Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   United states of GB (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/united-states-of-gb-45383.html)

jaysay 06-02-2009 11:31

Re: United states of GB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris (Post 676485)
Ah, but Gord was the first world leader to talk to Obama by phone, taking to opportunity to warn him about the dangers of protectionism. Soon afterwards, Obama introduced his Buy American bill. Funny, that... ;)

Ah but was he talking to Obama or Rory Bremner, Wynonie:rolleyes:

Eric 06-02-2009 16:29

Re: United states of GB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jambutty (Post 676342)
We’ve been the 51st state in all but name since WWII without the benefits.

It is time that we either stood up to the Yanks and told them where to go or became Yanks ourselves.

I like the "tell them where to go option." Canada does it all the time ... Iraq comes quickly to mind ... if Blair had demonstrated the feisty independence of Jean Chretien, that crap in Iraq may not have happened; and if it had anyway, Britain would not have been involved. And with Canada voicing loud opposition to the new American protectionism, it's no surprise that President Obama's first overseas visit will be to Ottawa ... (Ok, maybe it's because Canada is so close;)). However, I do believe that Obama is a very smart man; and he does realize that what the US needs is friends ... not toadies or dependents, but friends. And the nice thing about friends is that you can, on occasion, them they are full of faeces, and still remain friends.:D

Eric 06-02-2009 16:35

Re: United states of GB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris (Post 676485)
Ah, but Gord was the first world leader to talk to Obama by phone, taking to opportunity to warn him about the dangers of protectionism. Soon afterwards, Obama introduced his Buy American bill. Funny, that... ;)

I don't think that it was Obama's intent to have the "Buy American" provisions in his bailout package .... this came from Congress. Obama is smart enough to realize that American protectionism will worsen the recession rather than moderate its effects.

jambutty 09-02-2009 14:17

Re: United states of GB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Royboy39 (Post 676353)
Think about that very carefully Jimbo....The Yanks have pulled us out of the mire more than once.
Without their intervention in WWII we would all be paying homage to a fate worse than the current Labour Government. :eek:

In both world wars, Royboy39, the Yanks were intent on staying neutral and did so until there was direct action against the USA that brought them into both wars on the side of the Allies.

In the First World War it was the sinking of the Lusitania that drew American sympathies to the Allies. Thereafter the sinking of several US cargo vessels by U-Boats dragged the US into the war.

It was a similar story for WWII. Except here it was Pearl Harbour that brought the Yanks into the war. Prior to that even the sinking of American cargo vessels by U-Boats wouldn’t persuade them to join us. But they did sell us on the “Lease Lend Scheme” crappy and obsolete warships and arms for the land forces. The USA made a fortune out of WWII and it took us decades of hard earned taxes to pay it off.

Once Hitler realised the enormity of invading England he abandoned the idea and would have, if asked, allowed us to sue for peace. He even broached the idea through diplomatic channels but Churchill refused.

Hitler didn’t see the UK as a historic enemy of Germany and only attacked these islands because we declared war on Germany. Not the other way round. He only reciprocated. Hitler was more intent on dominating the European continent and putting Russia in its place. Don’t forget that the last successful invasion of these shores was back in 1066 when the Duke of Normandy showed Harold what’s what. Normandy is France and we have a long history of battling the French.

Post WWII it was a generally held view that it was the USSR that was a threat to world peace. But the reality was and still is that it is the USA who is the biggest threat to world peace.

Since Heath this government has been sitting on two fences, the European one and the USA one.

It would be in the people’s best interests to become part of the USA but it is in the politician’s best interests to join with Europe. Guess which way the government will eventually fall?

Royboy39 09-02-2009 14:25

Re: United states of GB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jambutty (Post 677661)
In both world wars, Royboy39, the Yanks were intent on staying neutral and did so until there was direct action against the USA that brought them into both wars on the side of the Allies.

In the First World War it was the sinking of the Lusitania that drew American sympathies to the Allies. Thereafter the sinking of several US cargo vessels by U-Boats dragged the US into the war.

It was a similar story for WWII. Except here it was Pearl Harbour that brought the Yanks into the war. Prior to that even the sinking of American cargo vessels by U-Boats wouldn’t persuade them to join us. But they did sell us on the “Lease Lend Scheme” crappy and obsolete warships and arms for the land forces. The USA made a fortune out of WWII and it took us decades of hard earned taxes to pay it off.

Once Hitler realised the enormity of invading England he abandoned the idea and would have, if asked, allowed us to sue for peace. He even broached the idea through diplomatic channels but Churchill refused.

Post WWII it was a generally held view that it was the USSR that was a threat to world peace. But the reality was and still is that it is the USA who is the biggest threat to world peace.

Since Heath this government has been sitting on two fences, the European one and the USA one.

It would be in the people’s best interests to become part of the USA but it is in the politician’s best interests to join with Europe. Guess which way the government will eventually fall?

Thanks for the history lesson Jim....sure it will be of interest to our younger members.

I don't know which way the Government will go but I'm sure you will tell us?

jambutty 09-02-2009 14:28

Re: United states of GB
 
You won’t need me to tell you. It’ll be on telly once the deal has been done.

cashman 09-02-2009 14:55

Re: United states of GB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jambutty (Post 677661)

It would be in the people’s best interests to become part of the USA but it is in the politician’s best interests to join with Europe. Guess which way the government will eventually fall?

that small paragraph sums up very nicely,exactly what i think.

Taggy 09-02-2009 16:40

Re: United states of GB
 
.....and please could we have a manufacturing industry back too!



Best Regards - Taggy

Benipete 09-02-2009 19:19

Re: United states of GB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taggy (Post 677705)
.....and please could we have a manufacturing industry back too!



Best Regards - Taggy

You can about the same time I get my O.B.E!!:D

cashman 09-02-2009 19:20

Re: United states of GB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Benipete (Post 677779)
You can about the same time I get my O.B.E!!:D

Shhhhhhhhh pete yer on next years honours list n ive been knighted.;)

Benipete 09-02-2009 19:42

Re: United states of GB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 677782)
Shhhhhhhhh pete yer on next years honours list n ive been knighted.;)

At least you got Morrissey to write a song for you.:theband:Swine.

I just got the Monkees.:D:D

flashman 09-02-2009 20:35

Re: United states of GB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 676574)
I like the "tell them where to go option." Canada does it all the time ... Iraq comes quickly to mind ... if Blair had demonstrated the feisty independence of Jean Chretien, that crap in Iraq may not have happened; and if it had anyway, Britain would not have been involved. And with Canada voicing loud opposition to the new American protectionism, it's no surprise that President Obama's first overseas visit will be to Ottawa ... (Ok, maybe it's because Canada is so close;)). However, I do believe that Obama is a very smart man; and he does realize that what the US needs is friends ... not toadies or dependents, but friends. And the nice thing about friends is that you can, on occasion, them they are full of faeces, and still remain friends.:D

It's funny that Canada is often regarded as most like the USA but it seems that the UK has taken over.

Apart from foreign policy it seems that other UK similarities are

- Materialistic lifestyle (especially easy credit)

- Fascination with celebrities (the Royals)

- Image and spin rather than facts and reality

jambutty 09-02-2009 21:07

Re: United states of GB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Benipete (Post 677779)
You can about the same time I get my O.B.E!!:D

Whilst I was serving in the Royal Navy I was awarded the C.D.M.

Mancie 09-02-2009 22:19

Re: United states of GB
 
We seem to be constantly moaning about laws and regulations "imposed" on Britain by the EU from Brussels..but the EU is an elected Parliment.. it's just the same as moaning about the Goverment in London imposing regulations in Accrington.
I'm not standing up for the EU but at least you get a vote on who represents you .. we don't get to vote in USA elections.

cashman 09-02-2009 22:25

Re: United states of GB
 
know what yer saying mancie, but its the vote we didn't get that bugs me.;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:23.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com