Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Crewe and Nantwich (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/crewe-and-nantwich-39435.html)

andrewb 23-05-2008 08:43

Re: Crewe and Nantwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by steeljack (Post 580421)
the BBC site says it a 17% swing , what would that mean nationally in number of seats of a conservative majority at Westminster ?

Sky are reporting if it were to happen at a general it would translate into a 338 Conservative majority:

494 Conservative
101 Labour
25 Lib Dem
+ others

yerself 23-05-2008 08:51

Re: Crewe and Nantwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mancie
not a tory community were if you are rich

You mean like Mr & Mrs Blair and their cronies.

jaysay 23-05-2008 10:27

Re: Crewe and Nantwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yerself (Post 580478)
You mean like Mr & Mrs Blair and their cronies.

Quite right yerself, this shower were elected on a platform of Whiter than White Government, the bigest load of thieving chisellers we've ever seen. Its never been the rich and famous that elected Tory Governmets, I have been a member of the party for 47 years and I was born in a two up two down terraced house to a hard working family.

andrewb 23-05-2008 14:07

Re: Crewe and Nantwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mancie (Post 580428)
Why would that be incorrect?.. for 200 yrs the tories have rejected

Child labour laws
The National health service
The right for women to vote
Invalid income laws
Why ..in over 200yrs have you changed now?

I think what people really care about is what the Conservative party will do for them in 2010, rather than dwelling on the past.

But since it matters deepy to you:
  • Child labour laws, brought in by a Conservative government.
  • The National Health Service, treasured by every Conservative government since Labour established it. Things are no different with Cameron, he is committed to an NHS, wanting to remove the politics from it so it can run better than it is now.
  • Universal sufferage, brought in by a Conservative government.
  • Not sure what invalid income laws mean.

If you're going to attack them, and I suspect you would whatever they proposed, at least get your facts right.

steeljack 23-05-2008 18:40

Re: Crewe and Nantwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 580471)
Sky are reporting if it were to happen at a general it would translate into a 338 Conservative majority:

494 Conservative
101 Labour
25 Lib Dem
+ others

thats a dictatorship , no chance of constructive opposition , majorities like that and common sense goes out of the window

andrewb 24-05-2008 02:00

Re: Crewe and Nantwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by steeljack (Post 580674)
thats a dictatorship , no chance of constructive opposition , majorities like that and common sense goes out of the window

It's not a dictatorship if they're voted in. Anyway that won't happen because by elections always have bigger swings so its not a brilliant measure of what sort of majority they'd have if the people ask them to govern.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:01.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com