking common sense hides behind 'facts & figures' that we all know can be manipulated either to suit us or to be dismissed as inaccurate.

Now can I ask you to come out from behind your smoke screen, stop pretending I've upset the inner student and reply to what I posted in reply to you?
:confused:

Neil 24-04-2008 21:19

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 567290)
Educate the masses before you punish them!

Why?
Do you think some people don't know it is wrong to drop litter?
I think everyone knows it is wrong and they do it anyway.

I don't want my tax money being spent telling people it is wrong to litter. I want them fining for doing it and the fine money used to clear up the mess. Better still the people who litter should be forced to do the cleaning up.

Neil 24-04-2008 21:25

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 567228)
Considering that the council had a £1.8 million budget deficit when the Tories took control

I think people tend to forget that when they moan about spending cuts. You recover £1.8 million without something losing out.

andrewb 25-04-2008 01:44

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 567377)
And that is your answer?

You would rather cry about me teasing you for being a student rather than reply to something, about which after all, you, asked the question:-



Believe it or not I happen to be a floating voter, I have never tied myself to one political party because I believe we all change some of our view points, two things have me thinking tonight however, one was a Labour representative that put a leaflet through my door but couldn't be arsed to close my gate! (proof of a caring party), the other is a blinkered young tory that instead of talking common sense hides behind 'facts & figures' that we all know can be manipulated either to suit us or to be dismissed as inaccurate.

Now can I ask you to come out from behind your smoke screen, stop pretending I've upset the inner student and reply to what I posted in reply to you?
:confused:

I have replied, have I not? the post above where you said I hadn't replied?

MikeSz 25-04-2008 08:01

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Food for thought when considering council tax :

"About how Council Tax is spent

In the tax year 2007/2008, 72.7% of the Council Tax bill is collected on behalf of Lancashire County Council, Hyndburn Borough Council receives 14.5%, 8.8% goes to Lancashire Police Authority and 4% goes to Lancashire Fire Authority.

So for a band D property paying £1438.88 Council Tax;
  • £1046.20 goes to Lancashire County Council
  • £209.29 goes to Hyndburn Borough Council
  • £125.95 goes to Lancashire Police Authority
  • £57.44 goes to Lancashire Fire Authority
"

(taken from HBC website)

Many people forget that unlike Blackburn with Darwen, which is unitary, HBC falls under Lancashire County Council - which takes the vast majority of your council tax.

jaysay 25-04-2008 09:35

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeSz (Post 567502)
Food for thought when considering council tax :

"About how Council Tax is spent

In the tax year 2007/2008, 72.7% of the Council Tax bill is collected on behalf of Lancashire County Council, Hyndburn Borough Council receives 14.5%, 8.8% goes to Lancashire Police Authority and 4% goes to Lancashire Fire Authority.

So for a band D property paying £1438.88 Council Tax;
  • £1046.20 goes to Lancashire County Council
  • £209.29 goes to Hyndburn Borough Council
  • £125.95 goes to Lancashire Police Authority
  • £57.44 goes to Lancashire Fire Authority
"

(taken from HBC website)

Many people forget that unlike Blackburn with Darwen, which is unitary, HBC falls under Lancashire County Council - which takes the vast majority of your council tax.

Thanks for pointing that out before I had a chance Mike. On the same observer page Graham Jones states that the Tories have increased Council Tax by 45% since taking conrol, spot on Graham, but what he doesn't tell you is that in that same period LABOUR CONTROLLED LANCASHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL have increased their share by 95%:eek:. As mike has said we live in a two tier authority, with finances being split (for easy recKoning 80% LCC 20% HBC), lets just say that 8 years ago the council tax was £500 Band A, (this is just a round figure to explain) 400 going to LCC £100 to HBC, 95% rise at county would take there share to £780 whilst HBC share would go to £145, now who is costing you more Labour or Conservative. Has Neil said in a later post when you are left with a £1.8 million black hole something has to give, and according to the Audit Commision Hyndburn has turn their fortunes around from poor five years ago to excellant today, and they are the independant body which control council

garinda 25-04-2008 09:50

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 567530)
according to the Audit Commision Hyndburn has turn their fortunes around from poor five years ago to excellant today, and they are the independant body which control council

If polled I wonder how many of the people actually living in Hyndburn would rate the quality of services provided by the council as being 'excellent'?

jaysay 25-04-2008 10:28

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567536)
If polled I wonder how many of the people actually living in Hyndburn would rate the quality of services provided by the council as being 'excellent'?

You can't do anything until your finances are in order, the thing is Rindi for all his posturing Cllr Jones couldn't even put an alternative budget forward, at the budget meeting, seems he has problems with is calculator, I tend not the blame a machine I tend to think its the clown thats putting the information in that causes the porblem.:rolleyes:

MikeSz 25-04-2008 11:42

Re: mr britcliffe
 
And here's another important point that is often overlooked - from what I understand, HBC had a debt of about £42m 8 years ago. As far as I know, that debt has now been reduced to about £14 million since. To put that in context, try embarking on a a massive saving mission, whilst still ensuring you're paying for everything that you need, whilst ensuring that additional money gets invested, whilst having someone else above you largely controlling your purse strings. No easy feat. Its very easy to criticise so try thinking how that would equate into your own income and spending patterns before dismissing the Council.

For a region like Hyndburn, good, sensible, cost effective local government is surely all you need and I think that is exactly what is being delivered.

garinda 25-04-2008 11:54

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Admittedly I didn't live in Hyndburn the last time we had a Labour controlled council, though I did used to visit every month or so.

What is apparent to anyone with half a brain cell is that the area is now more run down than ten years ago.

Under a Tory run council we have seen the death of the outside market, once one of the busiest in the northwest.

At a cost of many millions of pounds the bus station was moved to accommodate the new market, and suprise suprise the council are planning on relocating it again, again at more cost.

We've seen the Conservative run council allow more new retail premises to be built in the area, many of them now stood empty, while long established businesses have gone to the wall, or relocated elsewhere. The economic retail boom that the country has experienced, certainly never made it to Hyndburn.

We may have pretty floral towers, but Accrington as a town is dieing on it's backside because of the woeful inability of the council to govern for the good of the people and the area.

MikeSz 25-04-2008 12:25

Re: mr britcliffe
 
I think an area being 'run down' (and even the definition of 'run down' could be extended to include pretty much anything) is down to a number of factors and its a bit simplistic to try and blame the council. It depends on what you're talking about - if its a building who owns it, why its 'run down' in the first place and what it would take to fix it or deal with it if it cant be fixed. Of course things can always be done better, and that’s why debates are important rather than simply apportioning blame.

I think some important steps have been taken – parking is still free in Hyndburn, and that’s something that local businesses have made clear they want.

Unfortunately however, you cant force people to shop at a market – I travel the country quite a lot and regrettably lots of markets, some traditionally large ones are now struggling. I know Wolverhampton’s, despite having a large open market square, and being a statute defined market town, now only has about 1/5th of its market. Economic and commercial forces are large, complex and intertwined and are changing the way we shop. We also have changing work/life patterns which effect when and where people shop. I accept you may not like HBC and I’m not asking you to change you’re mind, just realise that you cant really blame HBC for people not shopping at the market anymore.

garinda 25-04-2008 12:33

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeSz (Post 567564)

Unfortunately however, you cant force people to shop at a market

No you can't, but before the council in it's wisdom decided at some considerable cost to interfere with the market, people chose to shop there, as did the market traders who chose to sell there, because it was busy and vibrant, something it certainly isn't now. I've been to less depressing markets in poverty stricken African countries.

Personally I'd be afraid to let the present shower organise a jumble sale, nevermind be in charge of a multi-million pound budget, and town planning.

blazey 25-04-2008 13:06

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Why are people blaming the Tories for pound shops?

garinda 25-04-2008 13:17

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blazey (Post 567577)
Why are people blaming the Tories for pound shops?

Because for those of us old enough to remember, Accrington used to be a thriving town, before the council involved themselves with the costly 'regeneration' of the town centre, and followed a policy of building even more retail premises, whilst we already had a plethora of empty shops.

Empty shops that because of high council tax rates are now only attractive to charity, and cut price shops.

cashman 25-04-2008 13:40

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567581)
Because for those of us old enough to remember, Accrington used to be a thriving town, before the council involved themselves with the costly 'regeneration' of the town centre.

Empty shops that because of high council tax rates are now only attractive to charity, and cut price shops.

you got it in 1 rindy, have a couple of friends that had thriving small businesses in the town centre, who gave up the ghost, n that was the final nail in their coffin.

andrewb 25-04-2008 14:31

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567581)
Because for those of us old enough to remember, Accrington used to be a thriving town, before the council involved themselves with the costly 'regeneration' of the town centre, and followed a policy of building even more retail premises, whilst we already had a plethora of empty shops.

Empty shops that because of high council tax rates are now only attractive to charity, and cut price shops.

Sorry am I understanding this correctly? The reason our town has gone to pot is because the local council set tax too high on shops, therefore only the pound and charity shops have the economic might to stay open?

cashman 25-04-2008 14:40

Re: mr britcliffe
 
no i don't think yer understanding it correctly. nor do i think ya want too.:rolleyes:

andrewb 25-04-2008 14:55

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 567607)
no i don't think yer understanding it correctly. nor do i think ya want too.:rolleyes:

How very constructive. I do want to understand it, I don't see how pound shops and charity shops are the only ones able to stay in our town where as other retailers can't, because of apparently high tax.

Please can you explain it to me?

jaysay 25-04-2008 16:05

Re: mr britcliffe
 
I also think that you have to go back to the days of George Slynn to see when the rot set in when they were selling anything they could get their hands on, the buses, Arndale centre, the bus depot, the land on Eastgate, and other asset all ploughed into the Globe Centre. It was also in that period that the marked started to go kaput, I once remember writting to the Obs stating that the market had become like a derelict wild west town, the only thing missing were the tumble weeds blowing about and that was in the mid nineties

lindsay ormerod 25-04-2008 16:44

Re: mr britcliffe
 
I thought the charity shops got cheaper leases?
It certainly used to work that way, and the pound shops are the only ones making money !

andrewb 25-04-2008 17:16

Re: mr britcliffe
 
I've got my hands on an Observer and just read the columns. I have no idea how Graham Jones has the nerve to say some of those things!

"How did council tax rise by 45% and nobody did anything"

Well firstly it's nice to see he used the correct figure. However how is this a bad thing? Have you looked at how much council tax rises have been on average throughout the rest of the country? Over 100%! We have a 45% rise, how is this BAD?

Every year except the last one or two the Labour group on council have proposed HIGHER council tax increases than the Conservatives! Complete hypocrisy! I suspect the only reason they've done it differently this year is for short term political gain.

"The Daily Telegraph put Hyndburn Borough Council as the most expensive council in Britain yet local Conservatives are sure they will retain power easily."


I have explained this over and over in several threads here, he has clearly failed to take any notice, and using the fact that people will take the figure at face value to gain politically. When you actually look at how the Telegraph got to that figure it nowhere near represents Hyndburn. If you're reading this Graham I'm happy to meet up with you and discuss it.

"..we still have a poor performing, high Council Tax council."

As I've said before our council tax is much less than a lot of other people are paying. The Labour national government have put HUGE pressures on local councils by delegating more responsibility without fully funding it. Council tax has to go up to deal with these things, but it appears that our council has done well to keep the increases relatively small.

"more dictatorship, or a change of direction, free speech and democracy"

Does he seriously realise what he's writing? I have no quarrel with what he's saying about increasing democracy. I think its a good thing he wants greater democracy with more people contributing, but how can anyone suggest that a Conservative council is currently a dictatorship, that we don't have free speech? Those words are reserved for North Korea not Accrington.

Then finally he gos on to talk about how Blackburn Council have introduced free sports, yet makes the comparison between Blackburn and Hyndburn. How can you make this comparison? Blackburn with Darwen is a unitary authority, they get ALL the money in council tax. Our local council get around 20% with around 80% going to Lancashire County Council!

Boeing Guy 25-04-2008 17:31

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Cyfr, mate its a bit like the Global Warming / ID Card etc scheme.
"My mind is made up, don't confuse me with the facts!", comes to mind:hidewall:

garinda 25-04-2008 18:32

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567604)
Sorry am I understanding this correctly? The reason our town has gone to pot is because the local council set tax too high on shops, therefore only the pound and charity shops have the economic might to stay open?

It's supply and demand.

If you already have a plentiful stock of empty retail premises, as a council it isn't really wise to build a whole lot more, which this council has, with plans for even more behind Scaitcliffe House.

They are also responsible for setting the business rates tax.

It doesn't take the greatest economic brain in the land to work out that the council would get more income from occupied rather than empty shops, something we now have a plethora of.

It was only last year Britcliffe was boasting in the press of new businesses that had opened in the area. Well I can name three on his list that have since closed.

I remember you posted that you were also opposed to the council giving planning permission to open a town centre Tesco, partly I presume because you know what effect it would have on existing town centre traders, your father included.

garinda 25-04-2008 18:52

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567659)
I've got my hands on an Observer and just read the columns. I have no idea how Graham Jones has the nerve to say some of those things!

"How did council tax rise by 45% and nobody did anything"

Well firstly it's nice to see he used the correct figure. However how is this a bad thing? Have you looked at how much council tax rises have been on average throughout the rest of the country? Over 100%! We have a 45% rise, how is this BAD?

Every year except the last one or two the Labour group on council have proposed HIGHER council tax increases than the Conservatives! Complete hypocrisy! I suspect the only reason they've done it differently this year is for short term political gain.

"The Daily Telegraph put Hyndburn Borough Council as the most expensive council in Britain yet local Conservatives are sure they will retain power easily."

I have explained this over and over in several threads here, he has clearly failed to take any notice, and using the fact that people will take the figure at face value to gain politically. When you actually look at how the Telegraph got to that figure it nowhere near represents Hyndburn. If you're reading this Graham I'm happy to meet up with you and discuss it.

"..we still have a poor performing, high Council Tax council."

As I've said before our council tax is much less than a lot of other people are paying. The Labour national government have put HUGE pressures on local councils by delegating more responsibility without fully funding it. Council tax has to go up to deal with these things, but it appears that our council has done well to keep the increases relatively small.

"more dictatorship, or a change of direction, free speech and democracy"

Does he seriously realise what he's writing? I have no quarrel with what he's saying about increasing democracy. I think its a good thing he wants greater democracy with more people contributing, but how can anyone suggest that a Conservative council is currently a dictatorship, that we don't have free speech? Those words are reserved for North Korea not Accrington.

Then finally he gos on to talk about how Blackburn Council have introduced free sports, yet makes the comparison between Blackburn and Hyndburn. How can you make this comparison? Blackburn with Darwen is a unitary authority, they get ALL the money in council tax. Our local council get around 20% with around 80% going to Lancashire County Council!

All that time spent beavering away in the library, tapping away on your calculator, and Graham Jones remains unconvinced, and publishes the facts as found by the Daily Telegraph.:rolleyes:

Lilly 25-04-2008 21:04

Re: mr britcliffe
 
I don't think the council can take all the blame for the rubbish selection of shops we have.

There may be some of us who would spend our money in an Accrington branch of Next or River Island but it seems we are in the minority.

Store chains do their research and check out the buying habits of the population before setting up in a town.

Sadly, they will be able to see that they wouldn't last long in Accrington because so many people want the dirt cheap stuff. :(

garinda 25-04-2008 21:31

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 567750)
I don't think the council can take all the blame for the rubbish selection of shops we have.

But they must take the blame for continuing to build even more retail premises when there are already so many empty shops.

andrewb 25-04-2008 21:52

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567688)
It's supply and demand.

If you already have a plentiful stock of empty retail premises, as a council it isn't really wise to build a whole lot more, which this council has, with plans for even more behind Scaitcliffe House.

They are also responsible for setting the business rates tax.

It doesn't take the greatest economic brain in the land to work out that the council would get more income from occupied rather than empty shops, something we now have a plethora of.

It was only last year Britcliffe was boasting in the press of new businesses that had opened in the area. Well I can name three on his list that have since closed.

I remember you posted that you were also opposed to the council giving planning permission to open a town centre Tesco, partly I presume because you know what effect it would have on existing town centre traders, your father included.

Yes my question was why does apparently high tax result in only charity and pound shops? I understand the concept of not being able to tax shops if they're empty ;)

garinda 25-04-2008 22:07

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567759)
Yes my question was why does apparently high tax result in only charity and pound shops? I understand the concept of not being able to tax shops if they're empty ;)

Sorry, I thought Lindsay had already answered that, but here it is in fuller detail.

Charity shops benefit from exemption from corporation tax on profits, 80% mandatory rate relief and a zero V.A.T. rating on the sale of donated goods. A further 20% rate relief is available at the discretion of local authorities.

Mass volume sales stores, aka pound shops, have a relatively high turnover, and that results in them being one of only a few type of businesses that can afford the expensive rent and rates that the owners of the retail spaces charge, the owners our council gave planning permission to.

Fairly straight forward really.;)

onlyme 25-04-2008 22:20

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 567750)
I don't think the council can take all the blame for the rubbish selection of shops we have.

There may be some of us who would spend our money in an Accrington branch of Next or River Island but it seems we are in the minority.

Store chains do their research and check out the buying habits of the population before setting up in a town.

Sadly, they will be able to see that they wouldn't last long in Accrington because so many people want the dirt cheap stuff. :(

Exactly Lilly

And I dont think its because of local government that we have a shoddy selection of retail shops.

Lets face it, Accrington used to be a busy town with its own industry and business. As the global marketplace has opened up, manufacturing is cheaper to do abroad, and the money has leaked out of the area.

How many people remember the closure of Rist wires when that was relocated? Approx 600 people out of work, in a town without the jobs that they can fall into.

I think the current government has more fault than local for the problems in the area. If there werent so much of a North/South divide, the local area would improve no end.

Also, going back to the initial posts, I think the fact that the new health centre on Blackburn Road was open for less than a week before the windows were smashed in shows that gentle persuasion, or even a pride in the area is not happenning

andrewb 25-04-2008 22:35

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567761)
Sorry, I thought Lindsay had already answered that, but here it is in fuller detail.

Charity shops benefit from exemption from corporation tax on profits, 80% mandatory rate relief and a zero V.A.T. rating on the sale of donated goods. A further 20% rate relief is available at the discretion of local authorities.

Mass volume sales stores, aka pound shops, have a relatively high turnover, and that results in them being one of only a few type of businesses that can afford the expensive rent and rates that the owners of the retail spaces charge, the owners our council gave planning permission to.

Fairly straight forward really.;)

So it's to do with demographic. As pound stores are much more popular in Accrington than a more expensive retailer.

Can you please let me have the figures for the expensive rent/rates you talk of?

garinda 25-04-2008 22:36

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyme (Post 567765)
the money has leaked out of the area.

It may not feel like it but even here in Hyndburn we've never had such a large disposable income.

Thirty five years ago the majority of people in Hyndburn didn't own a car. Now we have two car households, and many people, even those on benefits, have homes filled with the latest flat screened televisions, and all manor of electrical equipment.

Sadly much of this income is being spent in Hyndburn.

garinda 25-04-2008 22:40

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567767)

Can you please let me have the figures for the expensive rent/rates you talk of?

In a word no.

Do it yourself.

A quick search on any local commercial estate agent's site will prove my point.

Lancsdave posted the other week of the extortionate rent wanted for one empty retail unit in the Arndale, if you care to search through his posts.

onlyme 25-04-2008 22:44

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567768)
It may not feel like it but even here in Hyndburn we've never had such a large disposable income.

Thirty five years ago the majority of people in Hyndburn didn't own a car. Now we have two car households, and many people, even those on benefits, have homes filled with the latest flat screened televisions, and all manor of electrical equipment.

Sadly much of this income is being spent in Hyndburn.

I know what you mean, however I think credit has become easier, or more socially acceptable and its easier to buy these things, just harder to pay for them. I also think there is more peer pressure or 'keeping up with the Joneses' these days, and so people get upto their neck in debt, and so normal everyday buying suffers.

I am no huge political fan or take great interest in facts and figures, but would be interesting to know the %age difference between unemployed 10 years ago compared to now

andrewb 25-04-2008 22:52

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567770)
In a word no.

Do it yourself.

A quick search on any local commercial estate agent's site will prove my point.

Lancsdave posted the other week of the extortionate rent wanted for one empty retail unit in the Arndale, if you care to search through his posts.

Lets take the arndale example: £25,440 for the year.

Retailers, even in Accrington, have had turnover more than £10,000 in a day. Is the rent really that expensive when you look at it like that?

katex 25-04-2008 22:52

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 567750)
There may be some of us who would spend our money in an Accrington branch of Next or River Island but it seems we are in the minority.

:(

Seemingly, the council did ask Next if they were interested in our town Lilly, but they turned us down (for the time being), probably holding out to see if anything moves on the proposed retail park at Whitebirk.... only my assumptions here though.

Don't think us Next/River Island/Oasis/Warehouse/Jane Norman buyers are in the minority at all. Now acquiring a large immigrant population, and they love these high street stores. Once they are there .. people will buy. Unfortunately, the Council members are not sales people, and do not know how to put forward a decent proposal.

Neil 25-04-2008 22:59

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567536)
If polled I wonder how many of the people actually living in Hyndburn would rate the quality of services provided by the council as being 'excellent'?

The problem is knowing which Council is responsible for the service in question. My bins are always emptied which is HBC. The roads are in a very poor state which is LCC. The park is in a mess which is HBC, the trouble with that one is it has been in a mess for so long which Council was in power when it went down hill? Labour or Tory, I am not sure. We just blame HBC for things which means the Tories at the moment.

garinda 25-04-2008 23:01

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 567773)
the Council members are not sales people, and do not know how to put forward a decent proposal.

That's a very important point.

We give massive budgets to people with no proven record in the commercial world, when really a lot of them would struggle to use an Etch A Sketch, never mind plan a long term retail stategy for the area.

Royboy39 25-04-2008 23:03

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567776)
That's a very important point.

We give massive budgets to people with no proven record in the commercial world, when really a lot of them would struggle to use an Etch A Sketch, never mind plan a long term retail stategy for the area.

OK....I accept that......put your name forward for council?

garinda 25-04-2008 23:04

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 567774)
The problem is knowing which Council is responsible for the service in question. My bins are always emptied which is HBC. The roads are in a very poor state which is LCC. The park is in a mess which is HBC, the trouble with that one is it has been in a mess for so long which Council was in power when it went down hill? Labour or Tory, I am not sure. We just blame HBC for things which means the Tories at the moment.

I'm well aware that although our council is presently Conservative run, it is made up of councillors of all parties. Many of whom are more intent on squabbling with each other rather than working together for the good of the borough.

Neil 25-04-2008 23:05

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567776)
We give massive budgets to people with no proven record in the commercial world, when really a lot of them would struggle to use an Etch A Sketch, never mind plan a long term retail stategy for the area.

I have said that many times, well not the etch a sketch bit.

I will tell you a story when I see you next about a Councillor - remind me

garinda 25-04-2008 23:06

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 567779)
I have said that many times, well not the etch a sketch bit.

I will tell you a story when I see you next about a Councillor - remind me

Oh goodie.

It's not like you to spill the political beans...well not many.:D

andrewb 25-04-2008 23:08

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Me too Rindi, remind me :p

Royboy39 25-04-2008 23:10

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Royboy39 (Post 567777)
OK....I accept that......put your name forward for council?

I forgot....I'm on his No No list :dancedog:

Rindy for council ?????

onlyme 25-04-2008 23:12

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 567773)
Seemingly, the council did ask Next if they were interested in our town Lilly, but they turned us down (for the time being), probably holding out to see if anything moves on the proposed retail park at Whitebirk.... only my assumptions here though.

Don't think us Next/River Island/Oasis/Warehouse/Jane Norman buyers are in the minority at all. Now acquiring a large immigrant population, and they love these high street stores. Once they are there .. people will buy. Unfortunately, the Council members are not sales people, and do not know how to put forward a decent proposal.

Exactly and the point can be carried on to so many other things. Public sector should be run as a business, with sales, marketing and all that mullarkey. The sooner local government start doing that, and looking to make money the better

onlyme 25-04-2008 23:13

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Royboy39 (Post 567783)
I forgot....I'm on his No No list :dancedog:

Rindy for council ?????

Have to admit, I would actually probably vote for Rindy, even if I disagree with his opinion, I can at least understand where its coming from.

Besides, he doesnt waffle which i feel is a real pre-requisite for my all important vote lol

garinda 25-04-2008 23:14

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567782)
Me too Rindi, remind me :p

Since I'll be seeing you at the theatre tomorrow you can spill your dirt before Neil tells me his gossip re: a councillor.;)

garinda 25-04-2008 23:16

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyme (Post 567787)
Have to admit, I would actually probably vote for Rindy, even if I disagree with his opinion, I can at least understand where its coming from.

Besides, he doesnt waffle which i feel is a real pre-requisite for my all important vote lol

I feel like I've waffled for days, it's about time I started being silly again.:rolleyes:

onlyme 25-04-2008 23:24

Re: mr britcliffe
 
You seem to follow the principle of 'why use 10 words when 1 will do'. That'll do for me.

jaysay 26-04-2008 09:13

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567790)
I feel like I've waffled for days, it's about time I started being silly again.:rolleyes:

What do you mean feel Rindi you have and you know it, and I agree start being silly then that will be two of use, I'm lonely on my own:D:D:D:eek:

garinda 26-04-2008 09:16

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 567837)
What do you mean feel Rindi you have and you know it, and I agree start being silly then that will be two of use, I'm lonely on my own:D:D:D:eek:

Lol, ok I'll start being silly.:p

I love Cameron's new brand of caring, sharing Conservatism, or Tory-Lite as the new brand is apparently called.:D

garinda 26-04-2008 09:18

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 567837)
What do you mean feel Rindi you have and you know it, and I agree start being silly then that will be two of use, I'm lonely on my own:D:D:D:eek:

By the way, I couldn't have waffled without the help of my two non-stick waffle makers.;)

jaysay 26-04-2008 09:30

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567839)
Lol, ok I'll start being silly.:p

I love Cameron's new brand of caring, sharing Conservatism, or Tory-Lite as the new brand is apparently called.:D

Thats more like the Rindi we know a like, keep it up old chap:D:rolleyes:

Lilly 26-04-2008 12:17

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567789)
Since I'll be seeing you at the theatre tomorrow you can spill your dirt before Neil tells me his gossip re: a councillor.;)

Lmao at you, Cyfr and Neil!

You're like Ena, Martha and Minnie. :hehetable

jaysay 26-04-2008 14:04

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 567883)
Lmao at you, Cyfr and Neil!

You're like Ena, Martha and Minnie. :hehetable

Lilly you'll have the trio spinnin in their graves:D

andrewb 26-04-2008 16:36

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 567789)
Since I'll be seeing you at the theatre tomorrow you can spill your dirt before Neil tells me his gossip re: a councillor.;)

The amusing thing is it was that important that I don't remember what it was now. I shall have a think!

g jones 26-04-2008 18:04

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 567228)
Considering that the council had a £1.8 million budget deficit when the Tories took control and they have just been awarded an exclant mark by the Audit Commision things are certainly better than when Labour were truffed out on their ear

The Tories overspent by 450k in THEIR first quarter (ie projected £1.8m loss) and blamed Labour for the year before, despite the books balancing in Labour's year. Just thought I'd put the record straight.

g jones 26-04-2008 18:16

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeSz (Post 567554)
And here's another important point that is often overlooked - from what I understand, HBC had a debt of about £42m 8 years ago. As far as I know, that debt has now been reduced to about £14 million since.

It was £42m - it peaked at £46m. £22m for Council Housing and £26m for the Council Tax Payer. When The Council Houses were transferred the Council had the £22m wiped out PLUS another £10m which reduced the Councils' debt to £16m currently.

It has not increased because Gordon Brown has for 3 years financed the Council's Capital Programme. We normally borrow £2m each year but he has given us £2.5m per year. £7.5m. So we don't have to borrow.

An important question is where are all the interest savings on the £10m debt write off being spent? The savings figure is around £900,000 per annum by the way. Also to consider that Council House sales receipts have risen sharply with house prices. This all comes to the Council so where has this money gone too. And we spent 450k on Concessionary Fares prior to any national scheme. Now we have the Government scheme, the Council's scheme has been scraped. So where's that 450K a year gone?

g jones 26-04-2008 18:20

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567604)
Sorry am I understanding this correctly? The reason our town has gone to pot is because the local council set tax too high on shops, therefore only the pound and charity shops have the economic might to stay open?

No, it's many factors combined. However building utopian white elephants like the Walker Development on an old thriving market was a disaster.

g jones 26-04-2008 18:24

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 567629)
I also think that you have to go back to the days of George Slynn to see when the rot set in when they were selling anything they could get their hands on, the buses, Arndale centre, the bus depot, the land on Eastgate, and other asset all ploughed into the Globe Centre. It was also in that period that the marked started to go kaput, I once remember writting to the Obs stating that the market had become like a derelict wild west town, the only thing missing were the tumble weeds blowing about and that was in the mid nineties

George Slynn was neither my cup of tea either. But he at least put together a £4million Town Centre plan but the lottery funding £2m fell through and he lost control (1999) to the Tories.

Only two leaders have contributed anything significant to this Borough in the last 20 years. George did the Globe Centre bringing 100's of jobs to the Borough. Ian Ormerod on a lesser scale sacked the senior management at the Council leading to a mini revival.

Neil 26-04-2008 18:30

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 568078)
£22m for Council Housing

Graham, how the hell could the Council Housing be £22 million in debt? Surely the house rent pays for everything for the houses? If not why are the rents too low?


Sorry about all the questions but I can't understand how that could happen.

g jones 26-04-2008 18:37

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 568081)
Graham, how the hell could the Council Housing be £22 million in debt? Surely the house rent pays for everything for the houses? If not why are the rents too low?


Sorry about all the questions but I can't understand how that could happen.

The HRA loans were around £22m, might have been £23m when the were repaid. No idea how it was that. Presume previous Housing schemes???? Might have been from some of the 70's builds as the loans were generally taken over 40-60 years? Need to check back for a proper answer.

Your referring to the HRA account (like a current account as opposed to the loans account). That has a surplus on close of around £450k. That has now gone into the Council's coffer's this year and a reason for the healthy accounts though it was tenants money. Part of the transfer agreement.

andrewb 27-04-2008 00:41

Re: mr britcliffe
 
I do hope you've missed by post on page 4 and are not just avoiding it for electoral purposes.

jaysay 27-04-2008 09:09

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 568080)
George Slynn was neither my cup of tea either. But he at least put together a £4million Town Centre plan but the lottery funding £2m fell through and he lost control (1999) to the Tories.

Only two leaders have contributed anything significant to this Borough in the last 20 years. George did the Globe Centre bringing 100's of jobs to the Borough. Ian Ormerod on a lesser scale sacked the senior management at the Council leading to a mini revival.

Yes Graham and they also scrapped the Works department in 2002 which was a profit making department keeping money within the council and bringing in money from outside contracts, a fact that was never taken into consideration when setting the budget, meaning they had to find around a extra £700,000 just to stand still, plus using rebates that they weren't entitled to, to the tune of £560,000, its hardley any surprise they left a huge budget deficit, which has now been addessed and the council finances are back on track, and back in the black

g jones 27-04-2008 19:44

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 568260)
Yes Graham and they also scrapped the Works department in 2002 which was a profit making department keeping money within the council and bringing in money from outside contracts, a fact that was never taken into consideration when setting the budget, meaning they had to find around a extra £700,000 just to stand still, plus using rebates that they weren't entitled to, to the tune of £560,000, its hardley any surprise they left a huge budget deficit, which has now been addessed and the council finances are back on track, and back in the black

The first bit is somewhat right. Labour scrapped outside contracts. Well Mike Chambers Chief Exec did and I am not sure how much authority he had. At the end of the day it was Labour's fault. Such as the grass cutting contract at the college had come up for renewal and we didn't tender. There is a lot more to this story and I never got the bottom because the people involved have gone.

And guess the rebel at the time was! So we're on the same side and I can count on your support then!

The second bit is rubbish. The accounts according to De Loitte Touche were a mess. Paper profits were being recorded between an antiquated broken down green screen computer system and for the 20 weeks (intermittant) it had been down, an old ledger book. All the payments were historical and not relevant to what was happening as they were internal contracts from the old Tory loony days of CCT (Compulsory Competitive Tendering). £700,000, it might as well have been 700,000 washers, it was paper money, not Tax Payers money.

It still happens now. There is a payment from the Market Hall for Central Services for £175,000 which no-one can work out what it is for. It makes the Market Hall appear to be just keeping it's head above water and why we have higher than necessary rent increases and why byzantine accounts frightened off the private sector.

g jones 27-04-2008 19:49

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 568260)
Yes Graham and they also scrapped the Works department in 2002 which was a profit making department keeping money within the council and bringing in money from outside contracts, a fact that was never taken into consideration when setting the budget, meaning they had to find around a extra £700,000 just to stand still, plus using rebates that they weren't entitled to, to the tune of £560,000, its hardley any surprise they left a huge budget deficit, which has now been addessed and the council finances are back on track, and back in the black

You have had the 1999 figures. If you work out the budgets had we been ratecapped, the Council's budget would now be around £12m approx. It is in fact now £15m because of above inflation increases.

That's a £3m deficit on current spending. I say that as a reminder of the Tory years in Government and the circumstances in which Labour Councillors had to run the Council.

lindsay ormerod 27-04-2008 19:58

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 567772)
Lets take the arndale example: £25,440 for the year.

Retailers, even in Accrington, have had turnover more than £10,000 in a day. Is the rent really that expensive when you look at it like that?


Are you living in dream land?
I have worked in 3 different successful stores in the town and have only taken that kind on money on Christmas Eve !
An average day at Our Price or Music Zone was £1800-£2000.

onlyme 27-04-2008 20:12

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lindsay ormerod (Post 568467)
Are you living in dream land?
I have worked in 3 different successful stores in the town and have only taken that kind on money on Christmas Eve !
An average day at Our Price or Music Zone was £1800-£2000.

Probably means the pound shops ;) lol

derekgas 27-04-2008 20:16

Re: mr britcliffe
 
I have been looking at some properties this week, and in my opinion, the rent on council owned property is far higher than a lot of the private sector, and some of it seems extortionate. My brother worked for a popular sports shop in bury precinct, and according to him, a good saturday (not christmas or anything special) would generate around 7 thousand, but that would only just cover the rent, since that time, out of town outlets have taken thier toll and the shop had to close, if a business cant survive with 7 grand turnover in one day, something is sadly wrong.

garinda 27-04-2008 20:21

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lindsay ormerod (Post 568467)
Are you living in dream land?
I have worked in 3 different successful stores in the town and have only taken that kind on money on Christmas Eve !
An average day at Our Price or Music Zone was £1800-£2000.

There are shops on Oxford Street, the highest turnover per square foot of retail space in the country, that don't do ten grand a day.

The only 'shop' in Accrington that might possibly achieve that figure is the knockin' shop, near to Greg Pope's office.

katex 27-04-2008 20:54

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 568483)
The only 'shop' in Accrington that might possibly achieve that figure is the knockin' shop, near to Greg Pope's office.

:rofl38: 'Many a true word spoken in jest' .. always plenty of repeat customers in this game. Hey, Garinda ... am bored .. perhaps we could go 50/50 .. one in Ossy, one in Clayton. Am I joking ? not quite sure.. :D

andrewb 27-04-2008 20:56

Re: mr britcliffe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lindsay ormerod (Post 568467)
Are you living in dream land?
I have worked in 3 different successful stores in the town and have only taken that kind on money on Christmas Eve !
An average day at Our Price or Music Zone was £1800-£2000.

I didn't claim that they took £10k a day every day, and are both of those shops now closed down?


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:06.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com