![]() |
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
Teenage pregnancy rates have soared since sex education became such a big thing, so as far as I'm concerned it has had a detrimental effect on todays society
|
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
Quote:
some women do it to try and trap the men too, 4 or 5 different kids with 4 or 5 different dads, you'd think they'd learn after the first few wouldnt you? |
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
Our science teacher had to teach us about sex in the 2 year of secondary school.
he said "there would be a lot of theory but NO practical work and NO homework".:D |
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
The blame for teenage pregnancies must also lie, in part, with the media and in particular those girlie magazines aimed at teenagers. Don’t forget their parents, grandparents and great grand parents who relaxed their moral values after the last war. Most homes didn’t have man in the house (killed in the war) and poor old mum trying to keep the family solvent just couldn’t cope. With each successive generation those values were eroded away.
However society and the government must also share some of the blame. Latch key kids were left to their own devices as both parents went out to work and they didn’t have the time to educate and control their kids. Both parents went out to work because one wage just wasn’t enough to cater for their needs and wants. Blame the bosses for not paying adequate wages. Commerce must also take some of the blame with their incessant advertising of new this and new that and must have this and must have that. Adverts for make-up, hair care and clothes aimed at women and teenage girls send out the “be sexy, be desirable, be attractive” message. Finally to all those people whingeing about people getting benefits. Would they rather have the child taken away from a single mum and placed in an orphanage? That would cost an awful lot more than a single mum would get on benefits. |
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
Quote:
|
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
Quote:
|
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
A possibly good concept there ruined by the idiocy of the person reporting it. Ridiculous bias and references to completely disproved theories did more damage than good. In reality the vast majority of the population would say that it would not be appropriate for 12-17 year olds to be having children and this would stop that. The only problem I can see would be an increase in STDs as the number of people using other forms of contraceptive would fall due to no fear of pregnancy.
|
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
reason i don't think its a good concept Sam- i have no faith in the testing of these medicines/drugs etc, there aint enough "Long Term research" done into the effects of em, Thalidomide showed that to dire effects.
|
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
Quote:
|
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
Quote:
Again, I wouldn't mind my kids being told about this as long as they went no further, it was age appropriate and not too explicit. |
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
My son started asking questions as a toddler.
I don't believe in lying to children so I did not avoid the subject with lies about storks and gooseberry bushes. I didn't elaborate but answered each question truthfully when asked. As he grew older the questions got more complex, so by the time he was in his early teens he needed no 'sit down chat' to advise him of the 'facts of life'. We had established an ability to discuss the subject without embarrassment, so much so that he related to me the circumstances in which he lost his virginity, and went on to ask about how best to give a woman pleasure. It is never too soon - they will ask when they are ready to know if you show that the question doesn't embarass. |
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
Quote:
You are one cool mum. :D |
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
Is this real!!! not April fools day is it?... sterilise teenage girls..or any aged women ..what planet are we on?..unwanted babies? who are you to say babies are unwanted?... this ain't the 19 century.. Ok if you seem so keen on it lets try it out on your own daughter or grand child.. Nazism.
Mancie give your head a shake and sober up!!! try and read the post before dishing out bad karma. Firstly I know exactly what planet im on unlike yourself. I have seen many cases of unwanted babies through my life and also babies being born into families for the wrong reasons who have either ended up dead ar beaten by thier father. ! Also one sentance if you could be bothered to read explains it all . [COLOR="Red"]Teenage girls, she said, could be steered towards what is described as "long-term contraception".[/COLOR] This is now possible thanks to the development of contraceptive jabs and implants which can last up to five years. Imo If this can be proven to be harmless and not cause lasting harm then it is no different to the contraception we already have. inc the implant which I believe is good for quite some time. How many "unwanted" babies have WE got?..I don't have any unwanted babies.. so if it's you and Cashy then keep it to yourselves Last time I looked this was a public discussion forum:eek: ... where are these what you call "unwanted" babies?..I do have my suspicions they are unwanted by yourself.. for whatever reasons.. but may not be unwanted by the parents. Read above. Now whose being judgemenal |
Re: Why we should sterilise teenage girls ... temporarily at least
Like Lilly says, 5-year olds are only taught Human Anatomy, and the correct words.
My daughter, being a nurse, alway did this with my Grandaughter, and by this age she knew the correct words for all parts of the body, including the genital areas plus sperm/ovaries, etc .. nowt wrong with this. I do think that it is important to move into sex education (from a social point of view as well as biological) from the age of 11, for both female/males as this is when menstruation/puberty can begin, and could be scary if you don't know why this bleeding process, wet dreams are happening to your body. I do agree, however, that it has become more sociably acceptable to have children out of wedlock and part of the problem, but do not agree that any woman has a child just to draw benefits.. that is an unacceptable opinion to me. As to 5-year birth control, bit extreme as may wish to get married and have children in your late teens. Would it be reversible ? Thought that Samf's point re. STD's was solid, however, good contraception has been around for a long time, and still men refuse to wear condoms if they know a gal is on the pill. Difficult to argue in the heat of the moment, so that is where male responsibility comes in. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:42. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com