Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   13yr old boy falls (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/13yr-old-boy-falls-40651.html)

magpie 28-06-2008 19:55

Re: 13yr old boy falls
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Yolanda25 (Post 598809)
the boy you all talkin about is the son of my friend, yeah u all rite, the same way i feel,that kids shoudnt been on that building on the 1st place, at 13 im sure u know tht it is wrong to go in places like that, but there u go, like someone said earlier, boys will be boys

well maybe she ought to find out where and what her son is up to.....

(ops she does now after the stupid git nearly killed himself)

another idea would be for parents to pay the bill maybe that way it would make them keep a better eye on their off springs......

Neil 28-06-2008 20:33

Re: 13yr old boy falls
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blazey (Post 598762)
I go on many walks in the countryside and often it isn't clear which bits are and aren't the footpath, and if a farmer failed to signpost that I was wandering on to land that contained a risk to me and I got injured I'd be pretty annoyed.


Who is at fault though for not installing the signs, the farmer or whoever says that footpath is a safe public right of way? Also if she did wonder off the public footpath whoose fault is that? I don't think the farmer should have to signpost a path which is not in reality his. If it was his he could close it off when it is not safe to use, he can not close the footpath as it is a public right of way.

If he can not close of the path when it is dangerous to use then he is in effect being denied the use of his own land.

blazey 29-06-2008 22:22

Re: 13yr old boy falls
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 599697)
Who is at fault though for not installing the signs, the farmer or whoever says that footpath is a safe public right of way? Also if she did wonder off the public footpath whoose fault is that? I don't think the farmer should have to signpost a path which is not in reality his. If it was his he could close it off when it is not safe to use, he can not close the footpath as it is a public right of way.

If he can not close of the path when it is dangerous to use then he is in effect being denied the use of his own land.

These are all points that will be raised in court. As I have said time and time again, the law isn't black and white, nor does it provide simple yes and no answers to every problem. If it did we could just use computers to solve the problems.

I haven't studied land law yet, at least not in any depth, so I do not know which result is likely. Will just have to wait and see.

Neil 29-06-2008 22:32

Re: 13yr old boy falls
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blazey (Post 600128)
These are all points that will be raised in court

I was hoping we could have a little debate on the topic. It could have been interesting.

Thats the last time I make a serious post on here :p:D

blazey 30-06-2008 02:15

Re: 13yr old boy falls
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 600133)
I was hoping we could have a little debate on the topic. It could have been interesting.

Thats the last time I make a serious post on here :p:D

I could debate the topic til I'm red in the face but no oubt some smarmy so and so will try and tell me I'm wrong :)

One of the first things we're taught in law school is that there is no such thing as a wrong answer, just a answer that isn't backed up with evidence and sources.

I can give you all the relevant law on this point, but no cases, and no doubt someone would say 'its bad law' when in fact this law isn't bad at all, its just misused.

The law is due to change I believe on trespassing to give rights back to the land owner regarding illegal trespassers, but I'm unsure whether its happened yet because its not something I've been following.

derekgas 30-06-2008 09:35

Re: 13yr old boy falls
 
The law should be 'trespassers may be shot'

blazey 01-07-2008 01:20

Re: 13yr old boy falls
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by derekgas (Post 600218)
The law should be 'trespassers may be shot'

Yes I can see how fair that is to innocent trespassers. And children too who play on land.

Who needs fox hunting when we can shoot children instead?

What a brilliant idea, can't believe I didnt think of it.

panther 01-07-2008 09:29

Re: 13yr old boy falls
 
And ya call me sarcastic:rolleyes:


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com